Home > Taxes > The Average Percent Of Income Donated To Charity Can Improve

The Average Percent Of Income Donated To Charity Can Improve

Donating money is a very personal decision. There is no right or wrong amount.  Anything more than 0% is good in my eyes. According to several of the largest charitable foundations, the average percentage a person donates of his or her adjusted gross income is 3 to 5%. Studies also discuss how Republicans donate more on an absolute basis, and the poor donate more on a percentage basis as well.

Doing your own taxes helps you think more about such topics as giving. You start wondering whether you’ve given enough or too much. You look for answers to figure out what is the norm and proceed to adjust within the band. Furthermore, you input different charitable scenarios to see how your tax bill changes. It’s all very educational and thought provoking.

DECIDING HOW MUCH TO GIVE

Government Leaders: Vice President Joe Biden donated $4,820 to charity, or 1.44% of his $333,182 salary in 2009. Meanwhile, Obama donated about $329,000 to 40 different charities, or roughly 6% of his $5.5 million 2009 income (largely from books and royalties). Obama also donated $1.4 million of his Nobel Peace Prize proceeds to 10 different charities as a straight pass through. In other words, Obama donated $1.723 million out of a potential $6.9 million in income, or roughly 25%.

Religion: The Bible refers to Jacob promising to give a 10th of what he receives back to God. “And this stone, which I have set for a pillar, shall be God’s house: and of all that thou shalt give me I will surely give the a tenth unto thee.”  Buddhism discusses alms giving to monks and nuns as a way to spiritually connect, show humility, and support the community.

The Super Rich: Warren Buffet pledged 85% of his entire US$45+ billion fortune to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.  His rational is to give it away to people who will live longer than him, and who know how to give better.  In Warren’s case, he is giving away almost his entire net worth, which still leaves billions more to be passed down to others in his immediate circle.

The Poor: Perhaps they don’t pay much in taxes, but the poor do contribute a healthy amount to charity.  The 2000 Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey shows that households with incomes below $20,000 gave 4.6% to charity, higher than any other income group.  Households earning between $50,000 and $100,000 donated 2.5 percent or less.  Only above income levels of $100,000 does the percentage rise again.

THE “STUCK IN THE MIDDLE” PROBLEM

I sincerely wish I was as wealthy as Warren to be able to donate it all away.  Unfortunately, but don’t cry for me, I’m stuck in the middle where I make enough to live a comfortable life, but not enough to not feel the sting of taxes taking away 45% of my highest marginal income.  Hence, until I can join the 45% of Americans who pay no tax, or pay a more reasonable 15-25% of my last marginal income in taxes, I won’t be giving away all my money just yet.

Many people are stuck in the middle like myself.  We are climbing the marginal income tax curve, feeling good about our progress, but also feeling bad that the harder we work, the more we pay to the point where we think about not working so hard any more.  The chart below shows the slight dip in percentage of giving when one hits the $75,000 to $100,000 income level.  We have bills to pay, mouths to feed, debt to repay, roofs to repair, and retirements to save for.  It’s very hard to give a lot under the circumstances.

THE GIVE NOTHING IDEOLOGY

One of the most interesting viewpoints I’ve read is how none of us should donate any money to charity.  The premise being that since we are moving progressively towards Socialism in America, with our income redistribution through a progressive tax system, the omnipotent government is responsible for supporting charitable organizations and eradicating poverty.  The more I think about this viewpoint, the more I think it makes some sense given America has embraced big government to solve our problems (social security, health care, generous unemployment benefits, and so forth).

If you go visit Singapore, for example, you won’t see poverty on the streets.  That’s because their benign dictator system has ensured that all people live a reasonably comfortable life with government housing projects, central provident fund (social security), solid infrastructure, and flat tax system.  The government is doing its job in ensuring that everyone has at least a certain standard of living.

If we are relying on the government to fix our problems, we should also lean on the government to eradicate poverty.

A SIMPLE SOLUTION OF REDISTRIBUTION OF REDISTRIBUTED WEALTH

Those who pay lower taxes or no taxes at all are suggested to donate more to charitable causes since they are being subsidized by the few who donate the most to charity and pay the most in taxes to keep America running.  The average effective tax rate is 20% for all Americans and 26% for the top quintile of earners ($248,400).  Perhaps a simple donation formula for everyone is: 20% (Avg. effective tax rate) – An Individual’s Effective Tax Rate = How Much To Donate.  Of course, if your existing effective tax rate is already higher than 20%, you should feel good that the government is utilizing your income for the greater good…….. but let’s just use one example where this is not the case.

