Obama considers single people making over $200,000 to be rich. He specifically called for raising taxes on singles making over $200,000 and couples making $250,000 every year he’s been office.
At the end of 2012, there was a compromise in Congress for raising income taxes for those making $400,000/$450,000 and above. Why $400,000 + $400,000 doesn’t equal $800,000 for a married couple to pay more taxes, I’m not sure. The government still harkens back to its old days of believing one spouse should stay at home.
With the new tax plan for 2018, the Trump administration now views individuals making $500,000 and married couples making $600,000 as rich, because those are the income thresholds that now pay the top federal marginal income tax rate of 37%. Further, the estate tax threshold doubles to $11 million per individual and $22 million per couple.
There are two aspects of monetary wealth we can focus on: Income and Capital. Some make a lot of income, but have only a little amount of capital since they are either starting off in their careers, or haven’t saved and invested an appropriate amount. That’s not going to happen to you because you read Financial Samurai and will follow my savings guide to ensure capital accumulation.
Meanwhile, there are those with a tremendous amount of Capital, with little income given they may have inherited their wealth but have no income generating skills. Capital heavy people may have invested skillfully over the years, built great companies, or were incredibly disciplined in their savings. There are many different types of folks in the Capital heavy category. It’s not a bad place to be at all.
Ideally, it’s best to have both high income and a large capital base. This is my goal, and therefore my goal for all of you as well. In this post, we’ll focus on the income side of the equation and what to strive for just in case we don’t have a trust fund from mom and dad.
How Much Income Do You Need To Be Considered Rich?
Instead of just saying what I think, I’m going to share my thoughts on various income levels per person for populations living in coastal cities such as San Francisco, New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, and Washington DC and work out the answer.
The idea is to focus on the more expensive parts of America, which can therefore translate into living in other expensive countries in the world such as Paris, Hong Kong, London, Tokyo. Of course, if you move to much cheaper places, you’ll be considered that much wealthier.
Various Income Levels
$50,000: Not rich, but lower middle class. After contributing $22,000 to your tax-exempt 401K and IRA, you are left with $28,000 in gross income to live. With an effective tax rate of about 15%, you have about $24,000 left after taxes. $24,000 or $2,000 a month is enough to live a frugal lifestyle, however, you’ll probably want to find a partner who makes at least $20,000 a year to be comfortable with a family.
The median household income in America is roughly $62,000 as of 2019.
$100,000: Not rich, but middle class. After contributing $18,000 to your tax-exempt 401k, you are left with $82,000 a year in gross income, and ~$61,500 net income based on a 25% total effective tax rate. Notice there is no more $5,000 tax-exempt IRA contribution because you make over $68,000. That’s right, the government doesn’t want you to save money if you make over $68,000.
Hopefully, you are following my savings guide and saving another 20% of your after tax income, equaling roughly $12,400 a year. You’ve got around $40,000 to spend on whatever you want and you’re breathing pretty good now.
$200,000: Upper middle class. After retirement contributions, you are left with $177,000 in gross income, leaving you with roughly $125,000 in after tax income. You boost your after tax savings rate to roughly 30%, leaving you with about $87,500 left.
By the time you are making $200,000 in your career, you’re probably in your 30s or older and have a mortgage and kids to consider. Kindergarten/daycare may run $15,000-$20,000 a year, followed by $30,000-$40,000 in shelter costs for a reasonable home. You’re left with $20,000-$40,000 to spend on food, travel, groceries, gifts, lessons, and so forth. Not bad.
$350,000: Still upper middle class. After retirement contributions, you’re left with $332,000 in gross income, or roughly $250,000 in after tax income. With a 30% after-tax savings rate, you have $175,000 left to spend. Your family has grown to 4, and you seek a bigger home. An average 3 bedroom, 2.5 bath home in a good area in San Francisco will run you about $1,300,000 to $1,700,000. We’re not talking anything super fancy at 1,800-2,800 square feet. Your mortgage at 3.5% on $1.1 million will therefore cost around $60,000 a year + $15,000 a year in property taxes.
I choose $1.1 million because that was the maximum level for mortgage interest deductibility before Trump came to office. As a result, you’re left with about $100,000, or $8,333 a month in after tax income for school for two, travel, food and so forth. You’re doing well, and if you are frugal, you can certainly save more than $75,000 a year in after tax money along with the $18,000 401K contribution.
See: Why Households Need To Make $300,000 To Live A Middle Class Lifestyle Today
$500,000+: You are rich! With $481,500 in gross income after maxing out your retirement contributions, you have about $300,000 in after tax income (effective at 35%, which includes 10% state). That’s right, you are paying around $183,000 in taxes alone, yet the government still wants to take more from you! Undeterred, you crank up your savings to 35%, and put away another $105,000, leaving you with $195,000. Subtract $70,000 for annual mortgage/property tax leaves you with $125,00. Then subtract another $40,000 in tuition for two.
With around $7,000 a month in money available for travel, food, entertainment, goods, gifts, you are sitting pretty, especially since you are putting away away $122,000 a year in savings. That said, there are couples still struggling to get by on $500,000 a year!
You don’t have to work for a living: You are also considered rich! If you have passive income that can cover your desired daily living expenses, then you have all the freedom in the world to do whatever you want. I have a target to make $250,000 a year in non-wage income because I spend less than that each year and still want to save a good portion of my income. Here is a great post on how to build more passive income for financial freedom.
Here’s a good net worth target to follow. After all, it’s not so much how much you make, but how much you keep. To be truly rich, you should aim for a net worth equal to 20X your average annual gross income or more.
Suggested net worth targets by age, income, work experience
The Rich Person’s Game Plan
* Depend on yourself. Earning a high level of income is a choice, no matter what the naysayers tell you. It is up to each of us to further our education to develop a skill-set that enables us to earn more. It is up to us to work longer than our peers, so that after 2 more hours of work a day, we’ll have made over 600 more hours of progress a year. Don’t you think you could develop something amazing with 600 hours of time? You know you can.
* Get a mentor. If you want to learn how to become wealthy, learn from someone who is already wealthy, not someone who tells you how to get wealthy without being wealthy. Those folks are charlatans, and some do it very well, which is why they are wealthy. Instead, seek out a mentor and do everything possible to ingratiate yourself into their circle. Successful people want to give back. It’s the way they are hardwired.
* Remove disabling beliefs from your mind. Wherever you go, there you are. You mind is either like a power plant of positivity, or a cesspool of negativity. You must believe in yourself, otherwise nobody else will. I am so internet/computer illiterate that I thought there was no way I could start a website, until one day in 2009 I said ,”fuck it” and got it done. I’m only slightly more literate than a doorknob now, but at least things are running and I can just do this full-time if so desired.
* Go the traditional route. Earning six figures and saving millions of dollars is straightforward. It just takes time. When you are incredibly rash, you do stupid things and screw up your financial goals. Save and invest even 10% of your income over 30 years and you will likely have more money than you will ever need.
* Be your own boss. Time and time again, you stumble across stupid things that turn out to be big hits. Twitter, for example, was one cockamamie idea that has revolutionized the way we communicate. Airbnb is another idea that has helped lower costs in the hospitality industry. Everybody should at least own their brand online by starting a website. I started FinancialSamurai.com in 2009, and by 2012, I was making enough to live a good life in expensive San Francisco. Now, I never have to go back to work again! Not a day goes by where I’m not thankful for starting this site.
Wealth Equalization Factor
Some of you who live in other parts of the country can live on much less than the amounts above. Meanwhile, public school systems are good enough where you are, so you’re willing to send the kids without fear of long-term failure. Hence, if it pleases you, take a 30%-50% discount to the above numbers.
The great thing about these income levels is that we’re only considering one individual. If you have a partner who earns even just $30,000 more a year, it goes a long way to helping out the family.
