Home > Career & Employment, Most Popular > Who Are The Top 1% Income Earners?

Who Are The Top 1% Income Earners?

Triangle Showing Top EarnersIt’s trendy to rage against the top 1% nowadays. We’ve discussed how the world will go through further employment pain thanks to the decline in the stock markets, EuroZone debt crisis, US state-level budget problems, and political impotence. Things are not pretty to say the least.

From my rental property article, you discover that the top 1% are a couple who met in law school at 25 and are now 28 year old 2nd year associates making $380,000 combined. The top 1% is also the 28 year old Google software engineer from Caltech who brings in $450,000 a year and has $400,000 in savings. The top 1% is the 35 year old cardiologist who is finally making over $300,000 a year after 11 years of post high school education and 3 years of residency work at $60,000 a year. By the time he’s 45, he will probably make over $1 million dollars.

Where else can we find the top 1%? Oh yeah, MBA grads who join Wall Street firms such as JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs at the standard $150,000 base salary and $30,000 sign-on bonus at age 29-30.  But, you knew this already since that’s who so many people are demonstrating against. If they can last through the treacherous ups and downs of the markets, the multiple rounds of layoffs every year, the intense pressure of 60-80 hour work weeks, not to mention all the internal political landmines, they too will make over $380,000 a year by the time they are 35 year old second year Vice Presidents.

THE TOP 1%: COME OUT, COME OUT, WHEREVER YOU ARE

Public Schools: Public colleges regularly pay their employees hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. The best paid University of California employee is Jeff Tedford, with a salary of $3 million a year coaching football. Not bad for a job many would say they’d love to do for much less.  Practically every single Top 25 head coach in football and basketball makes multiple-six figures. The UC’s last President earned $900,000 and UCSF’s Chancellor, Susan Desmond-Hellman made $450,000.

Politicians: In September 1999, President Clinton signed legislation that increased the presidential salary to $400,000, effective January 2001. This presidential pay raise was the first since 1969, when the president’s salary was raised from $100,000 to $200,000. Adjusted for inflation, $200,000 in 1969 would be worth $930,232 today. On top of the salary and expense accounts, both the U.S. president and vice president are given free housing with plenty of amenities. The White House has 132 rooms, 32 bathrooms, a movie theater, bowling alley, billiards room, tennis court, jogging track and putting greens.  Pretty good perks!

Online Infopreneurs: Bloggers making over $380,000 a year are a dime a dozen. Here are some that make the list: Heather Armstrong (Dooce), Darren Rowe (Pro Blogger), Michael Arrington (Tech Crunch), Pete Cashmore (Mashable), John Chow (John Chow), J. Shoemoney (Shoemoney), Perez Hilton (Perez Hilton), Ben Huh (Cheezeburger Network), Peter Rojas (Gizmodo), Leo Babauta (Zen Habits), and many top personal finance bloggers. There are hundreds more that we’ve never heard of.

TV Journalism: Anchorwomen and men make well over $380,000 at all the major stations in all the major cities. Katie Couric sealed an eye-popping $75 million, 5 year contract for CBS.  Political comedian, Jon Stewart from the Daily Show makes around $15 million a year and has a net worth north of US$50 million. Jon makes his money making fun of politicians and rich people. Documentary-maker, Michael Moore, has made millions from railing against the car, food, and finance industries. Oprah is the queen of them all with mega-billions.

Executives: We then come to all the CEOs of the Fortune 500 companies who on average make a somewhat outrageous $10 million a year. If you include the CFOs, COOs, and all other C-level execs, we’re talking about thousands who make in the multi-millions. These aren’t the top 1%. These are the top 0.1%!  Many Directors and VP of Fortune 500 companies all make well over $380,000. You don’t have to be a C-level executive to get there.

Internet Start-Ups: And then there are the founders of all the great internet/tech companies you see today: Apple, Zynga, Twitter, Google, Youtube, eBay and so forth. They are the creators of the tools you use everyday to communicate and entertain yourself with. There are thousands more you’ve never heard of, who get acquired by the gorillas and make millions too.

Professional Sports: Every starting NFL player makes well over $380,000.  So do all the members of every NBA team and European soccer league. Men and women who hit fuzzy green balls and whack dimply white balls earn over $380,000.  It’s hard for a Nascar and Indy driver not to make over $380,000. Finally, baseball players have incredible multi-year guaranteed contracts that make all other sports envious! They are in the top 1%.

Entertainment Media: When you come home from a long days work and switch on the tube, the stars of your favorite TV sitcoms are well into the top 1%. When you take your significant other to the movies on a Saturday night to watch the highly anticipated Big Momma’s House III, the actors are all in the top 1%. They entertain you and make you laugh, and you go out and support them as a result.

THE TOP 1% ARE EVERYWHERE

The top 1% of income earners are everywhere. They walk among us peacefully, and often times invisible to you and me.  Why are we trying to hunt them down? They have worked hard to get to where they are and many of them employ thousands of the rest of us 99%. Many of them entertain us with their movies, or their witty morning banter.  Some of us even fix our broken bones.  Even more donate a significant amount to charity. Shouldn’t we say “thank you” to the top 1% instead of eviscerating them?

Do you want to be in the top 1%? It will take a lot of hard work and creativity that’s for sure.  The top 1% are no different from you and me. The top 1% is that kid raising her hand in the front of the class and the scrawny 8th grader who plays JV baseball, but never varsity. The top 1% join you in causes and vote along side of you.  The top 1% still have to wait in line at the security check-in and sit in middle seats. The top 1% die from cancer and eat more than they should.  The top 1% have loved ones.

Some may have caught a lucky break, while others just inherited it all. Those who didn’t earn their way to the top 1% are a minority. We can’t all get to the top 1%, but we can all certainly try.

Recommendations To Increase Your Wealth

1) Manage Your Finances In One Place: The best way to increase your wealth is to get a handle on your finances by signing up with Personal Capital. They are a free online platform which aggregates all your financial accounts in one place so you can see where you can optimize. Before Personal Capital, I had to log into eight different systems to track 28 different accounts (brokerage, multiple banks, 401K, etc) to track my finances. Now, I can just log into Personal Capital to see how my stock accounts are doing, how my net worth is progressing, and where my spending is going. The best feature is the 401K Fee Analyzer which has saved me over $1,000 in annual portfolio fees I had no idea I was paying! There is no better tool online that has helped me reach early retirement. It only takes a minute to sign up.

2) Refinance Your Mortgage: If you are a homeowner and you have not refinanced in the past year, I strongly suggest you check online to see what the latest rates are. There is seriously some serious mortgage interest savings to be had! I always check with Quicken Loans because they are fast, quick, and provide a no obligation real quote based on the input you provide. I recently refinanced to a 5/1 ARM for 2.625% in the Summer of 2012 after just refinancing in the fall of 2011 for 3.125% from 3.625%! I am now saving $4,000 a year in mortgage interest!

3) Check Your Credit Score: Everybody needs to check their credit score once every six months given the risk of identity theft and the fact that 30% of credit scores have errors. For over a year, I thought I had a 790ish credit score and was fine, until my mortgage refinance bank on day 80 of my refinance told me they could not go through due to a $8 late payment by my tenants from two years ago! My credit score was hit by 110 points to 680 and I could not get the lowest rate! I had to spend an extra 10 days fixing my score by contacting the utility company to write a “Clear Credit Letter” to get the bank to follow through. Check your TransUnion credit score for free at GoFreeCredit.com and protect yourself.

Best,

Sam

Categories: Career & Employment, Most Popular Tags:
  1. October 12th, 2011 at 03:23 | #1

    Put me in the camp that’s trying to become a 1 percenter.

    What I don’t understand is why it even matters how much money someone else has if my needs are taken care of. If you’re in the top 1% of income earners, then it’s likely a result of others voting, with their wallets, that you’re deserving of such compensation. Although it’s not a perfect measure, your income is a reflection of your value in the marketplace. Wanna make more money? Start with being more useful to others?

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    More useful to others, instead of depending on others. That sounds like a good idea!

    Good luck in your journey to top 1%!

    [Reply]

    soo Reply:

    so what if your needs are not taken care of? Say, for instance, that you can’t find a job and have hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loan debt to pay off soon?

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    You pay off your loans and honor the contract.

    [Reply]

    Kelt Reply:

    Samurai, how would you suggest paying off your loans when you don’t have a source of income?

    Also, a $50,000 loan at 4% is about $500/m for 10 years. Which leaves you paying about $61,000. That’s a steep price for 10 years, considering that only the top 1% make $360,000/year. And then consider student loans for $100,000, which would end up costing $120,000 (over $1000/m).

    I’ve read some of your articles, and it’s quite obvious you’re not hurting for money or maybe you just live in a facade of wealth. I do like reading your stats though; you could list where you get your information from though.

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Can mom and dad float you for a while as you find something? There are tons of jobs out there, albeit minimum wages jobs ready to hire. job openings in the US are at a 3 year high.

    You can also call the lending institution and ask what specific programs they have to help ease payments. Could be an extension of the pay back period, for example.

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I’m not sure I follow you. Why would you have $50,000 in loans you can’t pay off? Why are you asking me when you’re the one who signed the papers to take out the loan? Are you not willing to work to pay it off?

    bbyfce1218 Reply:

    I don’t get it. My hubby and I had TWO undergrad student loans when we got married, and then took on a THIRD loan for him to get his MBA. At the time the interest rate was 7% on those loans and we had over $85K among the three loans. We managed to pay the loans, buy a car, buy a house, have two kids (AND feed and clothe them). HOW? We worked 50-60 hour weeks for a while, budgeted our money, clipped coupons, bought only WHAT WE NEEDED, and did a lot of “do-it-yourself” projects in the house rather than hire someone. All this whining about the cost of loans that YOU signed papers to acquire, is getting a bit old and tiresome. If it were a mortgage and you didn’t pay you’d be in foreclosure, but I bet you’d work had NOT to lose your house, even if it meant a minimum wage job, and some negotiation with your lender to ease things a bit.

    Ride AAPL to the 1% Reply:

    You go back to college and get a degree in a desired field…

    [Reply]

    soo Reply:

    Oh yes. Answer debt with more debt. The American way!

    Josh 25% Reply:

    There is always a price to pay. Supply and demand, if you don’t have a job it means you aren’t needed. Your options are to wait around and hope eventually you are needed or make yourself needed. You know who doesn’t have a hard time finding a job? The 35 year old cardiologist, thats who. He has more debt in student loans than most people will make in a lifetime, but he will be able to pay it off and live well because he has a job in a desired field.

    pcd Reply:

    You are dead on Ride AAPL.

    I’m sorry you can’t find a job after spending 4 years drinking beer and reading classics or studying art history (all of which are truly lovely pursuits, but don’t necessarily make you competitive against an engineer, doctor etc. in the job market. Do you see anyone in China majoring in these kinds of fields?) You choose your major and now feel entitled to earn a “college degree appropriate” income.

    And there are always jobs out there. Go work at McDonalds if you need to and honor your loans. Stop asking for handouts. I’m sorry you feel you are above Mcdonalds – but the economy is speaking and you are not adding enough value to get a higher paying job. If you don’t like the reality then go back to school and get some hard skills.

    Cheryl Reply:

    Where did you borrow from? The government only allows a student a certain amount per year, so that they don’t end up owing more than $50k after four years… less if you’re a dependent of your parents.