With some 131,000 homeless veterans in America, our government isn’t doing a great job honoring our people who allow us to be free.  It makes me mad.  But, I strongly believe that the 40%+ of Americans who pay no Federal income taxes are good people who are willing to redistribute their wealth as well.  Let’s call it a redistribution of redistributed wealth so the most needy benefits!

Readers, What percentage of your gross income do you donate to charity?  Do you have a specific role model or group you follow in terms of how much to give?  Do you think my formula for giving makes sense?  How do you balance giving money with building a retirement fund and paying off debt?

What percentage level of giving do you think starts getting fishy by the IRS?

Regards,

Sam

If you enjoyed this article, please sign up for my RSS Feed or E-mail Feed to keep in touch.

 

Categories: Taxes Tags:
  1. March 29th, 2011 at 00:32 | #1

    “Anything more than 0% is good in my eyes.”

    Same.

    I dunno, it depends on the month. Maybe 3-5% of net?

    [Reply]

  2. March 29th, 2011 at 01:07 | #2

    I think as you get richer and older you can up the income you give to charity. Some people start off by giving 10% and living off and investing the rest and when they get older they donate 90% and live off the other 10%. It’s not common, but it’s a nice model.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    As the chart above indicates.. not necessarily as you get richer b/c of the tax burden one experiences. Giving dipped when you reached $75,000-$100,000. I truly wonder what happens at $200,000+ and so, the target level where the US gov’t wants to really put on the tax screws.

    [Reply]

    Sunil from The Extra Money Blog Reply:

    Great point Max and I agree. The stats may show otherwise, but as Sam mentioned we don’t know what happens post 200k. Aside from the financial mechanics, there is a huge psychological component that goes into giving more as you make more. I can tell you that is true from my own personal experiences

    [Reply]

  3. March 29th, 2011 at 04:12 | #3

    I don’t have a set percentage, nor have I kept track – but if the cause hits home, I donate.

    [Reply]

    Paula @ AffordAnything.org Reply:

    Me too! I donate when I’m moved to do so, when emotion grips me. Perhaps I see a sad documentary, or watch a disabled person on the street, and I feel an urge to DO something.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    If you do your own taxes, you’ll be interested to find what percentage of gross or AGI you’ve given. It opens your eyes, and makes you want to learn and read about articles like this one to see if you are in the ball bark!

    [Reply]

  4. March 29th, 2011 at 04:28 | #4

    We tend to give in spurts, like annually at an event we attend for American Cancer Society, or when we’re moved by a documentary or something. Not the most methodical or steady giving, but better than nothing.

    The higher Republican giving can be attributed to higher religious component. I don’t know that it’s a party methodology so much as you have more hard-core religious in the right than the left. Churches are huge charity organizations.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    You’re right about the religious component. That’s what a lot of the studies seem to show. But, if you look at the presidents giving past records, it sure seems like Democrats give way less.

    [Reply]

  5. March 29th, 2011 at 05:19 | #5

    I want to donate about 5% of my pretax income, but if I did that every year, I’d never get to itemize my deductions. So I donate 0% in one year, and then 10% the next. I’m in one of the 10% years, so my budget is strained, but I know I’ll save a little on taxes when I do them for 2011.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I see.. b/c 5% doesn’t meet the threshold to allow you to itemize? It’s good you’re cognizant of that level in the first place b/c I don’t think I was then.

    [Reply]

  6. March 29th, 2011 at 05:23 | #6

    We give about 10% of gross to charities/ and our church (total). I figured if I can learn to live on less when I’m making less, it might be easier to give when I make more in the future

    [Reply]

  7. March 29th, 2011 at 07:15 | #7

    We give about 5 to 7%. I hope to increase that amount as our income increases.

    [Reply]

  8. March 29th, 2011 at 10:46 | #8

    Hey!
    I am a cheerful giver, especially when it about giving in church.

    [Reply]

  9. March 29th, 2011 at 10:48 | #9

    Great Read. My family donates 3% of our income our children’s school.

    [Reply]

  10. March 29th, 2011 at 14:26 | #10

    I don’t have any set % and don’t give on a continuous basis (although I’m only about 8 months into my career). I generally give for random things throughout the year when I or others are fundraising. Eventually I’d like to give more, but right now I’m just not at that point in my life/finances. I realize that people who make less than I do probably donate more, but that’s just the way it’s going to be for now until I achiever some of my other goals.