I’m of the mindset that we should maximize our income, so we can maximize our capital base, so we can sooner do what we really want and never have to worry about money again! Methodically saving money is the foundation of personal finance.
But the rich get rich by deploying their savings into assets that have the potential to increase in value. Decide to take action and watch your net worth grow beyond your wildest dreams over time!
Track Your Net Worth Like A Hawk
Sign up for Personal Capital, the web’s #1 free wealth management tool to get a better handle on your finances. You can use Personal Capital to track your spending, manage your net worth, and make sure you are not paying excessive investment portfolio fees with their award-winning Investment Checkup tool. I discovered I was paying $1,700 a year in fees I had no idea I was paying until I used Personal Capital.
After you link all your accounts, use their Retirement Planning calculator that pulls your real data to give you as pure an estimation of your financial future as possible using Monte Carlo simulation algorithms. Definitely check to see how your finances are shaping up as it’s free. There is no rewind button in life, so you might as well do the best you can now to make sure your finances are in good shape.
Updated for 2020 and beyond.
I am an “e-merchant” and have income that ranges from 500-600K per year. However, I am not counting capital gains and I think that should be taken into consideration for retirement purposes. On a “good” year where I can 10%, my net would shoot up to a bit over a million, a slow year would be 5% which would translate to 700-800K. So I think once you have that capital cushion it really alters the actual net income as most people perceive it. With that said, I could have retired years ago but I enjoy making money being a business owner.
I’m curious what would level would you consider someone that was living purely on interest from their savings? For example someone who had build up a savings up to 2 million dollars and was living on 4% interest per year which would be about 80,000 dollars and not touching the principal.
Anything that is enough to live on and never touch principal until perpetuity.
See: How To Build Passive Income In Order To Retire Early
“You will never get rich working for someone else.”
Sounded like total BS, he doesn’t work in tech sales I smugly thought. 10 yrs later my wife and I make $800k/yr living in San Francisco and the Samurai’s “barely making it on 500k” post was freakishly accurate. We feel very comfortable and fortunate (I know being raised on 18k/yr) but I will never feel rich until I can live a good life not at the whims of my employer.
I think someone who makes 80k passive and needs 60k to enjoy his life is richer than I am. My number is 200k passive, saving 50% of gross working on it! BTW new to the site but loving it!
Welcome to my site! It’s funny you mention you want to have $200k dollars a year in passive income because that has always been my goal as well since I left the grind in 2012.
Here’s my 2018 passive income update hitting $200,000 again: https://www.financialsamurai.com/financial-samurai-passive-income-update-2018/
First of all, I don’t understand how you can live on 30k when the average health Insurance plan is about 10k for your Income level. I know you have already subtracted federal, state and property taxes, because that is more than 30k. I also think most people underestimate the cost of children. You can give them the minimum, or you can pay for lessons ($60 per violin hour) and educational goodies that most kids thrive with. When you do have kids, things change – what if he/she needs expensive therapy or wants to go on that high school trip with the band? Or refuses to make his own lunch and needs lunch money? I applaud you keeping touch with your roots and saving for a rainy day. But I do know elderly millionaires who won’t even spring for a hearing aid. And I did know one who would not fix his plumbing (no running water or toliet). Don’t become too thrifty, unless of course it gives you great pleasure. I would do the vacations now because they get very expensive with a family of 4. Obviously you are very good with money, so I wouldn’t worry about becoming poor again. I grew up that way as well. I still remember the wish list of clothes I wanted for school that I did not receive (I circled them in a catalog)!
Great analysis from the old vault of Samurai ^_^. I can spend forever reading all the comments. I’ll chime in…
Our family makes 250k so we’re right on the border of Obama’s definition of middle class. But to me, middle class stops and tops at $150k. You can have all the comforts and some leftover to cushion yourself at $150k even with a larger family.
Our family of 3 lives on $30k a year (including home mortgage). Our expenses are pretty low. Without the mortgage we can keep under $1,300 a month. I’m not saying this to bronze my frugal badge, a race to the bottom of how lean you spend money is dumb. But we choose to live this way because it’s easy to be out of touch. I don’t want to forget who I am…the girl from the wrong side of the tracks.
Anyways, there’s not much we want that’s appealing to part with the money. I enjoy grocery hunting for deals, it’s a fun game for me. Vacations makes me nervous because I’m not productive during. Having no kids saves buckets too. We’ll have our children attend public school when the time comes.
So adjusted for our standard of living, I consider us rich. I wonder if we made $800k a year would our spending change much… probably not?
Am I all wrong or is everybody else crazy including the host. To me u cannot compare incomes in different parts of the country. You must compare disrectionary income after ones basic expences. That should be similar in likeness across the country. A European vacation or a lexus is about the same in Alabama as it is in California and so forth. That to me would be a much better way of telling if someone is rich or not. In my opinion If you can come up with 10k a month or 120k a year to spend on whatever floats your boat you have to be considered rich, not filthy rich but for the ordinary Joe, rich. That could be as little as 120k living off of mommy and daddy or 500k in SF with divorce and child support payments and a trophy wife with a couple more kids. To me it is all relative to what you have at the end of the day to spend on what you want, be it a vacation home , investments or a couple trips to the nude bar, whatever. My situation is i’m 60 been retired 4 years net worth 2.4m retirement assets 2m. I live on 105k yearly because that keeps me in the15% bracket. I spend only 2.5% of my retirement assets. I have 50 to 55k in discretionary income and have trouble spending that. I still am a value shopper but there is just so many vacations you can go on in a year. Life time habits are hard to break. Never made more than 89k. Lots of overtime. My wage was in the low 60’s when I left work. I live in a 275k home, slightly above the area norm and I always said pay off debt and spend below your means and save. Even with normal income over time you can accumulate a lot of money and still enjoy life. I always bought brand new homes and cars and paid cash for them, except the first one. I did have a mortgage for 7 years in the 80’s. Remember intrest rates were 12% back then. Be a smart shopper and and even smarter invester. I have made more money with investing that every cent i ever made on a paying job. Just my 2 cent. Thanks for listening
Your article makes me want to move to America. I live in Montreal, where Quebec’s highest income tax bracket starts at 104,000 and Canada federal highest income tax starts at 202,800. Salaries in Canada are generally lower than American and tax is much higher. So harder to save and accumulate wealth.
I’ve pasted the comment below from the original post I stumbled upon. All I can say is wow. Good job. Wish I was that good at write offs. Instead I pony up 35% of my revenue…….after all possible write offs. Guess I’m doing something wrong. Not so sure about deducting partially anything from income because you are a business / LLC. It still is to be a legitimate business expense.
After the accountant is done, I only paid taxes on 117k of the overall amount of 340k income.
It all varies per case, I have a business and a LLC so I can deduct practically anything from my income… is different when you have a set salary… you’re screwed.
I consider myself rich, point and simple.
– See more at: https://www.financialsamurai.com/how-much-income-do-you-consider-to-be-rich/#sthash.zE5kWP1q.dpuf
So if you get audited, will they find you overlap expenses? You make much more than us and we pay taxes on double that.
For all the commenters who are arguing that $250-400k isn’t that much in manhattan or sf – YES, IT IS, and here’s why. Living in those places gives you instant access to all the best culture that the world has to offer. Everyone else has to pay thousands to travel to those places to get that. You have chosen (wisely, imho) to pay big $$$ to have access to all that great stuff. To say you aren’t really rich because housing is so high would be like someone with $300k income in Alabama saying they weren’t really rich because they had to buy a boat for $150k so they’d have something fun to do.
I live in NH, which is a high-income/high cost of living place. Not manhatten or sf high, but high. I feel very comfortable with my $140k household income with a wife and 1 kid. The fact that we have 3 pensions between us that will replace about 80% of our current income and 2 401k plans makes me feel downright wealthy.
