The Income Limit To Qualify For College Scholarships And Grants

If you’re a personal finance enthusiast with kids, you’ve probably wondered: at what household income level will colleges stop offering scholarships and grants (i.e., free money) to help your child attend? What is that income cutoff?

Given that the cost of college is already outrageous — and likely only getting worse — this is a valid and important question. The biggest joke of all? At this rate, you’ll need to be a millionaire just to afford four years at a private university, with the total cost approaching $1 million!

Thanks to an analysis by Bloomberg in an article titled Top Colleges Are Too Costly Even for Parents Making $300,000, we now have a rough answer. The research, conducted by Ann Choi, Francesca Maglione, Paulina Cachero, and Raeedah Wahid, highlights how America’s “middle class” is increasingly being squeezed out of elite college affordability, with little recourse but to opt out.

As a parent of two, neither of whom I believe have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting into a top-50 university, I’ve already mentally prepared for the more practical route: public university or community college for the first two years. However, Bloomberg’s article points out that even public universities might not necessarily be much cheaper, depending on your household income.

Let’s explore this critical and fascinating topic.

Household Income Limit for Receiving Free Money from Colleges

According to Bloomberg’s analysis, once a household’s income reaches $400,000, families should no longer expect to receive any scholarships or grants. In other words, households earning $400,000 or more are generally expected to pay the full sticker price. Roughly 50% of families at these elite private universities are already doing so.

The Income Level Where College Scholarships And Grants Stop

I think it’s great that private colleges are trying to make higher education more affordable for more families. Getting to pay half price if your household makes around $225,000 a year isn’t a bad deal. After all, $225,000 provides a comfortable middle-class lifestyle for a family of four living in a non-coastal city.

Unfortunately, colleges don't seem to take into account the cost-of-living differences households face across the country. Earning $225,000 in San Francisco or New York City provides a significantly lower quality of life than earning the same amount in Des Moines. If colleges could take that next step and factor in a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), that would be lovely.

From the article:

At USC, families that make around $180,000 are expected to pay anywhere from 22% to 33% of their income towards tuition, or roughly $50,000 on average — the largest financial burden out of the schools in Bloomberg’s analysis, each of which uses the MyinTuition calculator.

A family with the same financial profile is expected to contribute 13%, or $24,000, towards the annual tuition at MIT.

At Williams College, a student with $300,000 of family income would be asked to pay from $43,000 to $73,000 a year toward the roughly $92,000 sticker price. The same student qualifies for little to no relief at Harvard, where tuition is around $87,000 a year, according to the analysis.

Thanks to the Bloomberg article, hopefully it’s now clear to everyone that earning $300,000 a year is considered a middle-class income in many parts of the country. I was raked over the coals in the comments section of my article, despite having a clear and realistic household budget. But folks are finally coming around!

It’s Not as Simple as Earning Less Than $400,000 to Get Free Money for College

At first glance, staying under $400,000 in household income sounds easy. After all, $400,000 puts you in the top 3% of income earners in America, meaning about 97% of households earn less. Yay — most of us should get free money for college, right? Wrong.

What the Bloomberg article overlooks is the impact of assets. In the personal finance world, net worth matters more than active income. One day you could be earning a high salary, and the next you could be out of a job. However, once you build a large enough net worth, you can generate enough passive investment income to live freely forever.

Perhaps Bloomberg’s narrow focus on income alone reflects broader societal trends. After all, the average savings rate in America hovers around just 5%. Our society prioritizes aggressive consumerism over disciplined saving and investing. According to the latest Survey of Consumer Finances, the median net worth in America is only about $192,000.

Bloomberg may be assuming that the typical American family doesn’t build a rental property portfolio, doesn’t open a custodial investment account (UTMA), and doesn’t save in a 529 college savings plan — and they might be right!

Case in point: I recently spoke to a friend who manages money professionally and has an MBA from Harvard. He has two kids, ages 5 and 8 and he had no idea what a 529 plan even was!