    [Reply]

    Weaver Reply:

    Cheryl,
    Perhaps the individual who commented above has graduate student loans as well.

    top 5% Reply:

    the problem is not just the top 1% and the 99%. the problem is whether everyone has an equal start in the right family with the right mentality toward life. every government should put major efforts in educating families and parents, not in the militaries (the major spending in our country). not everything we like is good thing. we over pay those athlets and movie stars. we isolate those unfortunate to certain neighborhood where the schools are bad and they ended up dropping out of schools and some become gangsters and drug dealers. all we do is to creat gated communities with security protection. this will never work long term. it is time to have true intelligent people to run for the government, not those self serving politicians we see on TV everyday. all they talked about are things coming from a primitive mind.

    [Reply]

  2. October 12th, 2011 at 05:45 | #2

    Other people’s tax rates are to blame for my personal balance sheet.

    [Reply]

    My University Money Reply:

    *Like

    [Reply]

  3. Sid
    October 12th, 2011 at 05:48 | #3

    By definition, the top 1% are everywhere. If you take a group of 100, there will be, on average, exactly 1 who is in the 1%. Here is the problem…the 1% are NOT everywhere. They hunt in packs. One place they enjoy gathering is the halls of power such as Congress where they gain access by virtue of being in the 1% and then put laws into effect to help their kindred.

    At the core of the problem is this, as I stated above…the top 1% should by definition be everywhere. They are not. They have created a new gilded age that I suspect will go the way of the first.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I agree with your thesis. So why aren’t people protesting against the government then? Where’s the “Occupy Congress” movement? Or has it begun?

    [Reply]

    Mountn_Man Reply:

    “Where’s the “Occupy Congress” movement? Or has it begun?”

    Yeah, its called the Tea Party, and it started about 2 years ago, and had a big impact on the last election.

    [Reply]

    Tawster Reply:

    They _are_ everywhere. They are mainly small business owners. Like your favorite dentist, auto-parts store owner, my favorite independent bookstore owner, a local successful italian restaurant owner, construction company owners, some electricians, plumbers, realtors, etc. etc. But some are employees, like top caliber engineers, architects, accountants, C-level folks at businesses of all sizes, loads of sales people and marketers.

    Those are the vast majority of the 1%. They work hard and employ or enable a lot of people.

    [Reply]

    Naomi Reply:

    Exactly! If you live in California you don’t have to look far. It’s expensive to live here. I am in the top 1%, I’m a doctor who works hard (over 80 hours a week) My student loans are etrousous. I save 100s of lives a year and work very hard for every dollar I earn. Yet the guy who sits on the couch, playing the victim wondering why a $300k a year hasn’t fallen in his lap when he has done nothing to earn it, feels I need to pay his share because he’s been too lazy to try to change his life. I wasn’t born with a silver spoon and earned every dollar I have ever made. I worked at McDonalds when I was 16 and it sucked but, rather than deciding this was what I was going to do for the rest of my life, I decided I needed to make life changes which include not going to the movies, out to dinner, etc. to pay for school. This is a very lazy country in my opinion.

    [Reply]

    top 5% Reply:

    the education should never be such expensive in the first place. in some european countries, the education is free all the way to college and the students even get paid to go to schools. such high cost to get through medical schools certainly shy away many talented young people who may become excellent doctors. our country spends too much money on too many useless things, like invading and messing up other countries who are harmless. the most important things in life are 1. health, 2, education, 3, social harmony. all money should be spent on these things, all the rest are less or non important.

    WLynn Reply:

    “Exactly! If you live in California you don’t have to look far. It’s expensive to live here. I am in the top 1%, I’m a doctor who works hard (over 80 hours a week) My student loans are etrousous.”

    and yet you can’t spell.

    Cheryl Reply:

    You’re correct. The uber rich are politicians, sports figures, musicians, actors, and oh yea, some business people who used their genius and took huge risks. They pay plenty… far, far more than their “fair share” of taxes, while half pay absolutely zero, while demanding that the rich pay even more. Time to cut the cord. Let the Bush tax cuts for ALL expire, and set a minimum tax on every single earner out there so that they actually CARE where Congress is blowing the money and insist on accountability. If Europe can tax everyone, so can we. And don’t start on the other taxes everyone pays. I don’t care. That is for their own benefit… not the annual spending of over $3 trillion.

    [Reply]

    Dandy Reply:

    Hey Top 5%, get a grip. If you want lots of money then you actually have to work for it. You spend a lot of time complaining about the system here. If it’s that awful for you why don’t you move to Europe where it is apparently uber awesome dude. Or you can help out the social harmony here by pulling your weight.

    +100 to Naomi

  4. October 12th, 2011 at 06:07 | #4

    Would like to see all those protestors rail against Steve Jobs and give up their iPods and iPhones.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Jobs is a god. Ain’t gonna happen! His $6 billion net worth transcends it all.

    [Reply]

    Prins Reply:

    Steve Jobs had a salary of $1. His wealth was created by his ideas. Quite different from a CEO of a health insurance company who takes home 30 MM while raising the premiums yet again with 9%. If you do not create, but are just a hired hand to tend the store, 1 million should be more than enough, if the store is really big maybe 2.

    [Reply]

    Tawster Reply:

    His paycheck said $1. He got gobs and gobs of stock…. which is also part of his compensation. So, no, he was never paid merely $1.

    Someone making $30M is represented as part of the 1% just like that person represents the top 25%. I.e., they are really in the .1% or some such. So… focus on the top .1% if you will, not the top 1%. The author of this article mentions this issue with the protest. And I concur. So far… the protests are protesting mostly small business owners and talented wage earners. I.e., they are tossing the ball down the lane and it is jumping over and hitting the wrong pins. Hence… most educated people are not supportive of the primary statement of the OWS folks.

    top 5% Reply:

    not everyone is born a steve job’s brain. but that does not mean others contribute less than job, only in different ways. recently i moved to a different town, the movers used their blood and sweat to carefully move every house item to my new home. i appreciated very much of their hard work, not any less than job’s iphone. in fact i dont have a iphone, far too expensive than it is worth. the movers will never earn that kind of money job can. but their contribution is nothing less. in fact, it is said that job used cheap labors in China to assemble iphone (cost $8 and sell to us $700). job should taxed to his bone.

  5. October 12th, 2011 at 07:20 | #5

    I too am trying to hit that 1% category myself. Like Shawanda said though so wisely, it really doesn’t matter how much money you have as long as you are looked after and happy. Really, very few things that cost a ton of money can actually make us happy. It is the other components of our life that really matter.

    [Reply]

  6. Untemplater
    October 12th, 2011 at 08:23 | #6

    I’m not a 1% income earner but I’m not complaining. I’m actually very content and if I make more great, if not no problem because I have savings to help me through the tough times. I applaud the folks in the 1% and hope they continue to succeed. They do create a multitude of jobs and help keep our country moving forward. I think the more important issues are lowering the cost of a good education, healthcare reform, and a flat tax would be nice too!

    [Reply]

  7. October 12th, 2011 at 08:44 | #7

    I’m not a 1% earner, but I’m doing just fine. If I make more than I do now, i’d never complain (of course) but I’d probably start a business with it so I can be in the top 1%.
    I dont like th 99% protesters because I don think “soak the rich” is a good tax policy.
    I completely agree with shawanda – if you’ve got what you need, you can be happy on any income.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Starting a business is great. It’s just a scary lot of work that if people knew, they’d probably never start IMO!

    [Reply]

  8. October 12th, 2011 at 10:41 | #8

    Why are they hunting just the 1%ers? Why not the 5%ers? Aren’t they doing better than 95%? Why limit it.

    I am not in the 1% but strive to be one day…PROUDLY

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Stand proud E-dog! That would be cool if the bottom 50% rioted against the top 50% (all who make above 33k)!

    [Reply]

    Penny Reply:

    How on earth would that be cool?

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    It would be an all out Royal Rumble and a more even fight! You wouldn’t get excited?

    Cheryl Reply:

    Protest the 47% who pay nothing and whine that others aren’t paying their “fair share.”

    [Reply]

  9. October 12th, 2011 at 11:38 | #9

    Hunting for the 1% sounds better than hunting for the .1%. Anyway, I think they can afford to pay a little more tax, why not?
    If I ever make it to the 1%, I wouldn’t mind paying a bit more. Well, ask me again when I’m there. :)

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    K. Let me know when you are there and I’ll ask you how it feels after you look at the 6 figure tax bill and still shitty government :)

    [Reply]

    Patrick Reply:

    Awesome reply Sam!

    If you are a legal citizen then you don’t need to protest and complain on
    internet forums, you get the chance to voice your opinion every other November in
    the election of local, state and federal politicians. If you don’t vote, then you have
    no excuse or grounds to stand on.

    [Reply]

    liam Reply:

    exept for the fact that every singe federal politition is a multimillionar fear monger.

    Cheryl Reply:

    As long as half of the population doesn’t have to pay any federal income tax, you are not going to change their voting pattern. It’s only going to get more cumbersome on the half that do pay taxes, particularly those who have no where to hide their income, and loopholes.

    Everyday Tips Reply:

    Sam, that literally made me laugh out loud.

    Once in the top one percent, you can effective drop down to the top 25 percent in terms of real money once you are forced to give all your cash away.

    I prefer to donate my money to worthwhile organizations instead of agencies that will squander my money. Nobody says that the top 1 percent does not give away money. Maybe they just want the money to go to a worthwhile cause?

    What about those in the top 50 percent that don’t pay taxes period. Should’t they want to give money to the government too??

    [Reply]

    Ride AAPL to the 1% Reply:

    I made the top 1% last year. From making $800 a month and keeping almost all of it as a private in the Army, to currently giving up almost all of my income I have mixed feelings. If I paid any company $130,000 a year for services like I do the government, shouldn’t I expect them to move mountains? I could hire 3 people, paying them in the top 50% a year with how much I pay in taxes! At least that way while I am working 65 hours a week someone can be home to feed my dog, wash my clothes and all of the other things I don’t have time to do while working my rear off.

    [Reply]

  10. October 12th, 2011 at 13:58 | #10

    I’m fine with the 1%. Most people are. Very few people are angry at the cardiologists, actors, and athletes that make the top 1%. What I’m not OK with, along with the OWS crowd, is how the government caters to the 1% at the cost of the 99%.

    The whole 1%/99% thing is a catchy gimmick, I don’t take it literally. But I do think there is a real problem with the distribution of wealth, and I do think the government is at fault. As long as we have legal corporate donations and professional lobbyists this unnatural uncapitalistic distribution will exist.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I went to a fund raiser the other day, and it was SO clear that money = power and access. The thing is, there are tons of really rich people who don’t work on Wall St. Let’s either rage against them all or just be at peace.

    [Reply]

  11. October 12th, 2011 at 14:10 | #11

    Not close to the 1% yet in income or wealth. I admire the innovation and drive required to climb to this level. However, It bothers me that the super rich are still rich when the economy tanks and so many others are suffering.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Hi Hunter, may I ask why the rich don’t bother you when the economy is great? There will always be rich, middle, and poor no?

    [Reply]

    Hunter @ Financially Consumed Reply:

    When the economy is firing there is more opportunity for everyone; lower probability of the most disadvantaged people being left in poverty. There’s a big difference between having no job/income and depending on hand-outs compared to having a job and a prosperous future. The top 1% don’t feel this sharp distinction in good and bad times quite the same way.