In my job as a high school teacher in Manchester I see what most people experience every day. 60% of the kids in my district receive free or reduced lunch. 25% live in poverty (less than $35k for a family of 4). Think of that the next time you want to complain that there just isn’t much left over after the $90k you spent on private school for your kids or the $700k you had to pay for a 3 bed 2 bath in a gated community.
Have you seen this post Fred? https://www.financialsamurai.com/how-to-make-six-figures-a-year-and-not-feel-rich-200000-income-edition/
Sure, the example family in the article are not rich, but you really had to hunt for a very narrow demographic to try to make your point. And nobody said $200k was rich. What if that same family made $250k? They’d have heck of a lot of disposable income. Some might even say they were rich.
The vast, vast majority of Americans, even in expensive areas, would be pretty darn comfortable with $200k plus incomes. According to the wsj, the Manchester-Nashua metro area (where I live) is the 10th wealthiest metro area in the country. I feel like I’m in the upper middle at $140k/year, and I say this as someone with many friends who earn much more.
People in this country need to start caring about the crazy high poverty levels here (much higher than any other developed country). It isn’t all the result of laziness, some of it is caused by those in positions of power taking way too much for themselves. Your website is contributing to the idea that too much is never enough. You’re really just trying to find a moral justification for selfishness.
The median price of a home in Manchester is $309,000. The average price of a home in manhattan is $800,000. Expensive is in the mind of the purchaser.
I make $450~$550k/year as a software engineer in silicon valley; single w/o kids. My starting salary was ~$85k less than 10 years ago so I’ve experienced almost every income level described here with comparable living costs.
When I was making between $85k to $150k, I had to be very careful with my spending. I had to constantly worry about how frequently I eat out, what kind of clothes I buy, and whether I own a car or not, etc… I certainly could not shell out a $200 dinner every month.
Then I stopped worrying about price tags on groceries, clothes, etc… when I started making ~$300k/year. At that income level, I didn’t care whether I spent $10 at McDonald’s or $200 at a stake house. I could go on any fancy dinner I want, and I didn’t have to worry about it if I didn’t do it every week.
Once I started making $400k+, I started to feel rich or entitled. I was willing to pay premiums for more luxurious services like airport lounges, and I didn’t mind spending another $1,000 at a different hotel if the hotel room I got in advance was unsatisfactory.
However, I still think your expense estimate is a bit too high. I can assure you that spending $70,000 on rent/mortgage is a financial suicide even at $500k/year income level.
For me, I’m still careful with my travel budget, drive an entry level luxury car (~$40k), and my rent is ~$2500/month. As a result, I “only” spend ~$85k a year and saved ~$300k (including 401k matches) last year alone.
You’ll enjoy these two posts:
Scraping By On $500,000 A Year
and
When Is It OK To Forsake Stealth Wealth And Live It Up A Little?
Yeah, those were interesting posts to read. I think one big different might be that those of us who work in Silicon Valley tend to have a shorter career cycle & our income tend to be a lot more volatile than those who work in other sectors.
It’s not uncommon for someone fresh out of an undergraduate CS program to hit $300k mark in a matter of a few years. I even heard of a Ph.D. student getting offered $10m worth of company stocks. (The most shocking part of the story is that the guy didn’t accept it!). At the same time, it’s possible for someone comfortably making $350k to get laid off one day, and left unemployed for years if not indefinitely if he hadn’t updated his/her skill set. iOS / Android app development wasn’t even a thing just ten years ago.
I can probably sustain my income level for another couple of years, but I can’t imagine doing so for the next ten years. As such, we’re a lot more conservative in how much we spend. In fact, I know many of my colleagues must have at least 5-10 million dollars in their investment / bank accounts (due to the company stock going up). But some of them still drive a Toyota and live in a rent-controlled apartment.
Also, for many of us in Silicon Valley, the fact we make so much money is almost a side effect. We’re lot more focused on working on an interesting project / product. I honestly don’t know what to do with all the extra money I earn. So in short of throwing my money away or spending on useless things, I just save them to prepare for a layoff or an early retirement.
To me “rich” means money is no longer an object. You can pretty much do whatever you want when you want, including not working any longer if you so choose. If you don’t have the capital built up to quit working, you aren’t rich no matter how much income you are generating.
For example, if you’ve racked up $200,000 in student loans going to law school or medical school, plus another $100,000 in credit card debt and buy an average house somewhere like San Francisco at $1MM+ you have a ton of overhead you have to carry such that even if you are making $500k per year or more you can’t stop working because you incurred so much debt to get you to where you are. In that example you can’t be rich until you’ve earned enough to pay off those debts and then accumulated a substantial capital base such that you could stop working if you wanted to.
Invaluable article ! I loved the details , Does someone know where my business could possibly get access to a sample TX TDLR 043AB version to work with ?
If 50 grand a year is lower middle class then that means being average is no longer middle class. Middle class is suppose to be the average (therefore 50 grand a year). If solidly middle class is 100 grand you need to make double what the average person makes to be middle class. There’s something wrong with this picture.
Hi , guys! Firstly , wanted to thank finsamurai dude )) I really like the article , learned a lot ! Secondly , want to ask you : ” What major I should choose to become rich ? I know doctors , especially neurosergeons , earn a lot , but it’s just not my field … I would love to own a business , maby even more than one , or a company . But I also need to think how I should pay my loans after I graduate .
Basically , I need to choose a major in
business field , so after I am done with paying those loans , it could help me in my own business and it has to be specific major , because , I think , nobody needs a person with business , or economics degree . Tell me if I am wrong , I am flexible and I trust you . Also can I start to earn a lot of money now , not like an average student . And by the way , I am in the 11th grade . And I also thought : “what if I run a landing page ?”
As you see I think about it a lot and I also did a lot of research , but I need an advice of a wealthy man … ! Appreciate any advice !
I know this sounds cliche, but it’s 100% true: Choose a major (or any form of education) that will help you start and run a successful business (of any form). Very few people become rich being wage earners (the typical lawyer, doctor, tradesman, path). And the ones that do, are the ones that have their own firm or business. As long as you are a salary / hourly wage earner, there is a cap as to what you can earn (i.e. there is only one of you and only so many hours in the day). Your time is a finite 24 hours per day, but once your money works for you, that time becomes infinite. Owning a business allows you to make your money work for you, instead of you working for your money.
HOWEVER, If you are completely set on getting a typical degree (law, medical, etc) at least make sure your end goal is to own your own firm or practice. Or invest the money you earn from your 9-5 into creating a business. And don’t stop there. Make sure you’re not a slave to your business. Invest in people that know more than you and pay them to run the business. It sounds difficult, but it’s actually a very easy model.
This is why you see a lot of people recommend real estate as a way to get rich (I personally am not a fan because you are limited on how good your credit is). But either way, the concept is the same in any business, whether you’re a real estate investor or otherwise: your money is making you money, YOU aren’t making you money. Once that concept sinks in, your revenue cap basically becomes pretty limitless.
This is coming from someone that works a few hours a week, and owns a multi-7-figure per year business. And I’m not a money genius – I’m actually just a regular 35 yr old man with an average IQ that followed a simple plan – and refused to give up at the first sign of trouble.
Thank you very much for your advice !Very good point !
You said making over 500000 a year is considerd rich. I strongly disagree with that!!
It is all relative to life style,If your making more then 500000 a year, your expected to live a certain lifestyle. Let’s just say I make 800000 a year with 5 kids after taxes that 800000 becomes 432000. Am a religious jew so I have to give another 10% of what I make to charity after taxes, with is another 43000 with leaves me with 389000.between schools and camps that cost me another 90000 that leads me with 300000. I live in brooklyn ny between my house and house bills 60000, that leavs me with 240000.between health,dental, car insuranche ,2 cars and a cell a phone bill that’s another 50000, that leaves me with 190000. Food for 7 people another 50000,that leavs me with a 140000, there is other expenses am not thinking about as a right this message but when all is said and done am left with 60k at the end of the year and that’s if know sudden things come into play like hurricane so u tell me if that’s considerd rich!!! I am not talking reactive to other people it might be called financhel stable but not rich,
Complaining about 90k in private school tuition won’t get a lot of sympathy. Neither will being left with $240k after “house and house bills”.