    [Reply]

  11. March 29th, 2011 at 15:19 | #11

    If your not going to donate your money you better donate your time or your blood!

    [Reply]

  12. Charlie
    March 29th, 2011 at 18:42 | #12

    I’d say my donations range between 8-12% (if I include non-cash donations to Goodwill/Salvation Army). My totals vary depending on how my income is doing for the year and what kind of events are going on. If I had double my current income I’d definitely donate more. There are so many great organizations out there that I’ve always wanted to support but didn’t have the means to. I think that’s great Warren is donating such a high percentage of his wealth too.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    The non-cash donations is an important part that I wonder whether many of these studies consider. One person’s clutter is another person’s treasure!

    [Reply]

  13. March 29th, 2011 at 20:16 | #13

    Sam, I donate 10% to charity, and have done so since I was a young boy. Nowadays, it isn’t easy sometimes. I feel your pain in the sense of being stuck in the middle. I make enough money to live comfortably, so long as I am a careful spender, contribute to retirement, and keep my family taken care of.

    Wouldn’t it be great to be in Mr. Buffet’s position? Even so, any giving is better than nothing, and it’s certainly helped me become a better person, giving away of my earnings to a good cause.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    10% is pretty good and sounds like you’ve got everything balanced! Good one.

    [Reply]

  14. March 29th, 2011 at 20:28 | #14

    My parents donated almost 20 percent of their net worth when they retired. Because they wanted control over how the money was spent, they formed a foundation, invested the money in dividend-yielding ETFs, and each year, they keep the principal amount intact and use the dividend payouts to pay boarding school tuition for orphaned children in a developing country.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    That’s pretty good of them! Are your parents in a pretty high bracket/group for wealth?

    [Reply]

    Paula @ AffordAnything.org Reply:

    Nope; if they had to rely solely on their retirement savings, they’d be in trouble. They have only a few hundred thousand saved for retirement (they’re 70) and they live in a townhouse. Fortunately, they’re also from a generation that receives a nice pension from their employer. Their pension is $60,000 a year, which they live on … meaning they don’t really need to touch their retirement savings unless there’s an unexpected financial emergency.

    Part of the benefit of supporting kids in developing nations is that the U.S. dollar stretches a lot further there; one year of boarding school tuition in Kathmandu is $1,200. (We negotiated the rate down from its sticker price by a couple hundred). Currently we sponsor 3 children.

    [Reply]

  15. Mike Hunt
    March 29th, 2011 at 21:02 | #15

    8% of gross income cash donation to various charities in 2010, I think anything over 15% will be looking fishy to the IRS.

    Maybe it depends how easy it is to check out and then try and collect more taxes…

    -Mike

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    15% seems like a pretty low threshold. I think there is a rule that says you can’t give more than 50% legally.

    I would think anything over 25% would start being suspect.

    [Reply]

    Mike Hunt Reply:

    This article seems to think than anything more than 3% could be suspect as that is what the average person gives. Seems a bit low to me:

    http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2011/03/28/getting-the-most-from-your-charitable-deductions/

    The part about 3% is towards the end of the article.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Seems consistent with the findings in my chart above of 3.1%. That’s the thing though, GRS is targeted towards the middle to lower income reader given JD’s background. It would be interesting to see the giving figures in the $200,000, $500,000 and $1million+ ranges.

    I wonder if JD’s readers knows he makes a lot of money now?

  16. Justin
    March 30th, 2011 at 04:10 | #16

    Powerful article. Its percentage of people who donate with less than $20,000 in income amazes me. I donate monthly, but always feel I could do much much more.

    [Reply]

  17. March 30th, 2011 at 06:37 | #17

    Currently we are more adhoc donators. We do multiple one time donations throughout the year. One of our goals though is to get us more set up on monthly donation programs. We just need to pick the charities we believe in.

    [Reply]

  18. March 30th, 2011 at 11:49 | #18

    Call me a prude, but I’m not much for donating. I donate irregularly, often spontaneously, and I’ve donated only to organizations that I know a lot about, or ones that I think actually do good work with the money they bring in.

    One of my favorite charities, by far, is http://www.heifer.org/# Heifer International. They’ve got an approach that I wish other charities would follow in giving things to people that keep giving. You can, for a very low donation, provide people in impoverished countries not with food, but with animals that produce food.