    [Reply]

    Cheryl Reply:

    The idea of poverty in this country is a joke. Besides the fact that people find it more important to have an IPhone than health insurance, the “poor” includes people like my son who is 23, a part-time student, living at home, and paying zero taxes (despite the fact that his only expense is gas for his car). It includes those families who didn’t bother to get married (40% of white babies are born out of wedlock) and game the tax system. Dad takes the mortgage interest, property taxes, and other deductions. Mom claims the kids and gets money back that she didn’t even put in. Enlisted families collect foodstamps because their qualification excludes their tax free housing allowance (a huge benefit that most don’t have). Half of this country doesn’t have to pay a dime of income tax. Enough already with the “poor.” There are real poor, whose kids are stuck in failng schools, but we can’t fix that, can we? It would tick off teacher unions and the politicians would have to go home without their votes.

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I hope everybody can spend a month in India… anywhere in India to see poverty. It is shocking how bad it is there, and how good it is here!

    Perhaps you’ll enjoy this newest article on Financial Samurai: http://www.financialsamurai.com/2012/04/02/is-paying-taxes-a-form-of-charity/

  12. October 12th, 2011 at 15:26 | #12

    The rich is an easy target because we can only identify the very rich like the Forbes 400. The rich I know worked hard to create a company or sufficient wealth to retire. I do not know anyone who inherited wealth. Railing against them is similar to complaining, it does nothing for you. The best solution is to do something about it. Afterall they (rich people) did!

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    What I’m trying to point out is that the rich are more ubiquitous than we think. $380,000 is an awesome income, however it takes a lot of work, sometimes a lot of debt, and often times living in an expensive city to make that money.

    The people are angry, fine. Just direct it at the one’s who get the $10 million severance package after running the company into the ground ad not the “rank and file”.

    [Reply]

  13. October 12th, 2011 at 15:42 | #13

    I guess I should have been a football coach! I wonder if that only requires a credential in pe? Shoot. I picked the wrong subject! At least I can always look forward to being a top Blogger.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Haha, yep! But unfortunately, I think there are literally zero female college football coaches!

    You should start a movement.

    Being a top blogger is definitely a possibility! $32,000 a month in online income here we come!

    [Reply]

  14. Rob Torres
    October 12th, 2011 at 21:40 | #14

    My son-in-law is a 1%. He went to medical school and joined a practice after working his butt off as an intern. And he still works his butt off. I don’t want a society where we all get equal pay,…I want a merit society, where you get rewarded for working competently. I’m also not naive enough to think that everyone gets ahead by being ethical. I’ve seen enough people lie and steal in my lifetime. But if you earned your money on your own merit, then you should be able to decide what you do with it,…not by some mob yelling in the street about equality,…..forced equality is a house built on sand.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    That’s great your son in law is busting his butt to become a doctor! Just got a reader e-mail contribution with a similar story.

    Unfortunately, he will probably get his wages garnished by others who feel they deserve more. He’ll still do OK though!

    [Reply]

  15. October 12th, 2011 at 22:09 | #15

    Im actually really surprised that making only 380k a year classifies you as already being in the top 1% of income earners. Who decides this?

    With all my businesses combined I make anywhere from 25k to 30k a month. Granted thats better than the majority of people I know, I have never felt rich actually far from it. Everywhere I look there are way more people driving nicer cars than me and living in bigger houses. Shoot, I dont even own a home yet, still saving so I can do an all cash transaction instead of getting a loan.

    [Reply]

    Investor Junkie Reply:

    Who decides? statistics.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    25-30k/month is great online income! What are your various online businesses? Come educate us so we can all get there! Perhaps a guest post yes?

    Thx

    [Reply]

    Robin Reply:

    not online income. I run 3 chinese foot massage business here in Los Angeles

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Gotcha. So is that 25-30K a month in net profit? How many hours a week do you work as I’m fascinated by different businesses.

    Is it worth doing?

    Robin Reply:

    that is net profit. The draw back is I work 7 days a week usually 10+ hours if you factor in the drive. I have not had a vacation in more than 2 years. The most important thing is basically the location and how much competition you have in the area. I have one shop in fresno, one in ventura, and one in santa clarita.

    I actually trying to sell my shop in fresno, its too hard to manage and the drive is just way too long.

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    If you hired assistant managers/masseuse with some stake, how much would your totally net drop? Could be worth it for peace of mind and not having to work yeah?

    Robin Reply:

    I already have managers at each store. I have a lead massage therapist at each store that I pay an extra base salary to manage the store and answer phone calls. The problem is that there is a myriad of unforeseen problems that need to be dealt with everyday some of which they are not able to solve. this is the problem with the services industry and especially where the services being provided is done by people. Take for example issues like.

    I had a lady that threatened to sue because she said she was injured by one of my workers who applied too much pressure.

    Workers that get into fights with each other over who should get a customer even though I have a system in place and making a scene at the shop.

    Customers that try to skip on the bill (yes that does happen)

    Employees not showing up to work. I call them and find out they are already on a plane to New York where another business promised them they will make more money per day, leaving me short on manpower and scrambling to find replacements.

    Employees that try to short change me and not report the correct number of customers per day (Now I have cameras installed through out and have a live stream to my laptop for each shop)

    There are so many more problems that the list just keeps going on and on. The most important thing is that in any services business, your best customers are your repeat customers. At each of shops I have a base of regulars that comes in 2 or 3 times a month. This is the core of my business. I have good rapport with many of the customers and often times before they sit around and have tea with me when they are done. Or when its very busy and there is a wait I’m there to chit chat to pass the time so they would not just get up a leave. That is why I have to be around.

    I agree I need to get better with management because in its current state the business model is not very scalable. I have plans of getting the masseuse license for all states so I can open in malls outside of California. Just need to find trustworthy people to help me and come up with a better management system.

    But with any business the amount of financial reward is directly proportional to the amount of work and sacrifice you put in .

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Yikes man, that sounds like you’ve got your hands full! I can totally see all that stuff come up. It makes one appreciate good employees! You always think it’s a given, but after reading your comment, it’s far from it.

    I wonder why other people who want to make more money don’t just do what you are doing. That must be frustrating that the government wants to tax you MORE after you are putting all your blood, sweat, and tears into it!

    [Reply]

    Tawster Reply:

    Most folks who are driving nice cars don’t own them. Many people who own nice houses bought more than they can afford. Most folks that have student loans got them because “working through school is hard!” – surprise.

    Hence… they will always be broke and wonder why and then blame other people.

    Don’t try to keep up with the Joneses…. cuz the Joneses are broke.

    Note1: I have no credit cards. Own 3 cars outright (none of them “nice”). I worked my way through school. And will soon have my house paid off.

    Note2: I started with nothing. Nada. Zilch.

    Note3: I may never be in the top 1%, but I will be just fine. :)

    Note4: Not a fan of “legislate to protect people from their own stupidity” but would be a fan of comprehensive “life skills” financial education from an early age.

    [Reply]

    Cheryl Reply:

    Won’t it be sad when they meanstest Social Security and those who paid off their homes, lived frugally so they’d have a nice retirement get screwed over? The government changes the rules as you go along. I remember how hard it was to save every month for our kids’ college fund. We went without a lot to buy those savings bonds each month. We did it because it was to be tax free interest. Then we cash them in to pay for college and found that our family income put us out of that “benefit.” This was before the Bush tax cuts that included the capital gains cut. So we paid 28% on something we thought was interest free. No fun being responsible. I refuse to put my assets in trust as I’m encouraged to do. What will stop the government from changing the rules on that too? Nothing is really ours with a government that thinks it’s all theirs.

    [Reply]

  16. October 13th, 2011 at 05:08 | #16

    Really an awesome post Sam.
    Great stuff.

    It clearly highlights in plain language that the 1% are everywhere, especially amongst those that so many Americans are lionizing while protesting at the same time.

    Oh, and what’s Krugman make?

    [Reply]

    Investor Junkie Reply:

    Or what about Michael Moore? I always love how many play into they are the “common man” when they are anything but.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Ah yes, Michael Moore. I’ve added him, thx!

    [Reply]

  17. October 13th, 2011 at 09:20 | #17

    Most excellent article!!!

    I have no problem with the top 1%! I applaud them for being ambitious and productive.

    I believe the world is a better place because of many of the top 1%! What if Ford didn’t make cars because he made enough working for Edison, and what if Edison didn’t want to make things because he didn’t want to be in the top 1%? The world would be drastically different!

    Shoot, if Columbus didn’t want to get rich by trying a new shipping route that he believe would be quicker and yield more profits, America as we know it would be drastically different. Many of us would be much, much poorer than we are today living in America.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Thanks Don! Not sure if Columbus is the he’s example since he caused the near extermination of the native American race. However, I do agree with Henry Ford!

    [Reply]

    Money Reasons Reply:

    Indirectly, I suppose he may have. Although, I don’t think he had any conflict with the Indians, it was those that came after him.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Gotcha, thx Don.

  18. October 13th, 2011 at 20:15 | #18

    When did the “American Dream” become getting as much of a government handout as possible, and not chasing the 1%? Isn’t marketing America as the best place to become a “1%er” what made the American Dream, and largely responsible for becoming an economic leader?

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I don’t know, but it’s pretty embarrassing. People should feel happy for other people’s successes, and try to aspire to follow their lead if we want to better ourselves.

    The world is laughing at us.

    [Reply]

  19. October 13th, 2011 at 20:59 | #19

    Someday, my name will be included on that list… Look for it under Online Infopreneurs… Watch out!

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Awesome! That will be a great day. Stick with it!

    [Reply]

  20. Evil1Percenter
    October 13th, 2011 at 21:21 | #20

    I’ve been a graphic designing, web developing, incredibly hard working, and extremely ambitious entrepreneur for about 13 years. While more than capable, I barely graduated high school, and dropped out of two different colleges. I never earned a degree, and consider college one of my worst investments. I’ve worked hard for my self-proclaimed “genius” title, and up until 2008, I was a brilliant 25%’er. In 2008 I joined the top 10%, and joined the top 5% in 2009. As of 2011 YTD, at 32 years old, I am apparently an “evil, greedy” 1%’er.

    My wife, a teacher at the time, and I started our business in 2007. In 2008 we found our niche, quit our jobs, and have been working tirelessly ever since. We went from working in the living room of a small house that we did not own, to a 10,000 sq ft production facility with 20 employees, and we’re working on expanding. We sell our products online and produce them by hand in the US with almost all American made materials and supplies.

    I never talk about our success without making sure that it’s known that half of it was dumb luck. We never would have found our niche if a friend hadn’t asked us if we could do it. The other half came from recognizing and pursuing the opportunity we saw. It came from a passion to be successful, dedication, risk and sacrifice, heated debates, lost sleep and all-nighters, countless hours of work and huge amounts of stress. Maybe it’s just coincidence, but I wasn’t going bald before we started the business.

    Work never stops for us either. My office is in my head, so I’m always at work, and if for some reason I’m not at work, I’m thinking about work. We were having dinner with our neighbors, and fellow successful small business owners last night. They asked what we did for fun and we both instantly replied “work!”