432k a year after taxes = rich. Not wealthy, because of your expenses, but rich. Seems like you’re blinded by those who aren’t donating 43k to charity and raising 5 children.
Can you do the $200,000 and higher salaries for single individuals? For instance for people who are studying medicine and do not see themselves getting married until they are in their late 30s, but will be making a at least $200,000 ten years prior to that.
Thanks, love the content!
Chicago, IL
I used to be poor. I used to think like you guys until I started my sm business and when it took off and I reached this level of income. It was exciting, I’ve never seen such big numbers but for some reason I couldn’t bring myself to spend (what if the bottom drops out right)? Well it did in a way. It’s not about high income, it’s how much you get to keep. After my taxes were done and I was told how much I felt kicked in the stomach. I was SHOCKED at the taxes. If I had spent the money I would have been in serious trouble. It was a real lesson.
After that I saw income very differently and learned that just because someone has a high income does not mean they are rich. I still feel kicked around each quarter, but I now save and invest to build my wealth. When we have enough wealth that it throws off enough income to support me and my family even if I don’t work (passive income) then I am truly rich.
I no longer have the drive or want to take on more responsibility to grow my company or increase my income and instead my drive is to increase my wealth to create passive income.
– It’s not how much you make, it’s how much you are allowed to keep,
– It’s not how much income you make, it’s the type of income, the best is passive income
– W2 income is the worst.
People need to get a real understanding between high income and wealth.
Very well said.
Erayp, not having to work at all is a great goal. I’m single, 31, no plans for kids, and make $90k in Charlotte, NC. While I do have a fixed-rate 30 year mortgage, I’m happy that I have my very own new 3 bedroom house…room for my Lego hobby! :) I’m able to save some and still have “fun” money left over each month.
I’ll probably never get an indoor pool, elevator, or Lincoln SUVA…but my car is paid off, student loan gone this year, and I’m lucky to work from home for a virtual company so there’s no rush hour or dressing up and I can sleep later.
I could never start a business. I’m too anxious/cautious, not a salesperson/extrovert type, paranoid about getting sued by customers/vendors, and dealing with the IRS once a year is enough for me!
My point is that it takes a certain type of person to start a business. I think the key for everyone though is getting an education, caring about your job/business enough so you won’t hate it and maybe even enjoy it, saving for retirement, and living within your means regardless of income level. No one is safe from death/accidents/cancer or even making silly money mistakes sometimes. We should all strive for more, but free time with good health and a stable living situation is probably more important than tax bracket for most people.
As several others have said, your numbers are way too high. “Upper middle class” and above is generally considered to be “the rich”, broadly speaking. In most places, a single person earning over $100‚000 a year would be considered “upper middle class” to some degree or another.
Louis Richards is absolutely correct. It doesn’t take a great financial background or a top flight education to know that 200k-300k is wealthy. It’s quite ironic actually. The person blessed enough to have all of this is probably going to be the same person that doesn’t realize how wealthy that is. I have the utmost respect for the people that earn their success and more times than not it IS earned. However one of the biggest issues in the world today is that we actually have people whose reality tells them that anything under 200k isn’t wealthy while there are people who would love just the opportunity to make a quarter of that. I grew up “poor” according to this article. I can safely say that I will have a fair amount of success as I continue my career and will certainly make over 100k a year. One of the most important things that I hope to remember is what a blessing it really is. I absolutely have earned everything I’ve gotten. Yet, I could never EVER claim to have done anything that someone else couldn’t do with the same opportunities that I’ve fallen on. I would have to assume that you are extremely wealthy. You’ve earned it. However, there is a whole world out there beyond the San Francisco’s.
$200-$250K per year here and nope, we are not rich. We live in a moderately priced market in California (3 bed 2 ba 1900 SF home). Have two incomes, two kids in day care, and after maxing out our 401Ks and maintaining the 6 months cash reserves balance, we have very little left over. We don’t eat out much at all. We don’t drive expensive cars (I have a company car and wife’s car is paid off and has 120K miles on it). We don’t go on lavish vacations, or even spend much on gifts and other forms of entertainment. Also, we have no debt, we never consider touching our home’s equity, and save the amount needed to pay for two year old twins attending college at the same time in the future (1200 per month when you use financial calculators and the growing cost of college). So what’s left over after groceries and bills are paid? Not a heck of a lot. I consider our family “comfortable middle” class but definitely not rich. Come over for dinner and I’ll show you!
You are still in the top 5%, believe it or not. That does not make you middle class, although in your area, it would put you in the middle of the demographic. So, yeah, it can be difficult to live on that when you’re expenses are high (I’m in the SAME boat), but we can’t argue that we are middle class! We just live like it – while enjoying what the 5% can – like living in that elite area.
I am sorry, but you are way off. I totally disagree. I am not sure what circles of friends you hang around with. Nor do I know what your personal income level is as well as any of your friends.
But this much I can ASSURE you. Saying $200,000- $350,000 a year is “middle-class” at ANY level is simply an INSANE statement. Comments like that normally come from Rich people… Because that much money is nothing to them and they can only equate it to terms of middle class they are so rich.
I am 54, and I am a working-class man. I am self-employed and do quite well in life. I have been, since I own a service business, into thousands of people’s houses and have talked to thousands of people. I have friends that range from crack addicts to CEOs.
There’s one thing I can assure you, there is absolutely nothing about that income range that equals middle class. The vast majority of people in the United States do not have jobs that pay anywhere NEAR that income level. I don’t know where you are getting these figures at, but they are way off-base.
Not too many people make $300,000 a year my friend. It’s pretty much limited to doctors and attorneys and those type people. The vast majority of this country’s citizens work in the service industry. They are waiters and waitresses, cooks, electricians and plumbers, carpenters and real estate agents, auto mechanics and landscape people. They simply don’t make that income level!
Anybody making a 1/4 million a year in salary? Is Middle class? GET A GRIP. I absolutely guarantee you they are considered WEALTHY in the US of A. And once again, annual income level is a joke anyway. Someone who makes $300,000 a year and lives in a three quarter of a million dollar home, who has no disposable income, doesn’t have much. Somebody like me, that makes $150,000 a year, with $30,000 a year in bills, has much more disposable income and is much more wealthy. Not income anyway, but savings account balances and how much free money they have yearly is the ultimate clue of wealth. I know many rich people, living in million-dollar homes, can’t scrape together $1,000.
I would gather to say, without being too sarcastic, you my friend are a millionaire. Because only rich people could possibly think that income level is middle-class. Talk to anybody who truly is middle-class, and they would kill to earn that much money.
Is your reality more real than my reality?
The median price home in Manhattan and SF is around $1 – 1.2M. That is 4-6X a $200,000 – $300,000 household income.
Take any area in the country, and divide the median home price by 4-6, and I would say that is pretty middle class e.g. $300,000 home = $50,000 – $72,000 household income.
Yes, you are rich, and others are poor. Are you sure you’re not out of touch with reality?
Read my latest posts:
Spoiled Or Clueless: Try Working Minimum Wage Jobs As An Adult
Living In An Expensive City Can Make You Richer, Happier, and More Diplomatic
How To Make Six Figures A Year And Still Feel Middle Class
Are you actually trying to equate income levels with median price home sales??? Listing as an example no yet, two of the most expensive markets in America? That’s what your information is based upon? No wonder it is askew. You want to say for people who live in San Francisco, that is the middle class range, fine, whatever, conversation over.