    For $500, you can donate a milk cow to a family. The site says, “A good dairy cow can produce four gallons of milk a day – enough for a family to drink and share with neighbors. Milk protein transforms sick, malnourished children into healthy boys and girls. The sale of surplus milk earns money for school fees, medicine, clothing and home improvements.”

    I like Buffett’s approach in paying it forward once you’ve accumulated all that you could. Sure, he could have donated a billion 30 years ago, but I guarantee his portfolio did better than any charity organization on the planet.

    That said, eventually I want to be able to donate in larger sums, but I’ll definitely be paying myself first until then. As for now, spontaneous and small donations still work their way in.

    [Reply]

  19. Norman
    March 30th, 2011 at 13:25 | #19

    Why would anyone compare the percentage they are giving to charity with what anyone else is giving? Because they care too much what other people think and aren’t giving for the right reasons. Also, I do not think giving tithe to a church should be considered giving to a “charity” and should not be deductible for tax purposes. For the most part the money stays with the church to build new buildings, pay for the best preachers and song artists, etc, etc, etc. Yes, some churches reach out to the poor but it is a very small percentage of what they take in. Oh, by the way, when the non-working rich pay the same percentage tax on their dividend income that I pay on my wages, we can talk about income redistribution.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Because everything is relative and people are curious.

    [Reply]

  20. March 30th, 2011 at 19:41 | #20

    I think in order to make it a complete comparison we should try to factor in the time and expertise some people donate to charity as well. As a student I know I donated hundreds of hours to charities. I may not have a lot of extra money (although I had very little income, so as a percentage, I might have been on the low end of your average) but the time I donated would have definitely been worth a lot more than most people give. If someone donates their unique skills as a professional or tradesman, this is obviously even more valuable.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Time definitely is valuable, no doubt about it. In fact, often I argue that time spent is more valuable than money spent b/c it helps put perspective in each of us.

    [Reply]

    My University Money Reply:

    Good point Sam!

    [Reply]

  21. March 31st, 2011 at 10:31 | #21

    Are you suggesting the stingiest group of givers are rich Democrats, ha ha!

    Seriously though I am not surprised by the poor people giving the most %, many poor people are more likely to have been in a position to know someone who needs or have needed charity so it;s more known how helpful it is.

    I guess the democrat ideology is that no one would need charity if the gov could provide for everyone whereas Repubs believe that giving should be done out of choice so. I can see good and bad to both sides.

    I don’t have a % that I give, just give what I can, when I can. It’s likely when the debt is zapped that I will get my contributions up higher again.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Ha! Not suggesting anything at all mate. I was curious to know, so after some research, this is what I found.

    I guess the Democrats vs. Republicans giving debate is a whole other topic! A lot of it is tied to religious reasons.

    [Reply]

  22. April 1st, 2011 at 06:03 | #22

    From the very first job I had out of college, I have set aside 10% of all base / bonus to charity. That has increased through the years as I have made more money. I still give a fixed percentage today, though I do not track it. In addition, there are several instances of one offs, i.e. Katrina, Japan, etc.

    [Reply]

  23. April 2nd, 2011 at 15:57 | #23

    I didn’t used to give much at all and felt like I couldn’t afford it. Once I started planning where every dollar went, suddenly I could give regularly.

    My percentage is 3% now, but will increase next year when the last non-mortgage debt is paid.

    [Reply]

  24. April 3rd, 2011 at 07:17 | #24

    @Tim @ Faith and Finance

    @Sunil from The Extra Money Blog

    @Kay Lynn @ Bucksome Boomer

    @eemusings

    @JT McGee

    @Melissa

    @harvestwages

    @Kevin Yu

    @Miss T @ Prairie Eco-Thrifter

    Hey guys, thanks for your feedback. Sounds like everybody is in the 1%-10% range. With some giving more if including non-cash donations. My range is about 2%-3.5%.

    [Reply]

  25. July 19th, 2011 at 06:35 | #25

    I start out with 10% of my net income but I also give 10% of anything that comes back from taxes. In addition, I volunteer my time to charitable organizations because often that is more beneficial for them than the cash it would require to hire someone to do the job.

    [Reply]

  1. April 2nd, 2011 at 07:24 | #1

PRIVACY: We will never disclose or sell your e-mail address or any of your data from this site. We do highly welcome posts and community interaction, and registering is simply part of the posting system.

DISCLAIMER: Financial Samurai exists to thought provoke and learn from the community. Your decisions are yours alone and we are in no way responsible for your actions. Stay on the righteous path and think long and hard before making any financial transaction!

Keigu,

Financial Samurai