    What’s frustrating to me is that to this day, the biggest checks I have ever written have been made payable to the IRS. This is just estimated, but after paying our 2011 taxes, we will have paid more in taxes in the past three years than my entire lifetime income before our business. $100 is still $100 to me, and to see that kind of money just disappear (knowing that we could put it to such good use growing our business!) is gut wrenching.

    After our first big tax hit, I pretty much got over the money. It comes and goes unbelievably quick. I’m much prouder of our accomplishments in building a successful business than the money we’ve made, and I could careless about being a 1%’er. No matter how much money I earn, I’ll always have an average sized penis just like the rest of you.

    Great article! I thoroughly enjoyed it! I found it searching for “who are the top 1%” in Google. Just subscribed to your feed.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I love your story and your progress Evil 1%er!

    I hear you on the biggest checks you ever written is to the IRS. That is damn sickening indeed! If only the government could be more efficient, or take our money to help DIRECTLY THE POOR! But no, they’ve gotta spend it on overseas wars, appeasing lobbyists and other bullshit.

    Good to have you man!

    [Reply]

    Squirrelers Reply:

    Agreed totally that it would be nice to see money directly help the poor. Rather, it sometimes gets redistributed to other ’causes’ and people that are not deserving and of course don’t deserve it. Such massive inefficieny, and entitlement, is practically gross negligence.

    [Reply]

    Marie at FamilyMoneyValues Reply:

    Same here on our biggest checks going to the IRS! Adding insult to injury is the torturous – complex tax code we have to wade through each year in order to figure out what that big check amount should be. Adding more insult, the check we write out each year was most likely spent before it was received by U. Sam.

    You have my admiration Evil 1%er!

    I thought I was doing good to get into the top 10!

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Honestly.. the complexity of the tax code really makes me want to pull my hair out and not work so I don’t have to pay taxes anymore.

    Everyday Tips Reply:

    Keep on working hard, many people need your money! :)

    [Reply]

  21. October 14th, 2011 at 03:33 | #21

    I see a decent number of responses here from people that strive to be “1%’rs”. Those of us that do strive for that really need to be vigilant in these times. It is the people making the noise in these protests that are going to be driving change. And that’s not a good thing.

    My wife works in philanthropy. I continually am impressed at the huge sums of money “1%’rs” give to charity and other great causes. Be careful what you ask for protesters. I find it funny they want them to pay their “fair share” (but dont define that). But, by paying their “fair share” you end up driving money from these causes to the government (which is incompetent).

    What kind of mission statement is that??

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Thanks for sharing your wife’s story. On an absolute level, not only do the 1%ers pay the most taxes, they also give the most. So, I question why the government wants to remove the interest tax deductibility to fund all these jobs. It’s screwing Paul to pay Peter!

    http://www.financialsamurai.com/2010/04/01/why-are-president-obama-and-democrats-against-charity-tax-breaks/

    [Reply]

  22. October 14th, 2011 at 07:06 | #22

    I hate taxes and I am so sick of the ‘rich’ being villified. Where would the world be without people out there busting their butts to make good money? Should people sitting in parks protesting the top one percent be admired instead? Maybe if people weren’t sitting around whining constantly and instead getting an education and working hard they wouldn’t have time to worry about what other people make.

    The example this country is setting for the youth is scary.

    [Reply]

    Zippy Reply:

    Greece?

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I’m trying to get to Greece this week, and we can’t b/c all the dockworkers are on strike! Lol!

    Shitake mushroom you not!

    [Reply]

  23. October 14th, 2011 at 14:14 | #23

    Those people are so evil. How dare they earn so much money? They should be punished for for working hard and/or working smart to make that money. Why not take from them and give to those who did nothing to earn it? It’s just not fair. They’re inherently bad.

    Kidding, of course. Interestingly, there are some that think that way though. Jealously is human nature, no matter how illogically misguided.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Well that’s what I’m wondering. Why are the well-to-doers OK in making money in the good times, but NOT in the bad times?

    [Reply]

  24. 2cents
    October 15th, 2011 at 04:06 | #24

    Hey guys, I agree with Brave New Life that most of you are taking “99%” too literally and are missing the point. The occupiers are not concerned about hardworking entrepreneurs and doctors and those of you bringing in $250K. They are not even concerned about professional athletes bringing in millions. The athletes are not lobbying Congress to deregulate their industry so they can blatantly swindle the middle class.

    As Warren Buffet points out, the uber wealthy make the bulk of their income from investments. Long-term capital gains are taxed at just 15%, compared to wages which are taxed at up to 35%. That’s a whopping 20% tax break for passive income compared to actual labor, no?

    Again, it really is about corporations having too much political clout and Congress protecting the top 0.1% at the expense of the 99.9%.

    And Cashflowman, with his gazillions in Apple stock at least Steve Jobs drew a salary of just $1.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    You sure about that? I’m watching their protest spread against EVERYBODY who has more than them. Observe closely, and you will see.

    [Reply]

    top 5% Reply:

    I totally agree with 2cents. certainly some protesters are misled, just like most movements, only some know what they are protesting. there is a saying, making the 1st M is very difficult, most dont make it, but after that, the money is snowballing. these are the people should be capped.
    BTW, we should cancel inheritance. especially those who get a windfall. tax 99% of them. being born to which family has no choice, but being a productive member of the society is a choice. but still we need to have a good family education to bring to that mentality. education, education and more education. most money should be spent on that.

    [Reply]

  25. NotInTheTop
    October 15th, 2011 at 06:18 | #25

    I think most of the protesters are clueless. And I think a lot of them are there because of envy, frustration, a sense of entitlement, or a combination of all three. I certainly don’t begrudge the top 1% their money. I know most of them worked hard to earn it.

    If I WERE in the top 1% (or anywhere close) I would print thousands of copies of this article and pass it out to those protesters to read.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Thanks, you still can, or at least share the article with everyone you know :)

    [Reply]

  26. BD
    October 15th, 2011 at 15:58 | #26

    I’m not the 1%, nor will I ever be (just the facts, not trying to be a downer).
    But there is NO way I’d ever villify them. The OWS protestors are idiots. Have they not learned to “not bite the hand that feeds them”?

    The top 1% are the people who own companies, who hire millions of workers. Why would the OWS want them to go down? If the top 1% was demonized, and punished, millions of people like myself will have an even rougher time finding employment, and millions more will join us in unemployment. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you!

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Because when you are down and out already, you want to bring everybody down with you.

    [Reply]

    BD Reply:

    What? That doesn’t even make any sense. I am AGAINST the Occupy Wall Street.
    I don’t want the top 1% to go down. They need to stay in place where they are, so they can continue to provide jobs!

    I don’t want people to come down with me, I want to go UP, with everyone else.
    So…I’m not sure why you commented the way you did.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Just explaining to you why people are protesting. When people are down, they want to bring others down with them. Stay away from pessimists.

    BD Reply:

    Oh, I see. I thought that you were using the word “you” to mean “me”…not the OWS protestors. Sorry!

  27. DB
    October 15th, 2011 at 19:36 | #27

    It really doesn’t occur to any of you that the vast majority of these people are overpaid? There are several people that have finished 11 years of secondary education that are making $50,000 a year with no benefits to educate your children. This is not due to them being lazy (many work over 70 hours a week after all is said and done), or stupid (if you think it’s easy to get a PhD, you don’t have one). That aside, this article severely over-simplifies the issue, as do most since space is short. Hence my over-simplified response. /the other side

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Overpaid? You earn whatever you are willing to accept and whatever incremental income you generate.

    You can spend 11 years of your life learning philosophy, and if you are not a great philosopher who can’t teach, come up with something new, write a book, speak to people, etc.. yes, you will not get paid.

    Come on now. You know better.

    [Reply]

  28. Shelley
    October 16th, 2011 at 02:38 | #28

    Great article! I’ve been wondering about who the 1% are and found your site. Also found a misleading article on Mother Jones about the 1%, which claimed that they earned more than a million and up, then noticed that it included capital gains. Well, if I earned more than 350,000 a year, I hope I would have the sense to invest some of my income and make some capital gains.

    Wall Street is not the problem, but a symptom of the problem of corrupt government. Wall Street does not get away with anything without the collusion of government. It’s the wrong target. But I guess they can’t draw too much attention to Obama’s corruption otherwise who would they vote for in the next election?

    The comment previous to mine is discouraging. Someone doesn’t understand the market. These people will be overpaid when the market decides that they’re overpaid at which time they will be paid less. Teachers unions and their members are supported by tax dollars, from earned incomes, from people making 25 or 30 thousand a year and up. That earned income taken by the government is then given to other people, like teachers. I guess most teachers want to earn more money, but this system has a lot of constraints, obviously. Of course, teachers could always dump their unions and work in the market system, subject to performance and demand. Take your pick. Neither is perfect.

    I might support the protestors if they would provide a rationale but so far they haven’t. The protests lack focus which I gather is intentional, while they gather steam and attract a lot of people with different agendas, some of which have nothing to do with money. So I guess we’ll see what they come up with eventually, but until then I can’t take them seriously.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    DB’s comment is discouraging indeed. Which makes me wonder if more like him/her think that way, which means no wonder why they are protesting and screwing themselves.

    Mother Jones said the 1% earn more than $1 million is true, but a lie since the cutoff starts much lower at $380,000.

    Thanks for stopping by.

    [Reply]

    originalslicey Reply:

    Moveon.org is also reporting the figures of the Top 1% starting at over $1.1 Million. They are including capital gains in their figures instead of the more accurate Adjusted Gross Income or taxable income.

    I’ve seen the chart comparing the >$1Million 1%ers to the $33K %99ers floating around alot.

    I’ve enjoyed reading your articles and the comments on this issue. I especially agree with the comment about achieving the Top 1% as being part of the American dream and that the new American dream ideal included way too much entitlement instead of hard work.

    I’m not sure that OWS realizes that their movement has been hijacked – I think with everyone jumping on the bandwagon, the point of the original protest has really been missed by most.

    [Reply]

  29. Mike Hunt
    October 16th, 2011 at 03:22 | #29

    Hi Sam,

    I’ve been a 1%er in 3 of the last 6 years, based on the level of bonus pay. In 2011 I will come up short.

    I’ve already told my story so nothing special- just hard work and delivering results.

    Oh and even though I’m an American I only made that kind of money after I left the country- so I’m not sure what statistical group I should fall in.

    -Mike

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Mike, what happened to the other 3 years? Were those during the crisis or the first 2 years of the six and this year? Does it feel weird breaking that level and going back?

    [Reply]

    Mike Hunt Reply:

    Actually the down years were 2009- terrible financial year so low bonus.

    2011 is another one of the years.

    It’s just a number so I didn’t think about breaking in and out of it until I read this post.

    -Mike

    [Reply]

  30. Error
    October 16th, 2011 at 08:14 | #30

    Fact check: The UC Regents are not paid “$300,000+”. They receive no compensation for their university service.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    You are correct! I meant to write Chancellors. Thx.

    [Reply]

  31. October 16th, 2011 at 16:29 | #31

    I also agree that getting in the top 1% takes time and effort. I am personally working my butt off to make it there. I think if more people worked to their full potential the top 1% would be more like top 50%.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Good luck on your journey. And guess what? If more people do so, the breadth of people making $380,000 increases, and that’s good for everyone!