But using an income level that adheres to a vary narrow and specific market, than using it as a blanket calculation over all of citizenship in America, is not only inaccurate math, but frankly, a very bizarre math.
Have you factored in places like Kansas, Wyoming, Tennessee, Kentucky, areas where there are many other median home prices, or just the two most expensive in the nation?
Of course. Income and home sales are tied. Using ratios let’s you realize that just because someone makes $250,000, doesn’t mean they are rich if it takes 4-6X that level to buy a home. Ratios helps readers who visit from all over America with different cost of living standards. It helps factor in places like “Kansas, Wyoming, Tennessee, Kentucky, etc” as you ask.
May I ask how old you are, and some of your financial and educational background?
So, let me put it this way. I own a 14-year-old, updated home in a fantastic, suburban area. 3br, 2ba, about 1470 sqft on a 14,000 sqft lot in a cul-de-sac. $223,000 with ~$2000 annual property tax.
We bought the house in 2011. I’m in my early 30’s make about $160,000 a year and have been at this income level for about 7 years (I was at about $70k before that), and my wife is a stay-at-home mom (she was a minimum wage earning college student when before the birth of our daughter). It took us about 3 years to pay the mortgage off entirely. We also own outright a 2012 Maxima and a 2014 Honda Fit. Our home is fully decorated, our fridge, freezer, and pantry always well-stocked, and my wife has an impressive collection of shoes and clothing. We take extended (~2 week) trips annually, either overseas or to some other part of the US, and generally splurge but already have just shy of $70k in savings (and growing) not counting my old 403b I rolled over into an IRA and my 401k from my current employer . My wife also just began studying to be a pharmacy tech, which will earn us an additional 30K annually.
We don’t ever worry about money, especially since we don’t have a mortgage or car payments. We knew how to be frugal when we needed to, but that hasn’t been necessary for years, in any way. That said, I certainly don’t consider myself rich, but upper-middle class? Absolutely. We’ve had our eyes on potentially upgrading to a 4-5br 3-4ba, 3000+sqft home in the foothills for some time now, which run about $450,000-$500,000 in our area. Since moving into our home, the value has gone from $223k to over $300K, so it would be a simple matter to use our equity to trade-up and up with a mortgage smaller than $100k.
The house we have now is one that I would consider to be fairly standard suburban middle class, but the houses we’ve been looking at are upper-middle class by any definition.
I don’t care how much these houses would cost in San Francisco, Beverly Hills, or New York City. That is absolutely irrelevant. I don’t live in either of those places, or have any desire to. I love the city I live in, and I have a very comfortable life.
I would absolutely consider myself upper-middle class. I honestly don’t know what my net worth is, really, but I have zero debt, decent savings, a healthy retirement account, and enough disposable income that I don’t even really pay attention to it anymore.
I apologize, but I think this article is grossly out of touch for anybody who doesn’t live in the most expensive parts of the US.
We’re talking about what is considered RICH, not upper middle class.
Sorry, I feel I should clarify – my point is that rich is relative, and ill defined, but that this article also does a pretty miserable job of adequately defining it. I am certain that by the definitions of many, I would qualify as rich. I pay about as much in income tax as my wife is expecting to earn when she starts working her job making well over minimum wage. When I was younger, I would have said that a rich person is someone who doesn’t worry about money anymore, and I’m at that point. At this point, while I don’t consider myself “rich”, I’m not even sure what that means anymore.
Why is $500,000 the bottom range for “rich”? Why not $1,000,000? Why not $1,000,000,000? Even my own definition is arbitrary at best. I’m well into the top 10% income bracket. I make three times as much as the average American, but I don’t like to consider myself rich for stupid reasons like, “Well, I couldn’t really afford a private jet or a 30 meter yacht, so I guess I’m not rich”, while my wife occasionally shops at Agent Provocateur for $300 bras.
Honestly, though, if I don’t consider myself rich at my current income level, I doubt I would at $500k, either.
It’s because you aren’t rich, but middle class, which is something to be proud of. I wouldn’t waste time envying the rich. But to stick to the facts of the article, if you do not believe in the governments definition of rich, the IRS definition of rich, my definition of rich that is fine. But at least try to add some value and define what you think is rich instead of renting against this article. Otherwise you’re just wasting everybody’s time. Come on, step up and provide some value and academic rigor behind the definition of rich.
What I define as rich is largely irrelevant. What I’m trying to get at is that when I was at an income level that was closer to the US average, I would have considered my current income and lifestyle to be “rich”, especially if I lived in one of the houses that we are considering buying (landing squarely in the “Executive Home” or mansionette category.
I believe this perception is common among people in that income category (that is, the majority of Americans). Seriously – ask someone who makes $55k to look at someone with a three year old luxury sedan and a well-decorated, $500k, 3500sqft home, and have them tell you if they consider that person rich. They would almost certainly say yes. I make more money than any of my family or close friends, and I’ve had this debate with them before.
The fact that I still feel that it is debatable is the entire point. Maybe it means I’m out of touch – but my friends and family would argue that I am “rich”, and I would argue from my current perspective that I am not. A decade ago, I would have agreed with them.
I actually just asked my brother about this, in response to this conversation, and I mentioned the houses we were looking at. His feedback was that the fact that the controversial issue keeping us from simply buying one of these houses (which he straight up considers to be mansions) right now is that, if we waited a couple years, we could pay cash, means that we are rich. “Middle class people don’t pay cash for their homes. Only rich people do.” was his general conclusion.
Again, my former definition of a rich person would have been “A person who makes enough money that, given their chosen lifestyle, makes active accounting of their finances unnecessary to accrue savings.” People who live the life they want and don’t worry about money.
My bar for that has moved, though, like I said. Now I would say that anyone who is truly financially independent would be considered rich. If I could retire right now and continue my current lifestyle for the rest of my life, then I would consider that rich.
Again, though, I don’t live in Manhattan or San Francisco. I have a 2500sqft home in Richland, WA. If I lived in San Francisco, I would have to live much, much more simply.
I think that most people in America would agree that what Obama defines as rich is, in fact, rich, especially for people not living in the most experience areas in the country.
You, on the other hand, haven’t actually explained why you consider $500k rich, as opposed to $400k, either. We can throw numbers around all we want, but nothing we can throw around is going to be true for all people.
If we use the dictionary definition of rich as “having abundant possessions and especially material wealth” then we still don’t have a specific answer. What one person considers abundant is spare to another. That will never change.
$500k is my definition of rich based off what I’ve written in the post. I have made anywhere from $15,000 a year and close to $1M a year and based on my experience, $500K is an appropriate income cut off. What has your income earning range been and number of years worked? Have you been chronicling your personal finance journey for the past 7 years?
Another great definition of rich is not having to work for money because your passive income or multiple passive income streams cover your costs completely.
Read this post: https://www.financialsamurai.com/how-to-build-passive-income-for-financial-independence/ and let me know if you agree.
Wealth is determined by net worth, not income. Many high income earners often do not save or invest. Live below your means, no matter your income. Wealth is having choices. Learn to cook and make choices about what is worth a splurge. Pick a good spouse and invest in your marriage if you get married. Divorce is expensive. Do not be follower. Don’t worry about impressing others, most are in debt and don’t know what wealth is. Don’t spend, invest your time and money in worthwhile pursuits. Diversify. Take care of your health. Do not equate your value as a human to your wealth. Some of the richest people don’t have a lot of money. Also, never take advice from people who have not achieved what they advise about.
I agree. Check out these two posts:
The Average Net Worth For The Above Average Person
The Rise Of Stealth Way To Stay Invisible From Society
I have trouble believing some of the figures that you mention regarding tax and all of that stuff. I make approximately 450k and I my effective tax rate is around 76% or 106k. So how is that someone making 500k pays close 200k in taxes?
76% x $450,000 is what?
