If we want to boost government revenue, then renters should pay more taxes. With more renters paying more taxes, we can better fight for equality and help all people.
Every winter and spring, millions of homeowners across America pay their property taxes. In California, homeowners have to fork over roughly 1.24% of the assessed value every year to the local government. Put it another way, in 83 years, a homeowner will have paid 100% the value of his or her home in taxes! How sick is that?
It is the American way for all citizens to pay their taxes, except for the many who don’t. We know by now that the often cited “47%” are the elderly or those who make under $20,000 so that’s fine. If you are one of them, just don’t vote to raise taxes on the 53% who already pay 100% of all federal income taxes please! Let’s all pitch in or starve the beast instead.
So why is it that homeowners, many of whom initially struggle to pay their mortgages and come up with the down payment, have to pay extra taxes while renters don’t? Let’s explore and discuss, shall we?
Why Renters Should Pay More Taxes: We Are All Equal
So why is it that renters don’t have to pay a renters tax while homeowners have to pay property tax?
The clearest reason is because the government perceives homeowners as Lords! The word “landlord” makes it very clear that homeowners are considered the superior class.
Back in the old days, peasants had to toil in the fields to pay for shelter. They couldn’t even afford regular food, let alone pay extra in taxes to help build schools and maintain roads. Then there’s the term “master bedroom.” You get the idea.
Hundreds of years later, it’s odd that this archaic term and concept still holds true, even though America has grown to become the wealthiest nation in the world.
For anybody to equate renter to poverty is just ludicrous. Sure, there are some studies that show that the average net worth for a homeowner is 40X greater than that of a renter ($160,000 vs. $4,000). But overall, many more Americans nowadays rent out of choice, not out of insufficient funds.
Everybody Needs To Pay More Tax
With a typical $700,000 home in San Francisco, the homeowner is paying around $8,000 a year to the city to fund schools and maintain public infrastructure projects. That’s $8,000 more than a renter pays, yet both the homeowner and the renter enjoy the same benefits. Clearly, this is unfair.
Just looking at my bill, I see $50 going to the SFUSD (I have no idea what the hell this is), and another $205 going to “teacher’s support”, even though I don’t have kids in public school. Supposedly, a couple thousand of my property tax is going to be used to build a bullet train from San Francisco to LA too. Sweet! I’m really going to be riding that in 2020 when it’s done? No, because it’s now 2020, 10 years after I initially wrote this post and the project has been scrapped! But of course, not before wasting at last a billion dollars of tax-payer’s money.
Some renters argue that homeowners got it good already with the mortgage interest deduction of $750,000 (was $1,000,000). In other words, if my interest rate is 5%, I can reduce my taxable income by $37,500. Well I say $750,000 is not enough!
The figure is totally arbitrary, and should be raised by at least double to $1,500,000. It takes a lot of work to be able to save up 20% for a downpayment on a house and have 10% left over as a buffer in my 30/30/3 rule. Homeowners therefore deserve a reward for their fiscal discipline, rather than be punished with more taxation.
Equality Between Renters And Homeowners
I’m a big believer in equality, and therefore I believe renters should pay a “Renter Tax.” To calculate an equitable way to tax renters, what we do is capitalize the annual rent by a normal risk free rate of say 4%.
Say for example you pay $24,000 a year in rent. Divide $24,000 by 4% and you get $600,000. The $600,000 is the basis where you as a renter will pay 1.2% ($7,200) every year to the city, to also pitch in and support the schools and roads.
The Renter Tax proposition is a brilliant way to shore up any budget deficit the city or state may have, while creating a fair scenario for all people. Let’s create an environment where everybody proudly pitches in to ensure a harmoniously great nation for all our children!
And most of all, let’s change the perception that renters are lower class citizens and tax renters just as much as homeowners. Renters should pay more taxes for better equality for all!
If you are a renter, are you sufficiently frustrated yet? The goal of this post is to recreate the frustration homeowners and certain income groups feel for having to pay more taxes.
It’s understandable to vote on legislation to spend more of other people’s money for your own benefit. However, in the long run, you just end up hurting yourself because rents will increase to reflect increased expenditure by way of property taxes.
If you want more spending, please also agree to pay more taxes as well. It is wrong to raise taxes on one group of people without having to pay more yourself.
Refinance your mortgage. Check out Credible, my favorite mortgage marketplace where prequalified lenders compete for your business. You can get competitive, real quotes in under three minutes for free. Mortgage rates are down to all-time lows! When banks compete, you win.
Explore real estate crowdfunding. If you’re looking to buy property as an investment or reinvest your house sale proceeds, take a look at Fundrise, one of the largest real estate crowdfunding platforms today. They allow everyone to invest in mid-market commercial real estate deals across the country that were once only available to institutions or super high net worth individuals.
Fundrise is the pioneers of eREIT funds. Thanks to technology, it’s now much easier to take advantage of lower valuation, higher net rental yield properties across America.
Note: In the UK, it is the occupant of the building who pays the property tax, regardless if they are a renter or a homeowner. It’s called the Council Tax, and it’s working just fine over there.