    [Reply]

  32. October 17th, 2011 at 11:01 | #32

    The $380 per year income standard is overly simplistic. Other authors point to a Net Worth analysis and look at levels of $1.2 to $5.0 m in Net Worth, with individuals earning within a range of $300 – $500k. This would likely NOT include some of the folks mentioned in the article.

    REF:
    http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html
    http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/investment_manager.html

    But the Occupy movement is more about the complex realities of the fact that 85% of Americans can only claim 20% of the country’s wealth. And, that beyond net worth, that the lower 85% portion of the population are dramatically more impacted by expenses for basic items such as food, health care, education, transportation etc…

    Also, there are claims that since the 1970′s onward, the new wealth generated due to productivity gains and general economic activities have benefited primarily the top 5% – 20%, with the middle (60%) having stagnate wages and the lowest 20% actually lossing ground in terms of family incomes. A double whammy to mention is not just the stagnate or lower family incomes, but also the fact that since the 1970′s there has been a large entry of two parents being employed, and worse, the social erosion of the family, with a growing number of single parents that often work more than one job.

    So, it is not just a wealth inequity issue, it is a equity issue overall and a power issue of how government spending and policies flow to the top 5% and corporate interests…and the bottom 95% that includes most if not all of small businesses shoulder the majority of burden in terms of their personal work/productivity, the expenses and services they’re able to receive and ultimately their quality of life and security.

    Brian Cummins
    Cleveland City Council
    Cleveland, Ohio USA

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    So it has now moved to the “bottom 95%” now from the 99%? This is EXACTLY what I’m hoping for! I want to see an all out battle of the bottom 50% vs. the top 50% as people everywhere who pay taxes, and who want to improve themselves get sick and tired of the protests.

    [Reply]

    Brian Cummins Reply:

    It’s realistically more like the 80% who hold 20% of the nations wealth battling the systems, political and economic, that have developed a society that has the top 20% controlling 80% of the nation’s wealth. It’s not a battle of people, it is one of values and priorities. Corporate profits generated by global corporations that are more concerned with short-term shareholder value than long-term value and benefits to the corporation and the people they serve and the natural resources they abuse are the issue, along with the political system that allows it.

    You can try to spin as a pick your boot straps up, everyone can be a millionaire – but that argument is bunk. It is part of the fallacy of the modern American dream. The vast majority of American feel the funk of a stagnate or decreasing family income and lowering of the quality of life. Lottery tickets, periodic dinners at Apple bee’s and a new leased car can only make people feel so good and secure. The truth a large part of the lower 80% are a paycheck or two away from poverty.

    [Reply]

    Tony Duhon Reply:

    Mr. Cummins, you of all respondents to this article have made the most sense.
    The author does make a good point, but your comments have added much value
    to his. Thank you.

    Success is a good thing. Corruption is not.

  33. David
    October 18th, 2011 at 22:21 | #33

    Nobody is against the 1%, they are simply being asked to contribute more with the economy through a more proportional taxation. If you make over 350k God bless you, but you know you could put some more on the table compared to what a worker making 6.50 an hour working 8 hours a day on a line could. Yeah yeah yeah, why should you? is your money, well, sometimes helping others mean helping yourself, if such contributions help the economy in the long term then is good for everyone, rich people need poor people that can buy their products or services.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    You sure nobody is against the 1%? Have you been reading the papers and the internet news for the past month?

    Proportional tax? You mean a system where we are taxed equally after a certain level? I’m all for it. Fight for the people David and help abolish this current system of unfairness!

    [Reply]

    Tony Duhon Reply:

    I’m so glad you finally state your true intent. :0)

    [Reply]

  34. Mountn_Man
    October 20th, 2011 at 02:30 | #34

    Zero and his minions rail about the rich, and paying their “fair share”, and shared sacrifice in this down economic time.

    I’m just a dumb construction worker. But I’m in the top 11-13%

    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was delivering papers from age 11-15
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was bussing tables from age 15-17
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was working at a hot dog joint and going to college.
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I had my first welding job.
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I took a cut in pay to get into the building trades.
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was driving a $1000 truck when my income was $75k+
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was 200′ up on a tower and it was 3° out.
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was working 16 hour days, for a week straight.
    I don’t remember “shared” sacrifice when I was working 7 days a week, 12 hour days for months on end.

    I have a cousin whose husband recently ran into some legal problems (I believe of his own making)
    They were in some serious financial problems, about 5 years ago, and were about to lose their house. Her husband took out money from his 401k to save the house (I have no problem with that) but while he was getting money to save the house, he also got money out to buy a cheap, beat up fishing boat and a beat to snot travel trailer, and an old motorcycle. I called them fools for doing that, and was told “they just wanted what other people had” (Never mind that the person they’re telling this to-me- makes 4 times what they make, and doesn’t have those things). 3 years later they got tired of making payments on the house. My uncle died, and they needed his house more than any of my other cousins, so they moved in. Free of course.
    About 2 years ago a legal issue happened with my cousins husband, now he’s in jail. Of course, he’s innocent (rolls eyes) and its all their defense attorneys fault. As they had a public defender.

    I mention this because, my cousin and I are just a few months different in age. She’s 49 and has NEVER had a REAL job in her life. She’s always babysat somebody’s kid/s, but not in a daycare center way. She once told me “SHE’D NEVER work at McDonalds, those people had no class” and yet her husband was a carni (carnival worker) when they met and got married.

    Never once, with ALL the financial problems they had did my cousin ever get a real job, that would have paid her better money, more consitantly. Never did her husband ever go get a part time job to supplement their income. Never have either one of them ever gone to the community college, to take classes to improve themselves. And yes, they still own the motorcycle, the boat and ANOTHER travel trailer (yes another piece of trash. But its a BIGGER piece of trash, than the other one.) (which they still have)

    And yet “I’M LUCKY”

    Yeah, the harder you work, the luckier you get.
    What a loser calls luck, a winner calls hard work.

    Our society today tells us there should be no consequences to bad decisions.
    When others succeed its called luck.

    I’ve come to believe that we are all psychological projectors.
    From Wikipedia:
    “Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person subconsciously denies his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, usually to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others originate those feelings.”

    Those who call others “lucky” are they themselves the ones looking to “luck” to provide for them.

    Those who call the wealthy, lazy or cheaters or stingy, are they themselves lazy or stingy or cheaters.

    I’m proud of WHO I am. What I am. What I have. And what I have accomplished. It might not be a lot by some standards, but I earned it, and I am happy and content with all I am and all I have.

    Because of this inlook upon myself, I suppose it affects my outlook on others. I mean, I’m PROUD of the hard work I do. I’m PROUD of going above and beyond the average. Because of this pride in my work ethic and accomplishments, I assume that others who have succeeded have also done it the same way I did. Maybe their work is different than mine. Maybe their circumstances are different. But the hunger, the desire, the viewpoints on work and success HAVE to be similar. Right???

    It goes back to projecting. How can I be proud of the work I do, proud of the sacrifices I’ve made, proud of all my accomplishments, and yet think that somebody who is as or more accomplished than I am, who has more than me, has come about it any different than I have.

    Which then makes me look at others, who view others as lazy or cheaters or stingy or just lucky, and wonder if maybe they view that in others because thats who they are inside.

    Which brings me to the subject of this article. Who Are The Top 1% Income Earners?
    Are they like me? Proud of they’re accomplishments, hard working and ambitious. Or are they lazy or cheaters or stingy or greedy or just plain lucky?

    From a young age, I was taught to be fair. Not to have double standards.
    To me, that means if one standard to judge somebody is used, that same standard should be applied to all others.
    That applies to taxation as well. Whats good for one is good for the other. If one has 15% taxation, the other should have it as well.

    I guess it all comes down to what the Bible calls coveting.
    Exodus 20:17 “Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that [is] thy neighbour’s.”

    But people today will say “I’m not coveting a rich mans possessions”.
    Maybe they don’t want them or admit to wanting. But the reality is they don’t want the rich man to have them either.

    During Obamas presidential campaign, he was asked about raising taxes. He said yes. Asked if he’d still do it if it hurt the economy, he said yes, to make things more fair.

    If you’ve never read it, read Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Thank you Mountain Man for sharing your story!

    You should be damn proud, and nobody should be embarrassed by their successes!

    Screw the people who think working at McDonald’s is beneath them. I worked there and it built a ton of character. I SALUTE anybody who works at any minimum wage job, keeps at it and just wants to get ahead!

    [Reply]

    Scott Reply:

    I wish more people thought like you!

    [Reply]

  35. Michael Carmody
    October 22nd, 2011 at 09:46 | #35

    Let me start by saying I am not in the 1% and I am perfectly happy. I was a public sector worker whose paycheck,pension and healthcare are paid for by the people who pay income taxes. I would like to say thank you. I worked in a neighborhood that had 48% of the people on government assistance and very few paid any taxes. All I heard from the residents of this particular neighborhood was complaints and a VERY LARGE SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT. People there were given far more Police, Fire and Teachers including new schools , than I have ever recieved in any place that i have ever lived. I pay a large school tax now and our schools are crumbling. I think it is easy to sit point the finger and complain. Look at what you have and be grateful. I would never work in that situation again. To hell with the whiners and complainers. Entire neighborhoods are destroyed but somehow it is always someone elses fault and there responsibility to fix it.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Mike, I want to say Thank You for saying Thank You! Folks have got to change their idea of what others can do for them and to what they can do for others!

    [Reply]

  36. Ted
    October 23rd, 2011 at 15:16 | #36

    I am in the 1%, I guess, and it took a long time to get there. I won’t be there that long because I don’t intend to work at that level forever. I attended dental school in the 70′s, and then joined the Army where I served as a dental officer for 16 years. Rather than retiring from the Army, I elected to exit and have been very happy in private practice where I have seen my income rise over the years. Without a doubt, I have been blessed. 8 years of school with no income, 16 years of government service at substandard wages for the industry, and now going on 15 years in private practice. Private practice means running your own business as well as treating patients, building a reputation and developing a trusting relationship with a community. It doesn’t just get handed to you.

    So what do I think about sharing more through taxation? By my last count, I am already sharing more through taxation. In addition, I give 10-12% per year in charitable contributions to worthwhile organizations. My take on the subject is that you have little respect for what you get for free. Everyone making a contribution vests everyone in the system. Targeting those of us that are finally enjoying the fruits of our labor is attractive to those who feel they know how to spend our money better than we do. But it is wrong.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    “You have little respect for what you an get for free.”. That sir, is a crucial truth which I wholeheartedly agree with.

    [Reply]

  37. David
    October 29th, 2011 at 04:31 | #37

    I am pretty close to the top 1% (although I only broke into this lovely income level when I moved over here to socialist Germany), and had to kinda chuckle at the simple assertion that those of us who earn highly are there because we worked harder. There are certainly many people making lots of money because they worked hard, and there are also lots of people who were fortunate enough to be born into wealthy families – wealth tends to perpetuate wealth.

    The horatio alger story is a good method to keep the plebs from rising up against the reality that they are likely never going to become well off despite how hard they work, but in reality hard work (and even that is sometimes optional) is far less of a factor than luck – both situational luck, luck that you don’t get sick when you are uninsured in school, luck to be born to a connected family, luck to be gifted with the right talents, etc.

    Successful people shouldn’t be criticized, but the right winger assumption that people who are not sucessful are just lazy and have inherent character flaws is laughable.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Share with us what you do in Germany? Almost in the 1% isn’t in the 1% though. You’ll get something in the mail if you do.