$106,000 in total tax
Sorry I was made an error my effective tax rate is 25-27 % and obviously in the 39.6% marginal income tax bracket. Sorry for the confusion
Look at the bright side. You are making huge money without needing tax math!
What do you do to make so much?
Physician
Really?
You earn $450,000…….
Nvm, ignore my comment :)
From what location did you determine these numbers? I only ask because you made reference to a Californian city to equate spending power of a certain salary.
I am from Alabama, a generally rural state with one of the lowest cost of livings. Southern living is fairly affordable. For example, a 3 br 2 ba, 1500 Sq foot home in San Diego runs about $499,000 vs in Alabama cities it might run you $123,000. Affordible on a $50-$60,000 per year salary and certaibly NOT lower middle class.
But I certainly understand how in NY, CA, or even certain cities in TX and FL may find that salary difficult to achieve a comfortable living.
In live in SF bay area and a 3 bed 2 bathroom house in a nice (but not amazing) suburban area cost at least 1 million. A 3 bedroom 2 bathroom house in sf city in a nice area would cost at least 2 million.
You talked about those with capital and very little income and about how it could be quite good. You also talked about how there are many different ways of being in that position. Then you went on to define wealth by income alone. Something is missing.
If a person has five million dollars in the bank earning virtually no interest, that’s virtually no income. Put three kids through college and find out that they are going to graduate school and you could see that plummet.
Now suppose you invest in a mixture of securities and get an average of about 12%. Suddenly you are getting $600K/year in income and are clearly in your rich category. But what if you put all your money in stocks that don’t pay dividends, and sell almost nothing for the year? You have no capital gains, but you sell off $100,000 worth of securities to pay your living expenses. You did that by selling $89,000 worth of securities that appreciated at about 12%, ended up being worth $100,000 and that gave you a capital gain of around $11,000. So what’s your annual income? It turns out you are a pauper. At the same time, you had about $589,000 in unrealized gains. If $100,000 isn’t enough to fit your lifestyle, you can still double or even triple that and you are still not even approaching lower middle class.
Realistically you might be able to sell your least appreciated securities and even sell those that represent a capital loss and reinvest what you don’t spend, making sure to sell enough appreciated securities to prevent a huge capital loss carry over. You might not want to sell your securities that are appreciating the most on the grounds that they represent the best companies and are best in the long run.
This example might be extreme and might not be achievable assuming you don’t hold for the sake of holding but know when it’s in your best interest to move investments. Yet it does show that income can be whatever you want it to be, has little to do with net worth, and if you decide you want to be rich in a given year so you can buy something big, you can do it. Then you can go right back to being a pauper and spending as much as you want to live a rich person’s lifestyle.
Please, for those complaining about not being rich (and yes my income level is like yours, and not I’m not saying you didn’t work hard for you money, and yes I’m sure it was ethical) – but yet says after paying my rent in NYC, of SF, or paying for private school..I only have…
Living in expensive areas like NYC or SF is luxury. If you think cost of living is so high, why stay, cause you like the ‘vibe’, restaurants, museums, clubs, art house movie houses, wine-bars, big stores, etc…. ? So you are paying for that, and you enjoying the luxury of having money. Lets not even go into private school….
You are saying it as it is. We live in a free country and are highly mobile.
It is kind of frightening though how much real estate prices have moved beyond the normal income levels in SF and NYC though.
I get it…. I made very little when I was young. I lived at home thru most of college and have always worked very hard. I was given some opportunities but created most of them. Over the years I obtained three degrees. Two in business with a concentration in finance and one in accounting (also obtained a CPA & CFA designation). Over the past twenty years of working I’ve learned a lot….
Let me tell you how this really works. Most people make enough money to get by even the “Rich”. Some do it in a bit more style. Some are very disciplined and they save a good part of it (savings also know as delayed consumption). Along the way they pay 30-50% in taxes (FICA, SUTA, FUTA City, State, Federal and sales tax). Then when they are in the last years of life and they are lucky enough to have savings, health care costs will take up a great portion of the estate and in many cases drive the people into near bankruptcy. I had a parent in assisted living and it can run 80-120k a year depending on the level of care. That will wipe out most estates quickly.
Then you die and if you are lucky, hard working, entrepreneurial enough your estate will pay up to 50% in estate taxes. Unless you are crazy rich then money gets divided between the government and heirs pretty quickly and will disappear relatively quickly.
Just as an example looked at one of the world’s richest people ever John D. Rockefeller. He’d be worth $200-300 billion inflation adjusted today. If you looked at Senator Jay Rockefeller, the great grandson he has a Net Worth of $100 million. Don’t get me wrong that is a lot of money but in 3-4 more generations the Rockefeller name won’t mean you have a hundred million or billion dollars because the wealth would have been almost completely redistrubted via taxes and children by then.
In most situations the best you can hope for is to lead a conservative life and teach your kids good values and morals as well as give them the skills to fend for themselves. Because unless you are in the .1% of the population you can’t really sit on your butt and get anywhere not being a productive member of society…..
So to the angry people who looks at the rich in disgust. Most worked their ass off to give their families a decent go of it. And to summarize, when a newspaper reported asked John D Rockefeller’s attorney “how much did he leave” the lawyer responded ” all of it”.
why should i care about rich people ‘only’ taking home 300k after taxes?? Do you realize how many people are being neglected from the US shit social services? How many people are dying from lack of healthcare families who are struggling to make it on our criminal minimum wage. That being said we could easily provide free healthcare education and housing if we didnt spend half of our budget on imperialistic wars for oil. IMO if you can comfortably afford food healthcare and a place to live you are rich since only a small minority of people can say they have this.
everyone cant just increase their income money isnt just spontaneously generated there is a fixed amount of it or at least a fixed amount of the power it signifies. As long as wealth is concentrated at the top poverty will remain. Even middle class people in america depend on the exploitation of billions of people to extract cheap resources and manufacture cheap clothing and food. We live on a planet with finite resources which we must all share to survive. However a small amount of people control those resources which is why more than half of all people on earth make less than a dollar a day. This wont change from having a better outlook or mindset thats bullshit the rich make up to make stupid people think they can work themselves into wealth.
I live in Minneapolis and in this town $350k puts you in the lower part of the upper class rather than the upper part of middle class. Above this income I think income taxes are much more of a concern. We have a high State tax rate. I make over $500k a year, but not much more than that and my total income taxes are a bit over $300,000 a year.
I’m not sure where I fall, but I make $90k/year before taxes. I’m single, 31 years old, college-educated, and able to buy a $168k new, 3 bedroom 2-story house in Charlotte, NC all by myself. While I have a fixed-rate 30 year mortgage, I’m paying extra on it and my new 2013 Ford Focus (leather seats, GPS, back up camera, park assist…honestly, same features as BMW) is paid off and my student loan will be finished this year.
While I have a mortgage and a negative net worth until it’s either paid off or I have more saved, I’m super happy to be able to have my own house by myself and still have money to spend on “fun” as well as save. Working for a company remotely has GREATLY increased my happiness by waking up later, less gas, no rush hour or dressing up.
Part luck, part work, part being appreciative. While I’d love a massive house with an elevator and indoor pool and more space for my Lego hobby, I’m also not willing to risk money/time, raise capital, get sued, or do the conplex work in starting a company. I’m too anxious and cautious for all that.
I think class is more than just wealth. It’s spending wisely, saving, and planning a career if not starting a business. You probably won’t be ultra wealthy, but in the end I just want a decent house, good health, and the ability to retire at a reasonable age to enjoy hobbies more. Free time with good health and a stable living situation is the ultimate wealth to me.
People compete so much for designer clothes, popularity, fame, the next million, plastic surgery, fancy cars… All that sounds great, but won’t necessarily make you happy. Strive for more, but don’t get discouraged because someone else always has better X than you.