Your Assets Matter When Applying For Financial Aid For College

When filling out the FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid), the assets that count against a family (i.e., are considered available to help pay for college and can reduce financial aid eligibility) generally include:

Assets that FAFSA Counts:

  • Cash, savings, and checking account balances
  • Investments, including:
    • Stocks
    • Bonds
    • Mutual funds
    • Certificates of deposit (CDs)
    • Cryptocurrency
  • Real estate (but not the family's primary home — see more below)
  • College savings accounts, like 529 plans (if owned by the parent or student)
  • Trust funds
  • UGMA/UTMA accounts (student-owned accounts)
  • Businesses and farms (only if they have 100+ full-time employees or are investment businesses)

Assets that FAFSA Does Not Count:

  • Primary residence (family home equity is excluded so buy the nicest house you can afford)
  • Retirement accounts, such as:
    • 401(k)s
    • IRAs (traditional and Roth)
    • Pensions
    • Annuities
  • Life insurance policies
  • Personal possessions (like cars, furniture, jewelry)

Additional Notes:

  • Parent assets are assessed at a much lower rate than student assets.
    • About 5.64% of parent assets are considered available for college costs.
    • About 20% of student assets are counted, which is much harsher.
  • 529 plans owned by parents are treated as a parent asset (better).
    • 529s owned by grandparents (under the old FAFSA rules) could mess things up when distributions happen, but starting with the 2024-2025 FAFSA, those distributions are no longer reported as untaxed student income.

The More Assets You Have, the Less Free Money You Get for College

If your household of four earns $80,000 a year but has a $5 million taxable brokerage account, $200,000 in cash, a $2 million rental property portfolio, and $300,000 in each child's 529 plan, you're unlikely to get any free money for college.

Don’t even bother trying to manipulate your income lower. Give up! Your years of diligent saving and investing have earned you the “privilege” of paying full sticker price. You can't hide your assets to make yourself look poorer — and if a school finds out you tried, your child’s admission offer could get rescinded.

The most amount of money you and your children can outside of tax-advantage retirement accounts is about $300,000 per child to receive college scholarships. So if you’ve been thinking about buying that midlife crisis car or a big expensive home you don’t need, doing so may help win you free money. Remember, you can own a $10 million mansion and drive a Lamborghini and FASFA won’t count the assets in their calculations.

Unfortunately, all elite private universities go beyond the FAFSA and require the CSS Profile to evaluate whether your household qualifies for need-based financial aid. The CSS Profile is much more thorough because it distributes money from the colleges' own funds, not from the federal government. With the CSS profile, your mansion probably counts against you.

If you are income poor and asset rich, you lose when it comes to getting free financial aid for college.

What About Going to Public College to Save Money?

As a graduate of The College of William & Mary, a public school in Virginia, I’ve long been a strong advocate for attending public college to save money. When I went, my parents paid just $2,800 a year in tuition, while private universities were charging around $20,000.

However, attending a public college to save money over a private one may not be as straightforward today. According to Bloomberg’s analysis, once your household income exceeds roughly $170,000, it could actually be cheaper to send your child to a private university.

The reason? Private colleges often have more resources and are more willing to offer financial aid, while public colleges expect families to contribute more once they cross certain income thresholds.

Public versus private university household income cutoff where going private is better

Personally, I think what will likely happen for my kids is that they’ll either attend a public college or go to a tier 2 or 3 private college with “merit aid.” I put “merit aid” in quotes because many colleges are now giving out money under the guise of merit to make families feel good and incentivize enrollment.

Don’t Be Middle Class When Applying for College Grants and Scholarships

Hopefully, it’s clear from this analysis that when applying for college, you either want to be poor or a multi-millionaire.

If you’re poor, you’ll likely get significant free money for college, which is fantastic. Please take full advantage. A college education is still one of the best ways to break out of the poverty cycle.

If you’re a multi-millionaire, you probably won’t qualify for need-based grants or scholarships. But the sting of paying full price won’t feel as painful because you’ll have enough assets saved up, and possibly a high income as well. If you’re lucky, your child might even receive need-blind merit aid, which is essentially a discount to encourage them to enroll.