    [Reply]

  38. Oscar
    October 29th, 2011 at 21:24 | #38

    According to the stats I have read based on either income or net worth I’m one of those in the 1%. I’m 43 and I’ve worked hard since I graduated college 22 years ago. I will admit that I was a bit lucky getting involved in the computer field early on, but I did everything “right” to get here. I got a BS degree in Computer Science, I went to work out of college for a good company and worked 40-70 hours a week learning everything I could. I had great mentors and then 10 years ago I decided to try my hands at my own company. After 10 years of hard work we have about 30 employees and we are moderately successful. Even with all of this my wife works full-time because she believes in working and contributing to the family and contributing to our retirement future.

    I know we are lucky in many ways and many may think we don’t have to worry about anything, but that’s far from the truth. In my business at any point clients can stop paying or we can get sued. Since insurance is a big question mark for the future my wife has to work to make sure she gets to retirement so that she can “lock-in” on medical insurance for our future. With college for our children we want to make sure we can afford it. Again I know we are in a better position than most but we still worry and we still work very hard.

    As for taxes I think we paid over $130k in taxes last year! Honestly I’m not sure if I should be paying more in taxes because of a highest percentage or not. I know that I’m more capable of hiring someone and giving them a good life than someone else because plain and simple I run a business and I will keep the business going so that others can have a job. I’m not being cocky here, just stating facts. There are many employees who work for me who are better computer programmers but they couldn’t really run a business. In order for me to be successful (which means everyone in the company is successful and has a job) I need the following:

    - taxes can’t be too high. If I start paying too much in taxes I won’t try as hard to make money (honestly). Why try to earn $100 when I have to pay $60 (just an example).
    - make health care not a concern for me as a business owner or as an individual getting older.

    Really that’s it. This country is great and I love this country. My grandparents came here because this country gave them possibility. My grandfather came here at 14 by himself with no money and a 5th grade education. He fought in WWII and worked 7 days a week. He made a life for his family and his children and grand children reaped the benefits of his hard work. That’s what it is to being an American. I believe in hard work, helping others, and working together. I’m not a democrat nor a republican nor an independent – I’m an American.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Oscar, I love your story and I want to thank you for working hard and providing people jobs! People shouldn’t attack you for being successful. They should THANK YOU and look up to you to see how they can get ahead as well.

    [Reply]

  39. Grim
    October 30th, 2011 at 11:32 | #39

    There’s an element to his op-ed that he is missing. when there is a path to that kind of wealth in the market place, there is a huge middle class. the reason is that making that kind of wealth is not supposed to be binary. That is, it isn’t you are in the “in club” and get appointed CEO or you are not and therefore must make close to minimum wage. The contract is supposed to be what the author stated, work hard and you will move up the ladder. Only the exceptional will make it to the very top, but making it to the top 50% should be a noticeable improvement. Making it to the top 20% should be substantial. Making it to the top 10% should put the top 1% in relative view. But over the past 30 years we’ve seen putting in your time and effort and moving up the rungs has become less about effort and more about luck, and the lower rungs have become much more tenuous than the upper rungs. And executives are more often than not political appointees, not people who worked their way up through the ranks and who know the business well.

    For example, if you’re a mid-level manager with a couple of years behind you it would probably take a year of unemployment, possibly much less, before every single thing you own is gone. Everything you worked for is history. If you’re in the political class, first you don’t lose your job for doing it really badly, your employees lose theirs. Second, you don’t lose any personal wealth, people with retirement funds lose theirs. Third, if you do get let go, you don’t even stop getting paid for a year.

    The media want this turned into a class war between rich and poor but that is not what this is. It is a class war between the politically connected who always pay for their mistakes out of our wallets, and the people trying to follow the rules, get an education, work hard, and who still lose everything not because of what they do, but because of the small handful of politically connected executives who control the retirement wealth and jobs of literally millions of people each. And who are almost all job destroyers, not job creators; who are almost all wealth destroyers, not wealth creators.

    People are not unhappy that some make millions of dollars a year in salaries. Good for them, we all want to be them. What people are really, really pissed about, is that those people have a safety net protecting every asset and that multimillion dollar salary from their own incompetence. It cost every man, woman, and child in the United States 2000 dollars each to make sure the executives at AIG who wrote insurance and did not put capital reserves away to cover it were able to keep their pay, their bonuses, their future bonuses, and all of their personal assets. Executives are supposedly compensated because of the greater risks an entrepreneur takes. But they take no personal risks at all. They walk up to the roulette wheel, put retirement savings of thousands of people on 15, and spin. If it wins, they take the lion’s share of the winnings. If it doesn’t, they turn around and make us taxpayers pick up their bar tab and cut them a check for their service.

    THAT is what everyone is pissed about.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    A mid-level manager gets wiped out in one year? Huh?

    I’ve saved up 15 years of full living expenses already, and infinity if I sell my house and move to my other paid off house. What are you talking about getting wiped out?

    [Reply]

    Tawster Reply:

    That and he or she can’t get a job mowing lawns? Cleaning offices? Delivering packages? Anything to stave off disaster? Move and find a new job in a different area? What did this hypothetical person do during that year?

    Geez. Save folks! Save for that rainy day. And work!

    [Reply]

  40. Jim
    November 1st, 2011 at 06:51 | #40

    there is no distribution of wealth, it is earned.@Brave New Life

    [Reply]

  41. Steve
    November 2nd, 2011 at 12:36 | #41

    I am in the top 1

    I am in the top1%. 20 years ago I was broke. I turned it around in 1992, got debt free,
    saved and invested my money and now I am worth probably over $5 million dollar. It can be done. Saving and investing is how this country was built. Not spending every dollar you make. It is as simple as that.

    [Reply]

  42. Bob
    November 5th, 2011 at 20:38 | #42

    I’m the son of a 1% family. I live in a fairly wealthy neighbourhood, and the first thing I would like to say is that, yes, 1%-er’s do usually live in packs. The concentration of 1%-er’s in Beverly hills is much higher than the concentration in a small town in Kansas. The area where I live has a median income three times that of the national average, and there is a small part of my area that has a high concentration of low-income people. I also would like to say that the 1% number is ridiculous. My family brings-in 600-700k a year (my father is a surgeon, so it depends on how many cases my father performs that year). However, we don’t control any significant corporations ,and have a very high regard for other people’s lives. My father worked extremely hard to cut costs so that he wouldn’t have to lay-off a single employee from his clinic. He in fact hired another nurse practitioner. We also have not cut any of our household employees such as my sister’s nanny who drives my sister and I to and from school and extra-curricular activities, our house0cleaner who comes once a week, or our landscaper who comes once a week. My dad and mom came to this country with offers from colleges and worked hard to get to where they are. I find it very unfair that people are hating us for being succesful. The only people are really targeting is the top 0.05% billionaire executives, and they need to stop using the 1% number. The minimum income for 1% is 380k, after taxes and private-school school fees for two children, that isn’t really a ton of money.

    [Reply]

  43. Karen
    November 6th, 2011 at 05:35 | #43

    after taxes and three college tuitions there is barely anything left

    [Reply]

    Tawster Reply:

    @Karen

    Are those students working? I put myself through school…. by working. They should at least be helping out.

    In my current role, I help hire a lot of folks. Sometimes we target new grads. First thing I look for: Did they work throughout school? If they did not, I don’t even bother interviewing them.

    [Reply]

  44. Ride AAPL to the 1%
    November 9th, 2011 at 13:04 | #44

    If you didn’t work your entire life to be rich, you shouldn’t be surprised or upset that you aren’t rich. Some people dream of being teachers, become teachers and live happy lives rich with fulfillment. Others dream of being rich, become rich and live happy lives rich with fulfillment. Its not the rich persons fault the teacher is not rich.

    [Reply]

  45. McKenzie
    November 15th, 2011 at 19:39 | #45

    I don’t know which cardiologists are making a million dollars…check your stats more carefully.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Really? I do. My stats are two friends who are over $1.5 mil and run their own successful practices.

    [Reply]

  46. baldman
    November 16th, 2011 at 10:24 | #46

    ows is a stupid cause

    [Reply]

  47. baldman
    November 16th, 2011 at 10:38 | #47

    i have worked in govt compliance for a long time..and recently quit because i dont like the way the govt does busniess..here is how it works..the progressive govt wants to give hand outs..they get their hand out money from tax payers..but they also have to get their paychecks too..so how does govt get more $$ to pay for exploding entitlements and salaries?? MORE TAXES…what happens is u have companies (small and large) making $$ and the govt wants some of that $$ so they impose new taxes and new regulations to get more $$…so what companies have to do is find ways to make $$..that is where little extra fees come in..thoes fees in turn make companies took like bad people that only want to turn a profit..next thing you know people are mad at companies for being evil..but its not them, its the govt..here is a little tidbit to chew on..companies move operations over seas to save money..save money on taxes..think about that for a sec..a company has to hire people, get land, buildings, materials and build its infrastructure to be able to function…so its not like it is a cheap thing to do..yet they are willing to do this because it will cost them more taxes to stay and do busniess…heck, companies from over seas come here all the time to set up shop..WHY do you ask??? same reason..to get away from these taxes..THE PROBLEM IS NOT COMPANIES…ITS GREED, GOVT CAREER POLITION GREED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Reply]

  48. November 18th, 2011 at 09:02 | #48

    Top 1% own 33.8 % of nation’s wealth. Top 1% own 50.9% of Stocks,Bonds and Mutual Funds. Top 1% take home 20% of the income.
    Top 1% – avg tax rate only 23%
    Top 1% do not pay SS tax above $110,000 income.

    CEO pay has skyrocketted 300% since 1990.
    Avg. worker pay increased only 4%.

    Now tell me what is fair.

    [Reply]

  49. David Kelley
    November 29th, 2011 at 09:14 | #49

    Hyperbole destroys arguments. I just happened to stumble on this website and was frankly shocked to see the comment about hunting down the 1%. As a member of the 1% and a business owner I don’t see class warfare in merely asking for my tax rate which is at historic lows to be raised a little. Of course it won’t even be 50% of what it was during periods of America’s greatest expansion. Isn’t it even a little patriotic to help the others in our society who helped create my wealth. Take any of us in the top 1% and put us on a desert island and we would only have what we take. We couldn’t even make a toaster. We in the top tier owe a great deal to this society and those that came before us. We wouldn’t have this without them. By “this” I mean this magnificent machine of wealth creation. And please don’t raise that argument that raising my marginal tax rate would influence the job I create. As Mark Cuban and others have pointed out. For most of us business owners that has almost no impact of any kind. Expenses in a business come out of the profits.

    I guess I am one of those people who believes that when everyone does better everyone does better. In other words, our economy hit a wall because the middle class has not created consumer demand. It is that simple. Whatever we do to help the middle class recover is essential. The recent CBO study profiles that our recent disparities in income are manufactured by policies like 15% tax rates on long term capital gains.

    Sorry but if we at the top don’t take off our blinders we will live in a society that we don’t much like where we have to retreat to our gated communities. To me that seems so un-American and anti-capitalist. I remember sections of Adam Smith warning people about when the rich get together even for “merriment” that it was not for the welfare of the others.

    Isn’t the corruption of our economy and, of course, the political system, really at the root of the Occupy movement?