You’ve captured it perfectly. Eventually a mansion is just like any other house and a bentley is just like any other car once you get used to it. The problem is most very high earners sacrifice their time for money, and never even get to enjoy the fruits of their labor. Saved time, reduced stress, no commute, no depressing cubicle, no workplace politics etc as a result from working remotely is the ultimate freedom. You’re basically retired at this point in terms of freedom. You could be working from the beach in the south of France if you wanted to and no one would be able to tell. In my opinion if you’re making $200k working 50 hours a week from home, you have it better than someone making $500k working 80 hours a week from an office. I definitely wouldn’t trade my freedom and time to make an extra $300k for added stress and more hours. I wouldn’t even have time to enjoy it and even if I did, more vacations, a bigger house, more toys etc over what the $200k can already afford me isn’t going to make me any happier. In fact I would be more depressed from the stress.
One thing that I have realized is that in US majority of people are obsessed with wealth…. by wealth I mean materialistic objects, cars massive homes etc. I have a cousin who has been working his butt out to become a millionaire, last year alone he has made close to $500k but at what cost? He worked 24/7, spent a little time with his daughter and barely anyone else. I have experienced a civil war in my own country and have actually seen true value of materialism… basically it is 0… I realized that when I had liitle I was happiest then so now All I do is travel at any opportunity I get. I make half of my cousin but I have twice as much time to spend with loved ones. Enjoy every moment that you can grasp because you will never get it back. Many people never even reach retirement age. Plan for your retirement but don’t bank of it. Everyone has a right to choose their own path, I don’t envy rich because I bet they really worked hard to get there but what they value in life might not neccessarily mean much to me.
Honestly, after skimming this article and reading most of the comments, I belive that “rich” or the idea of being or not being wealthy is all in your head and up to you to decide. It’s not about how much money you make, but how you spend it. I don’t know, I’m omly 15, however, I do know when I get older I will make alot of money and I defiantly will be considered rich!!!!!!
Plenty of ignorance here. Wealth and income are two different things. Wealth is about net worth. You can have a high net worth with ZERO income, or a low net worth with a high income.
Check out this latest post I just wrote:
Focus On Building Net Worth Even More Than Growing Income
Hi. I have a question. I’m in college now, and will be for the next 4-6 years. I’m planning to be a CRNA. All said and done, I’ll have 100-150k in debt, which I’m okay with. The median pay for CRNA is about 150k in the US at the moment. My big worry was when I was planning on savings, debts, lifestyle, etc., I didn’t take into consideration the humongous amount taxes take out. I imagined far less than 30%. So, my question is, how can people with less, justifiably ask for those with more to pay more, when I myself would be making more than the national average but not making enough to be what I consider rich? Also, what ways can I save money from federal taxes?
Note: I plan to move to Washington state where there is no state income tax.
Note: I live in Texas at the moment, so even if I had to work for a year here before moving, I would still not have to pay state income tax.
Note: I plan on being single as long as possible. I’m 18 at the moment.
Thanks Financial Samurai!
This is such a load of BS!!! Whoever wrote this, is obviously completely ignorant to the reality of the common/average persons financial situations and what’s considered a good and decent salary and standard of living. Do not listen to this pile of crap and do not be discouraged. The only thing that matters, is how you feel about your standard of living and what you consider to be “rich”, but more important, happy. Anyone who does not feel rich with $400K, or even $150K per year, is either a complete moron when it comes to managing money, or a pompous douchebag who refuse to buy a scarf that cost less than $10.000……
…and I live in L.A.
this is discouraging.. im a freshman in college ( fidt class is aug 25 2014) my husband and i make about 1600 a month and have a son and pay 685 rent 150 electric … what are some steps we can take to better our financial situation..
Your article is accurate considering you specifically stated that your only referring to high COL areas when you are talking about income levels. However, overall the limits are much lower in the USA for being defined as “rich” and “upper middle” class. For example:
An income of 100K puts you in the
-Top 20th percentile of all households in the USA. Based on the economic definition of upper middle class, that certainly qualifies as upper middle class income.
-Top 7th percentile in terms of individual income. Your still upper middle class in terms of income but probably towards the top of the range when considering individual income.
Now defining what income in general would qualify as “rich” in general is subjective upon what percentile would be considered “rich.” Do we go by the top 5%? 2%? 1%? .5%? Off the top of my head I believe 400K puts you at the 1% of households if we use that as a benchmark of rich.
I think your levels are actually a bit conservative. I don’t consider anything below 7 figures a year anywhere close to being rich. The truth is, the majority of the individuals that think “200k” is rich have never experienced that level of income. They’re not speaking from experience. I know a lot of people that make between 200-300k per year and not one considers themeselves rich. The very interesting twist is that they had always considered that level of income rich BEFORE they were actually earning it.
I am in the same boat. I actually grew up very very poor. Up until recently I’ve stayed poor. I just turned 33, and had my first 7 figure year last year….and worked extremely hard to get to that point. Prior to success, I had always envisioned the point I would hit 100k, I’d be rich. Once I hit that level it was very underwhelming once I realized how much I had to give back to the government, as well as how expensive it is to live well in this country. People don’t understand all the intricacies of expenses, taxes, etc of a 6 figure income until they actually hit that point. My 7 figure year last year resulted in over 50% federal/state tax alone. And it doesn’t stop there, believe it or not.
The point: those without actual first hand experience earning a specific amount of income have no solid ground to base their opinions on about that income level. Zilch. Nada. First hand experience trumps second hand opinions.
I have a unique perspective on living both extremes on the wealth spectrum and can honestly say that anyone that thinks 200k is rich is either extremely frugal or they have simply never hit that income level. I’m sure the latter makes us 99% of the scenarios.
Actually, the numbers are all based off my firsthand experience.
Can you share with us your age and net worth too?
Thx
Oh, I wasn’t referring to you. I’m sure you’ve experienced the income levels first hand. I was referring to the commentors that think we’re crazy to believe 200k is not rich. However, how can they have any opinion on it until they’ve actually experienced it? It’s not the ’60s anymore, 200k doesn’t get you as far as some may think. It’s crazy how expensive life can be, even if you have a humble house, cars, toys, etc. 200k is well off and comfortable-ish. But rich? No way. Talk to my buddies that pull in 7-8 figures per MONTH. They live a rich lifestyle. 200k is not rich by any stretch, unless you live in Thailand or something. If you live in SF, 200k is barely middle class. I know, because I’ve live there making a little over 200k not too long ago at ancestry.com branch. First hand experience.
BTW – I’m 33. Net worth is low 8 figures, but soon to be less as we’re buying a new home. I’ve worked very hard for what I have, but there’s always an aspect of luck and chance involved. I’ve had my share of lucky breaks and not-so lucky breaks.
contribute to a roth ira if single and make less than 114000/year. you can contribute up to the max
I’m sorry but this article just plain sucks sucks. The author should try googling “social class in the usa” because there is no way in hell that 100k income is middle class. In fact, earning 100k a year means you make more money than 93.4% of people in America. Source: Wikipedia.
The median wage in USA is about 32k a year. At 250k a year you are in the 1%. Consider yourself educated.
He is only talking about high cost living areas. 100k may be upper class in a low cost area but in Arlington va where the median home prices are ~600k, you are middle class making 100k. To me, it’s a matter of what the median household income is in the area. Arlington’s is around 100k, so how does being at the average for an area make you rich? My personal definition of rich would be the top 10% income wise for any given area, which is probably close to what Sam lists.
Half the country is also on government aid, that don’t earn enough to even pay a positive in net taxes.
Rich isn’t a comparison to how much you make compared to a group of poor people. Rich is a lifestyle regardless of how much others make, and if you think 100k is enough for a rich lifestyle you’re off your rocker. Especially if you live in high cost areas, where 100k is literally near poverty and Especially if you’re married with kids in a high cost area. My friend just got a lower management job at 115k salary in SF, and is married with 3 kids. Not long ago he commented on how he felt more wealthy as a poor single college student, living off small student loans, than he feels now. No house, drives an older civic, and not much debt. Life is expensive and little things add up!! His rent alone is ridiculous for how small his apartment is.