Unfortunately, if you’re a millionaire with a net worth under ~$5 million, paying $100,000+ per year for four years for just one child will still hurt. Ideally, you’d want a net worth of at least 25X for the cost to no longer feel painful.

In other words, if you want to send your kid to NYU or USC for $400,000 total, you’d need at least a $10 million net worth to feel financially comfortable doing so. How crazy is that? Pretty soon, going to a private college will only be a luxury for the very rich or the extremely talented.

The middle-class household earning between $150,000 to $400,000 a year will feel the most pain when paying for college. Unless you’re a legacy student, athlete, or part of a special interest group, affording college comfortably will likely be tough. And you can't count those advantages as they aren't in your control.

Readers, what are your plans to make college more affordable? Why do you think Bloomberg and others not take into consideration assets when doing their analysis? Are we really just a nation of spenders who don't save and invest aggressively for the future?

Become a Millionaire to Afford a Million-Dollar College Degree

It’s ironic that households now need to become millionaires because the total cost of college is heading toward a million dollars all-in. But the math doesn't lie. You can either take matters into your own hands by building serious wealth, or pray for the kindness of others in this brutally competitive world. I choose the former.

If you want to have an easier time paying for college, pick up a copy of my new book, Millionaire Milestones: Simple Steps to Seven Figures. It would be a crying shame for your child to get into their dream school but not be able to attend because you weren't wealthy enough. The more money you have, the more options — and freedom — you and your children will have.

Millionaire Milestones book by Sam Dogen, Financial Samurai bestseller
Click to pick up a copy on Amazon today

If you love personal finance, join 60,000+ others and sign up for my free weekly newsletter. Since 2009, my goal is to help readers achieve financial freedom sooner so we can do more of what we want.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Midwest Doc
Midwest Doc
14 days ago

You don’t have to report assets on FAFSA if you receive subsidies for Healthcare on the government marketplace.

You could accumulate millions in assets, then retire. You keep AGI income under $130k or so. You receive subsidies and automatically skip the asset question on FAFSA.

PHS
PHS
17 days ago

Your observation about assets is spot on. Assets matter a lot in the financial aid calculations, but the general advice about financial aid focuses way more on income. Our daughter graduated from an expensive elite college seven years ago, so we faced lower tuition numbers than 2025, but the overall pattern was the same. Our income was not high (well within the range where the school expected to offer aid) but we’d accumulated assets due to early saving and consistent investment in index funds. We’d also paid off our mortgage. As a result of those assets and lack of debt, we received ZERO financial aid. Now, I am very happy that we saved and pleased to have covered my daughter’s education, but disappointed that the perspective of the financial aid departments is geared to reward the spenders over the savers and investors. It seems like a flawed set of incentives and assumptions.

Midwest Doc
Midwest Doc
18 days ago

From personal experience. You can get an excellent education at a state school costing $20k to $30k a year. You don’t need to go to an elite school costing $100k a year. I hire people for my practice and grads from elite schools can be really awful.

LKP
LKP
22 days ago

Another thing that can blindside parents is the cost of housing, meal plans, and books. Most scholarships, grants, and merit aid will not cover these costs as the IRS considers that taxable income if it is used for anything other than tuition. This is where a 529 is really beneficial!

If a student gets a “full ride” from an institution, this will likely only cover tuition costs, not housing, meal plans, and books. Some institutions require freshman to live on campus and purchase certain meal plans, so these costs cannot be avoided. And, these costs can get up to 10-15k per year, in addition to tuition.

Most public universities do not have scholarship money to give out because tuition is already “subsidized” by tax dollars. Outside scholarships and grants often provide the lion’s share of opportunities for students looking for ways to help pay for the cost of attending public universities.