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Thanks for your comment. So the question is as a 1%er, what are the steps you are doing to help our country more?

    [Reply]

  50. unbound
    January 3rd, 2012 at 16:58 | #50

    Late to the game, but an interesting article none-the-less.

    Minor note is that the $380,000 line is AGI for the top 1%, so unless the people described above don’t do things like put money into an IRA, their income is actually notably higher.

    More notable is that athletic directors (such as Jeff Tedford mentioned in the article) gets his money from donations, the public schools don’t pay him that money. So the title for the subsection is misleading in that regard, but the top chancellors at the top colleges do indeed earn very high salaries as stated.

    Personally, I think the wrong line was chosen in this whole argument. Most of the bottom of the top 1% are just high-end working Joes like everyone else…and, for those people, I agree with your last couple of paragraphs. However, it is more than a little naive to assume that all of us can get there just through hard work. There are only so many of those positions available, and not everyone is capable of operating at that level or can demonstrate the types of skills to get to that level. Think back to your high school class, do you *really* think every one of them was capable of being a doctor or maintaining a high level job no matter how hard they worked? Of course not.

    The line that people should be looking at should be much smaller…such as the top 0.00005%. There are only about 8,000 of them, but they report about 3% of all income averaging more than $10 million annually. Of course, they maintain substantially more than that in total wealth. Are they really doing work that is worth that much money? Of course not. Many use the holes in the system to get that kind of wealth (which is immoral, but not illegal). Others are handed that income by the board of directors who themselves are C-level executives at other companies who that person is on the board…so no real competition is involved setting high-end compensation packages for them.

    However, they are more than happy to support very minimal raises to their workers because they can get away with it…and an important factor in people getting upset. Sure they can buy stock with their free money, but when the C-level executives are being handed thousands of shares every year, you can understand their bitterness. One high level executive at my company received over $1 million in shares listed as a “gift” in the SEC filings…not even based on performance (for which I’m sure he received his salary, bonuses and additional shares). People would be even more upset if they were to learn that their “competitive” salary is not really based on the free market (at least for large corporation positions), but is actually based on corporate HR talking to other corporate HR (even their competitors)…something that is illegal when setting selling prices (explicit collusion), but not illegal when setting salaries (although certainly immoral).

    Basically, what it comes down to is that this issue is a complex discussion. People are absolutely correct that the top earners in this country are making too much. 1% is the wrong line, and it isn’t just the income that is the problem. Unfortunately, it is a number that has been latched onto, and, although not accurate, the people do have a point in their objections.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Agreed. 1% is the wrong line. Perhaps the Top 0.1%, or 0.5%, but not the top 1%. Top 1% is a dime a dozen.

    [Reply]

  51. January 25th, 2012 at 14:20 | #51

    I would like to be in the top 1%. Or the top 0.1%. Or the top 0.01%

    Wouldn’t we all? Success is not a bad thing.

    [Reply]

  52. Sed8em
    February 3rd, 2012 at 09:22 | #52

    Hi Sam, I have enjoyed the comments related to the great article you put together. I am an evil 1%er. As a neuroanesthesiologist, I went through 17 years of post high school education. Yes that is 17! I am blessed with a loving wife who stuck through it all with me and two healthy children. When I see the protesters I am torn… When in grad school there was a protest walking down the mall. My lab partner and I could see several pretty girls in the crowd so we looked at each other, smiled, and said “Let’s go protest!” We got a picture in the school paper yet knew nothing about what we were protesting! Idiocy of youth.
    Yesterday had lunch with a friend who from scratch built a company with 1000+ employees. He drove his new Ferrari. I asked what the OWS protestors would say about his new car. He replied “They should ask some of my employees families if they felt he should give up, quit, lock the doors, and get rid of the car, and fire them all.”
    I hate being considered the villain, but it is in my nature to work hard. Everyday I wake up thinking of ways to do my work better than I did the day before.
    Maybe I should stop caring about “The People”. I have enough to quit. My friend and I could expatriate, fire our employees, move to Costa Rica, and worry about which wine to have with dinner……But who would be there when the OWS protester gets the emergency call that his mother ruptured her brain aneurysm at two in the morning? Don’t worry, I will be there, but stop vilifying me.

    [Reply]

  53. MB1234
    February 5th, 2012 at 06:31 | #53

    @Shawanda

    I am a 32 year old male filing single, just got my W-2 , made $150,000 roudning to the nearest dollar) in 2011, I’m in the area of finance and capital allocation. I live in a smaller southern city (relative) about 100,000 residents in a 30 mile radius. ABSOLUTLEY, I WOULD GLADLY PAY MORE TAXES; I reliaze I am not in the top 1% , but most likely top 6 % of year over year wage earners. The 5 % left above me are not paying their fair share, BUT it is based on current tax code and they are law-abiding citizens. My theory is simple- WE ALL PITCH IN. If my taxes rise to a 35 % tax bracket or even a new bracket of 32%0 I am all for it! The idea here is not to fight but have a better life for EVERYONE. -A better life for the man on the park bench that cant find work, the elderly grandmother, whomever… I am in the top 6 % and I’m saying RAISE MY TAXES- too many people are hurting and it would be nice if some of the the 10% NOT just the 1% could all pay a few percantage points more to keep public parks open, create more public jobs and not enable others but ensure the tax reveneue ends up where it can improve everyones life.

    See…… the real problem in my opinion ( remember the old saying BTW, “opinions” are like A**holes, everyone’s got one”- so please no bashing. Who can manage the tax revenue in a way that ensures life does improve for the average/ lower 50 % and action is take to bring America back to greatness? The question will come is govt. better or corporate- GOP vs DEMS.- the divide is growing deeper.

    The top, I started FROM NOTHING, no silver spoon and I worked my behind off- but NOT everyone is capable of working the same, or has the same talents that will put them in the top 1% or 6%, etc. bottom line, raise my taxes- bring back the USA we lost…

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    If your belief is, “we all pitch in,” Shouldn’t we start from the bottom 40-57% who aren’t pitching in and paying no federal income taxes? Even just $500 a year from each would help our country greatly.

    [Reply]

  54. Adam
    February 7th, 2012 at 00:03 | #54

    I’m not in the 1% but I don’t care. There have been legitimate scientific studies and surveys that show that only 10% of peoples happiness comes from materialistic items and money. With that being said, happiness comes from the people you surround yourself with. For instance look at Hollywood stars. They have a lot of money, a lot of cars, and nice houses. However… most of them are constantly attending rehabs due to drug abuse, most of them end up wasting all of their money on materialistic items, and in interviews some of them have stated that they “hate” the life they have. So come on everyone, it’s not about how much money you have, what car you drive, or how big your house is. Be happy with the life you have, and if you don’t like it here in the U.S, go to a different country and see how it works out for you. If you truly want to be in the 1% then get up at 5am everyday and work as hard as you can at whatever you do (companies notice hard working people). I’m not even 21 yet and have been offered countless promotions in my current career because I am early everyday, work at 200%, and always have a smile on my face(I happily declined the promotions due to being a full time student). It will not only make you a better, more responsible person, but you will feel accomplished and proud of earning every dollar instead of getting it handed to you.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    I agree with you Adam about money and happiness. However, give it 10 years of working in the corporate world, and let me know if you change your tune.

    thx

    [Reply]

  55. Scott
    March 2nd, 2012 at 10:08 | #55

    First let me say that I am one of the 1%, As many others on this blog have commented, they became part of the 1% by hard work and sacrifice and so did I. It always amazes me that so many people only look at were someone is today and do not take into account what it took to get them there. Personally I wanted the better things in life so I decided to work while my friends were out having fun, when my friends went to spend the weekend at the lake I looked for additional work to do, when my friends came by to show me their new cars that I knew they really couldn’t afford, I just smiled and said nice. I used my own money I had saved during this period to start my own business and really learned what hard work was. I worked from 7 in the morning to 11 at night 7 days a week for over 3 years just trying to get my company up and running. I used to park my crappy car around the corner so my employees did not see what I drove, for the first 5 years in business all of my employees made more money then me. when things started to click and I started actually making some money I kept he crappy car, and the way undersized house so I could invest that money into growing the business. I did this for years while I saw other people driving nice cars, taking nice vacations and going out to have fun on the weekends. I did this by choice so I could provide a better future for myself and my kids (which I missed out on a lot of their childhoods) and that has got me to were I am today, I employ about 300 people who all make a descent living, and I pay millions of dollars in taxes every year ( about 38%). I have done what I have done with no help from the government, none needed, or wanted. So I have to say I know that hard work and sacrifice is what gets you to the 1% so to those who are not willing to do what I have done you have no right to condemn me. Traditional wisdom has always said ,You reap what you sow. So remember if you want to see who is responsible for you particular circumstance then all you have to do is look in the mirror.

    [Reply]

  56. Caroline
    March 10th, 2012 at 20:28 | #56

    To all these nasty comments targeting the 1% I have to say we try hard to make it here. My Parents were raised in lower middle class families and worked hard to be in the 1%. My dad alone makes around 400000 a year but only because he works stressful 14 hour days just to be able to provide for my family. A top 1% person needs to be able to handle the stress. I am sure only the one percent Person has a job this stressful. By no means is my family rich. We struggle like the rest of the country. Living in one of the most expensive towns in America (we live here because this is were the 1% jobs are) sometimes it is hard to make ends meet. It is really unfair to the 1% that we are being stereotyped as mean etc. we employ a lot of the 99% from the businesses we own. No one but my family knows we are in the 1% only because the way we would be treated is awful. We fight for the 99%! My parents have talked about going to one of the protests! It is not all of the 1% that is crazy. Just like in the 99% some people are crazy some aren’t it is like that everywhere And craziness is determined by the viewer. If people new I was in the 1% I would be viewed as a horrible person, but because People don’t know this I’m not viewed that way.

    [Reply]

    top 5% Reply:

    400,000 a year is the bottom earning of the 1%. what the government should tax the most should be those who make >1M a year. The tax rate should continue to rise up to 95% for those who makes > 20M a year. After the tax, they still have at least 1M net into their pocket. this is far more than enough to live a decent life even in the most expensive place. also why should someone in a family of ~5 live in a mansion enough for 100 people. didn’t we get rid of kings/queens so that the world belongs to everyone, and yet we still strive for living like a king/queen? (many countries still keep their kings/queens as a symbol of corruption) certain things in life should not be capped, such as knowledge and research and education. but certain things should be capped, such as how much one should make and spend on useless things.

    [Reply]

  57. Niki (NG)
    April 9th, 2012 at 11:42 | #57

    I came to the beatiful and wonderful USA forty years ago. No money, no English or parents. Worked 10 to 12 hours a day six days a week pumping gas and fixing flat tires. At night, I went to shcool. I wanted to be someone one day. I did not know the difference between 1% vs. 99% income earners. My goals were to finish school, get a better job, make more money, have a car and of course, a home with a family. I have been very fortunate to meet all my goals. Currently, I own a company that provides income and benefits for other 20 families. With the exception of couple of employees most of them are in the 99% income earners. However, they are so thankful to have jobs and benefits that they do not complaint. They work hard and come to work everyday. One day they want to be in the 1% income earners. For many years I was a 99% income earner. My first weekly pay check was $62.00 or approx. $2,976 per year. No benefits at all. The American dream is very much alive. I am an example of the American dream. I am proud to be an Amercian living in the USA and be one of the 1% income earner.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Niki, thanks for sharing your story! Love it! It’s good you’ve never forgotten where you’ve come from, and that you appreciate the position you are in now.

    [Reply]

  58. Cal
    April 20th, 2012 at 17:34 | #58

    There is more to the story, as there usually is. Owning several business’ some of which make money and a couple that do not and require capital infusions can cause a 1%er to have a lower than elite lifestyle. I pay taxes on more that 500k but have to prop up a business that is suffering due to the policies of this crappy administration thus struggle with this economy.
    O-bama
    M-ust
    G-o

    [Reply]

  59. May 18th, 2012 at 06:46 | #59

    We all agree on 3 things. 1-The governments (federal, state and local) waste money. 2-We all want to pay less tax. 3-Everyone pays tax for some things they don’t support (certain wars, different types of health coverage, etc.), but that’s America.
    What’s FAIR? From a strictly arithmetic perspective, if you have 90% of the wealth, why aren’t you paying 90% of the tax. Some multi-billion dollar corporations pay NO TAX, many 1%-ers pay NO TAX. They don’t NEED the money. Contrary to the popular sound bites, there is NO EVIDENCE that corporate tax breaks create jobs, and many corporation created jobs are outside the US. The middle and lower income people are much more effected by the tax structure than the 1%. The 99% NEED their money to survive. The 1% need their money to make more money.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    The top 1% make 20% of all income, but pay almost DOUBLE of all taxes at 38%.

    http://www.financialsamurai.com/2011/04/12/how-much-money-do-the-top-income-earners-make-percent/

    [Reply]

    top 5% Reply:

    you are right on the money.

    [Reply]

  60. May 24th, 2012 at 14:50 | #60

    Sick of all these clueless comments.

    You guys are all complaining about a group of people that you have “straw-manned”; they don’t exist! You’re complaining about people who protest against the top 1% in a very literal manner; people who hate people that work hard to earn their top 1% salary. There is, to my knowledge, no official group that ever furthered such ideals. In essence you guys are all grossly ignorant of the whole point of the Occupy movement, which is to protest bigger issues about government/economics and the nature of Wall Street banking/investing. I don’t know the details of it as I am not one of THEM either, but I can tell you 1% supporters that you are definitely straw-manning the protestors.

    [Reply]

    Max Loh Reply:

    Not to mention, it is absolutely ludicrous to take the 99% and 1% literally. In that case if someone earns $375k per year they are a hard working 99% and all of a sudden they get a raise and make $380k per year they are suddenly evil due to an arbitrary boolean boundary? Get a grip; people aren’t that illogical.

    [Reply]

  61. top 5%
    May 25th, 2012 at 01:23 | #61

    this article is exactly the kind coming out of someone who has little to no clue what the world is run. he/she has no understanding of how the mind works. our society is largely misled by the blind who think they know how to live a life. check out Jacque Fresco’s idea. that is what i consider a truly advanced human mind. as long as there is mighty military force, police force, lawyers, gangsters and politicians (the only difference between politicians and gangsters is that politicians normally dont kill their enemies with guns, but with mouths and pens) we see today, we are no better than chimpazees, the only difference is that we can make things like computers, etc.

    [Reply]

  62. top 5%
    May 25th, 2012 at 08:04 | #62

    first of all, let us think why those 1% make so much money and where does the money comes from. usually these are the people who own a business, making products or selling products. some are the presidents or chacellors of the universities. true certainly they work hard, but one should ask whether that hard work or money they make turn into the following:
    1. people are healthier
    2. people are happier
    3. people are more educated
    4. the society becomes crimeless
    5. the world becomes more peaceful and no need of defense and offense
    etc.
    if none of these are being reached, what is the point of making so much money?

    [Reply]

  63. Charles Kiyimba
    July 2nd, 2012 at 04:42 | #63

    We all have the potential to become wealthy if we visualize what we want in life, focus on achieving it. Nobody is born to live a life of mediocrity. But what makes people to live ordinary life is their mind. If you focus your mind on getting what you want to achieve and work on it every day, you can achieve. Thanks a lot for this wonderful and motivating article.

    [Reply]

  64. July 19th, 2012 at 23:01 | #64

    The upper class is most commonly defined as the top 1% with household incomes commonly exceeding $250,000 annually.

    [Reply]

  65. Nickolas M. Connery
    July 23rd, 2012 at 22:28 | #65

    What I found interesting is how LITTLE money you actually have to earn in a year to be counted among the “top 1%” of earners. According to this article, my boss is it the top 1%, and she’s just a Paralegal Manager. I’m a mid-level Paralegal, and yet I count among the top 25%!!

    It isn’t the top 1% of earners, or even the top 0.1% of earners (those who make a few million or so) whose absurd wealth is worthy of condemnation, but the top 0.0001%, those who bring in hundreds of millions, or billions of dollars, and who routinely corrupt our system and can bend the rules that the rest of us must live by. These are the people whose influence in our society should somehow be curtailed.

    To focus popular anger on the top 1% only serves to turn lower-level workers against middle managers who probably work as hard as they do, while ignoring the “royalty” at the very top who are really pulling all the strings.

    [Reply]

  66. lance
    August 6th, 2012 at 21:32 | #66

    @Shawanda
    money money money….stop chasing the green printed paper, its not real. take advantage of what little time you have here and experience as much as possible….life is so short

    [Reply]

  67. Al Dorman
    August 10th, 2012 at 08:32 | #67

    FYI to all the mouth-breathers:
    Occupy’s term 1% doesn’t refer to YOU! It’s a rhetorical slogan that refers to those who are BUYING our politicians, making them prostitutes for the most elite and unaccountable corporations, ensuring continual crises and war-spending. Get a clue.

    [Reply]

  68. August 18th, 2012 at 11:11 | #68

    Excellent posting.

    [Reply]

  69. Bill Chase
    September 9th, 2012 at 13:51 | #69

    Somehow you determined or researched the salary number $380,000 and above as the 1% group, and you said these people are all around us–everywhere. I think not. By definition, every one person in a hundred is in this group, so if a thousand people are with me in stadium section B, then ten people are in this high salary group. They must be grouped together because none are around me.

    Would you please give me your reference source so I may know how many average Joes are around me and so I may know what is salary range of average Joes. My perception (in a non-union region) is 80% are making up to $100,000 and about half of them are below $50,000. I would like to have perception changed into reality.

    [Reply]

  70. coedk
    September 13th, 2012 at 17:27 | #70

    Look, I have to laugh at all of the people on this forum who loath the one percenters. It isn’t as if we don’t know how the market works! It isn’t as if education, regardless of field, will always pau off. I.e. who would pay.one hundred grand a year for someone with no credentials other than a masters degree in Art history from a state college? When they could get a decent computer programmer for 80,000 a year or two accountants for 100,000? I find no quirks with being an employee (good stability, if your half decent in a desired field) and don’t get me wrong everyone can excell in some desired field, the trouble is identifying it before its too late! For example, if you like talking to people become a psychologist, if you enjoy science become a doctor,surgron, or engineer. If you like math, become an actuarian. If you like Englis, history and polotics become a lawyer, etc. even if your passion is something COMPLETELY useless~ become a proffessor! But make NO mistake! All fields require working harder than you can imsgine, competing with a dozen other people, and skill and experiences beyond the other candidates. The thing is though, that in order to stay ncially stable you will always have to live within a budget regardless of how much or how little it is. To get rich is a completely different, and risky, story though. There are many ways to get wealthy~ but ALL require hard work and a different type of thinking than the rest of society. Firstly, invest wisely. There are people who are now millionares because they bought stock in apple when it was down.I, even, know people who became millionares without a highschool education! They did NOT get rich with working as an employee though! Start a company, ride the recession back up by investing in realestate (im talking appartment complexes in the middle of cities, hotels in attractive areas, or bars in areas that will lilely start devoloping onve it recovers. One thing is for sure though, the routes of getting rich are also the ways to loosing everything~ if it were easy than everyone would do it.Oh, and another thing! Get your finger out of your @$$ and stop feeling entitled!!!!

    [Reply]

  71. Sweat equity
    September 27th, 2012 at 20:38 | #71

    Why hate on the 1% not only do they pay a huge amount in taxes they also hire people and pay payroll taxes on all of their employees. So when it comes to business owners don’t just look the the % they pay on their personal income. Look at personal income plus business taxes, taxes associated with employees, equipment taxes and the list goes on. If the IRS raises taxes on this group of people aka small business what you will see is investment in people and equipment drop sharply. As a small business owner I am the last person to receive payment from the company, we are very successful but there are still times that we go months without a paycheck due to payroll, payroll taxes, social security, unemployment tax, material from our vendors, utilities, fuel, capital equipment and after all that is paid then our bill from the IRS arrives. As a business sometimes the profit you make takes six months for it to be realized after everything. It is disturbing to see people hate on people that take on so much risk and others feel that they should pay more than they already do in taxes.

    “The government is not the solution, the government is the problem”

    - Ronald Reagan

    I don’t believe our country has a revenue problem I believe we have a spending problem.

    [Reply]

  72. joe joe
    October 12th, 2012 at 15:50 | #72

    The $380,00 is adjusted gross income. FYI- It makes a big difference

    [Reply]

  73. John C.
    November 8th, 2012 at 10:25 | #73

    I am a 25 yo making 19k/month, and I’ll tell you this, it ain’t easy :)

    Most people value security. To make 30k/mth, you can’t get there working a day job.

    Most people value relationships. To make 30k/mth, being a good boyfriend, or even having a consistent relationship isnt easy.

    Society isnt setup for people to make 30k/month. Maybe 2k, 4k, or even 8-10k per month is possible if you follow the rules and work hard. You have to LIBERATE YOURSELF FROM THE RULES to take things to the next step. Perez Hilton didnt start a blog because somebody said this is what you do. He went off on his own. It takes balls to give up your security blanket. It takes confidence. Stop for a moment and think how awesome our country is, we’re a bunch of rule-breakers.

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Nice work! What is your line of business?

    [Reply]

  74. March 10th, 2013 at 10:28 | #74

    You use $380K as the threshhold for top 1% income. I would note that household income ranking tool on the Wall Street Journal blog marks $380K as top 2%. According to the blog,

    “An annual salary above $506,000 puts you in the top 1%”

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    There is a difference between household and individual.

    [Reply]

  75. Brian
    March 11th, 2013 at 14:19 | #75

    This is 100% right wing propaganda not based in facts.
    Try this instead:
    http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

    [Reply]

    Financial Samurai Reply:

    Brian,

    What about Socialism As A Means To A Brighter Future?

    This article abou the top 1% income earners isn’t right wing propaganda. It’s the truth that there are so many high income jobs out there, from police officers to bankers to dockworkers. If you want to make more, you can. If you don’t want to, don’t complain why you aren’t.

    Sam

    [Reply]

  1. October 28th, 2011 at 02:42 | #1
  2. February 19th, 2013 at 07:30 | #2

PRIVACY: We will never disclose or sell your e-mail address or any of your data from this site. We do highly welcome posts and community interaction, and registering is simply part of the posting system.

DISCLAIMER: Financial Samurai exists to thought provoke and learn from the community. Your decisions are yours alone and we are in no way responsible for your actions. Stay on the righteous path and think long and hard before making any financial transaction! Disclosures