Also, if the student has outside scholarships or grants, the institution may actually lower its own scholarship offer if the addition of those outside scholarships and grants exceeds the total tuition cost (see above regarding IRS). Some universities won’t let you “stack” their institutional aid and outside scholarships/grants. The best advice is to really research each university your kid is interested in and ask specific questions about how they handle these types of situations.

Here’s another thing most people do not realize: some public universities have such large enrollment numbers, they can no longer provide enough on-campus housing for their students, so you are forced to seek housing off-campus, which in a HCOL city can be just as much as the cost of tuition if not more. You can’t get financial aid, student loans, or scholarships/grants to pay for off-campus housing. The University of Texas at Austin is a perfect example of this scenario. While College Station, Texas, is not considered a HCOL city, Texas A&M can no longer house all of its freshman on-campus either. Off-campus housing costs can really add up, even if you have roommates.

Many private universities give generous merit aid based on GPA and testing scores, not financial need, so that the cost of tuition is roughly equivalent to the state university tuition in the hopes of attracting more students. When you add in the cost of off-campus housing for a public university that doesn’t offer merit aid and can’t guarantee housing, you might actually make out better financially by attending a private university rather than a public one.

The moral of the story is do your homework, ask lots of questions, and don’t assume that public universities will be cheaper than private ones.

LKP
LKP
21 days ago

Kid #1 is finishing freshman year at what is considered a Tier 2 private university. In addition to it just being the right fit for several academic and emotional reasons, this university requires that freshmen AND sophomores live on campus, so we are guaranteed on-campus housing for at least two years. We like this two-year requirement – some don’t – and it was a big factor for us when we compared various schools. The on-campus housing cost for this school is less than what we would pay for off-campus, especially when you add in a share of utilities, transportation, etc. Plus, we don’t have to worry about where Kid #1 is going to live for at least two years.

Because this campus is in a growing metropolitan area with rising housing costs, and its enrollment is projected to increase in each of the coming years, the university is currently constructing more apartment-style dorms for upper-classmen, so there is a possibility that Kid #1 could continue to live on-campus for additional years, if she wanted.

Housing around college campuses is just crazy, and the development/investment opportunities around them could be an entire post in itself! People at this school are signing leases at the end of their freshman year for housing they won’t move into until their junior year!

We started a 529 with Vanguard for Kid #1 when she was about 3 (a little late, looking back) and grandparents made nice contributions on birthdays and Christmas. We personally contributed when we could, but not on a regular, automated schedule. We were too busy building wealth for ourselves, contributing to our own retirement funds, and being a little naïve about just how much college costs have increased since we went.

We kept the funds with Vanguard but switched from a target date fund to a “customized” combination of funds around age 10. Probably should have done that earlier in hindsight. In January of senior year in high school, we kept the funds in the Vanguard but switched them to a money market option to avoid any major market swings. By that time, we had built up enough to fund 1-1/2 years of tuition, housing, meal plans, and books at the Tier 2 private she chose.

Kid #1 got a nice merit scholarship that requires that she maintain a certain GPA, which helps keep her accountable for academics. A portion of the scholarship is distributed each semester by the school to cover tuition costs, but the total amount awarded over the 4 years will essentially cover what would be an entire year of tuition, housing, meal plan, and books. We will just cash flow the remaining costs through a combination of savings and investments.

We are owners of a small business. Kid #1 started working for us at 15 and continues to work when home for holidays/summer. This kid is pretty low-maintenance and a saver, so she uses her own money for “fun” and day-to-day expenses. We helped her start a Roth IRA, and we “gift” her money each year, no more than what she made on W-2, so she can “contribute” that amount back to the Roth and keep her earnings. Once she turned 18, she enrolled in our company 401k plan and automatically contributes the same percentage as the company match each paycheck.

Our goal is for Kid #1 to graduate in 4 years with no debt, which we feel confident we can achieve through a combination of 529, merit scholarship, and cashflow.

Kid #2 is a middle-schooler, so we have more time and have learned some lessons from Kid #1. We started a 529 earlier, were more aggressive with choice of funds, and have set up automatic, monthly contributions to the 529. Kid #2 has already accumulated more than Kid #1 had in a 529, so we’re at a crossroads. It is tempting to increase the amount of our monthly 529 contribution to Kid #2’s fund so that we could rest easy knowing that we have enough to cover 4 years of tuition, housing, meal plans, and books at the same Tier 2 private. BUT, what if that school is not a good fit for this kid? What if merit is received? What if Kid #2 chooses a school that costs less than what we’ve got in the 529? We could end up with a situation where Kid #2 gets “more” than Kid #1 did.   

Jarrod S.
Jarrod S.
22 days ago

This is great analysis and confirms the pain I feel. With an income in that $400k range and non-retirement accounts in the range of $1.5M, I feel the pinch. Bad. This will take a while as a fix because of the ongoing impression that college is the key to financial security, but I think the fix has to be that (1) financial aid has to be limited. In other words, as long as there are enough funds to pay, colleges will continue to charge what they do and keep raising their tuition. This may mean that poorer kids don’t go to college or they go to lesser colleges that cost less. But that’s life. Those with money have more options. (2) Related to (1), society needs to decrease demand such that colleges have to lower their pricing to sell attendance. Let the market work in other words. Of course, the “elite” (as distinguished from better, in part, because smarter attendees will always make the college look smarter and better) will always be in demand, but decreasing demand overall should, in theory, force colleges to lower the costs (and maybe, just maybe, cut some of the bloat they’ve built up over decades of plenty). To that end, it makes little sense for *likely most* of college attendees to actually go to college. 30 years ago I read a piece in Fortune (I think) that essentially said that if you exclude doctors, lawyers, and engineers, the average college graduate would make about $1,000 per year over their lifetime more than those with high school diplomas only. The article also added that this amount was so low that there could be other explanations for the additional money, such as the people simply being smarter or having certain habits that would have made them this difference regardless of whether they went to college. I would like to see some updated analysis on this. Maybe you can write a piece on this. Because if that is true, then college, at it’s current cost, cannot be made up over one’s lifetime. In other words, college, generally, would actually be the best way to ensure the graduate is poorer than they would have been had they not gone to college. There is an axiom that people believe in that going to college is the best way to get out of poverty. You cite it in your piece. But is that actually true anymore, especially with what colleges charge now, or is entering a trade, for example, or (God forbid) getting a good manufacturing job, the best way? I’d like to see a piece on this from you. Thanks!

RalphF
RalphF
22 days ago

We’re going through this process now with our junior. Most of this post is in regards to need based grants and scholarships. If your kid is brilliant (1550+ SAT, etc.) one can quite easily get tuition grants, it just may not be at your favorite brand name. In short, there are plenty of expensive schools looking to attract the smarter kids to their campuses. It’s up to you what you want to pay for, but the big brands don’t come cheap/free (nor should they, imho).

Teo
Teo
22 days ago

Funny that after I just finished reading this article on USAToday
usatoday.com/story/news/education/2025/04/28/republicans-propose-student-loan-changes/83329029007/# I found your newsletter about scholarships. So the chances for low income students to go to college will disappear.

RalphF
RalphF
22 days ago

That’s going to change. I live in one of those big name private university towns (not Palo Alto). The attack on the endowment combined with the measures Teo is mentioning is a severe risk to low income participants. Don’t assume the past is the future.

WSinTX
WSinTX
22 days ago

Step parent income matters too. So you could potentially be putting 4 breadwinners and two sets of household assets on that form.

Jamie
Jamie
22 days ago

Thanks for highlighting those charts and Bloomberg’s huge blind spot on net worth. The financial aid applications I’ve seen want to see your tax returns to help verify income and they ask all sorts of questions about assets you hold/own. So it would take flat out lying in writing to try and fudge the system. Not a good idea to risk getting caught if it would revoke the child’s admission. It’s very frustrating how hard it is to get accepted into schools today let alone be able to afford going to them! I don’t expect the outrageous costs to decline in the next 10-20 years but I still am hoping they will.