100k as a single person in Texas or Indiana may pass off as a wealthy lifestyle, but that’s severely pushing it. The dollar isn’t worth what it used to be. Especially not in SF or NY.
Exactly! I live in the north east, where $150K is consider middle class, and most people pay $20K in City Taxes alone. When it comes to pays cal it all depends on location.
It seems that we are using an economic model, whose language is outdated; to describe wealth and the lack of any financial resources. Take the myth of the “1%”. If for simplicty’s sake, we make believe we are talking about a 1% comprised of single adults, then we are talking about apx. 3 million Americans. At the center of this vast hoarding of wealth are 447 billionaires. Which leaves me wondering if the $500,000 marker represents the lowest rung(the poor) of the wealthy?
So much ignorance here. Income and net worth are two different things. The are people with low incomes who are multi-millionaires, and there are people who make 300K and are broke.
Exactly. It’s all about being net worth wealthy and income poor to take advantage of Obamacare subsidies!
https://www.financialsamurai.com/2013/10/23/subsidy-amounts-by-income-limits-for-the-affordable-care-act-obamacare/
Another important point is stealth wealth.
https://www.financialsamurai.com/2013/11/04/the-rise-of-stealth-wealth-guide-to-staying-invisible-from-society-rage/
I made 235k last year on logistics, I own no debt, my housed is paid (nice 35k rathole), still single (engage) and owned my first car still (2005 Saab).
Not much of a spender, don’t really buy fancy crap or have the use for fancy gadgets besides smartphones
All and all, I’m projecting to be making 500k a year by the time I’m 35, I’m crossing my fingers for now, I’m currently making my incredible income based on a handshake and good relations, I could loose it all tomorrow if they choose it to be, which is the reason I started investing outside my field, I bought a 150k bread route that is netting me 950/wk after all cost including driver. I’m thinking on buying 1-2 every yearon separate companies (Pepsi, Fedex, Tastycake) and keep myself diversified. I think when I’m making about 10k a week I will relax and call it a day.
I at my age, 27, I consider myself very lucky and successful, at least compare to the rest of my family. It was more luck than investment, and or prudent planning to be honest, but you know what they say: Better to be lucky than good.
I like this article. I was curious about the various income levels and what people would consider rich or well off. Out of all of the sites I read it seems everyone has their own perception of what rich is. I guess that the term rich is subjective. It seems to depend upon a persons point of reference. A person with lower income would probably feel being rich begins at a lower threshold than someone who has a high level income. That’s just my two cents.
I find it interesting that you say the following:
“$350,000: Still upper middle class. ” – And apparently not rich…
Very interesting. Especially considering your own blog points out that the upper 1% of Americans make greater than $350,000. So what exactly are these people at $350,000 being the “upper middle” part of?
The best definition I have seen for middle class is 3-12 times the level of poverty.
3-6x or $51,000-101,000
6-9x or $101-151,000
9-12x or $151-204,000
Still that isn’t quite right considering 50% make less than $34,000.
Everyone wants to think they are middle class but even the above numbers show that those in the 3-12x the level of poverty group make up only about 20% of Americans.
Hmm, never heard of a multiple based off poverty. Is this not somewhat of a defeatist attitude? Saying you have 5x more income than poverty just sounds weird.
I’m basing the numbers in my article off housing and living costs in the most expensive parts of the US and the world.
Median home price is $600,000-$700,000 in SF and that buys you junk. I don’t call having an income half the value of your house rich.
Best to use high comparables to be conservative.
Hmm…
I think the figures are OK for ridiculously expensive cities like NY, SF or LA.
which you correctly admit but thats not representative of what most of the country is like.
even with NY & SF, I don’t think most people make that much.
median incomes from these cities will prove my point.
its just that overcrowding puts pressure on real estate and inflates prices.
True, but most people are not rich. This post aims to discover the definition of rich.
Here is a good follow up post on how people survive a comfortable life making less than $100k in Manhattan.
https://www.financialsamurai.com/2013/07/05/how-do-people-to-live-a-comfortable-life-making-less-than-100000-in-expensive-cities-like-new-york/
I like how you break it down very well. But there seems to be more to it than just the numbers alone to me.
For example, I feel that I am in a better situation making 160k a year than my friends who make 250k+ a year. I happen to save more money than they do when all said and done. This all depends on how much you spend and what your expenses are. To me if you can make 150k but you can live a lifestyle of about 50k your doing great! But if you make 250k but your lifestyle is maxed out that your spending 200k of it. Who is in a better situation in the long run?
Sorry if my points and questions are off topic. I tend to do that a lot.
Like your response. Debt to income ratio here
This is quite a clique – when most of the country is living with median incomes just shy of 50k, here we are complaining about how really not rich we are. What a bubble. Since I know people in the real world that are not like myself, top 4% and all, let me just say Obama is right. 200k is rich, with opportunity, if you make the most of it. That taxation is an incentive for everyone to do so. We got a good deal, and frankly squandered the two tax cuts that W put on credit card, which just went to a big red debt mound. Reversing that will compel people to put their capital to better work and yields. It has singularly put a number of states including Calif back in surplus for the first time in decades as capitalist sell off their gains now to avoid higher gains taxes later. That is the way it’s suppose to work.
I know this is an old post but – this irks me – the Bush tax cuts did NOT cause significant deficit spending. A commonly stated thing but factually off-base. From 2000-2007, federal taxes collected went up at a CAGR of 4%! And that was at the previous peaks high which had dotcom bubble and y2k spending. The reason the deficit went nuts is because federal spending went up at a 7% CAGR. Blame Iraq/Afghanistan, Medicare Part D, No Child Left Behind, etc but there is no empirical proof the tax cuts caused significant deficits.
One other thing – the effect tax rate the rich paid during the Bush years was basically the same as the 50s and 60s. Virtually no one paid the headline top rates – many, many things were tax deductible back then that aren’t today. This is why they added the Alternative Min Tax at 21% on the super rich – because 140 millionaire incomes paid 0 taxes the year before. The rich have paid an effective tax rate of between 18-25% since WW2.
Great read! I completely agree with your assessment of the levels of income and it varies by locale. Just turning thirty and my wife and I gross approx. 470k. We were making 200k annually a couple years ago, and did not feel rich by any means especially considering kids in near future. I must say though, 470k in Austin, TX is very comfortable. No state income tax, although high property tax but the housing is not like California or NYC. We were able to get a great place on the lake for 700k, so shelter costs are relatively low. The area where we are lost is retirement planning and this was very helpful!
Hi Mate, 470K in Austin must be incredible! If you like Texas, then you’ve got it made given the costs and no state income taxes. 470K would be like $1 million here in SF I’d have to imagine. I’d consider signing up with Personal Capital with that type of income to track your finances. It’s free and it’s helped me manage my wealth better now that I’m retired. Welcome to my site! Best, Sam
R U guys in the medical field? 470k in Austin is lot of money if you are not in medical field or have your own business.
Old school thought: Godliness with contentment is great gain.
Interesting thoughts….. Living in NY and making 430k is far from middle class for my family. After the mortgage, taxes, bills, daycare etc I am left with 1700 a month to spend as I please. No big holidays or fancy cars on my horizon.
My 2 cents.
Wow…. only $1,700/month left making $430,000 a year is pretty tight. Hopefully you’ve put away at least $50,000 in savings on top of maxing out the 401K and then have $1,700/month left? Tell me $1,700/month isn’t all that’s left for savings.
most people don’t even have $200.00 at the end of the month I consider that a blessing and its to the person choice of how they choose to live there life notice they describe raising a family. putting kids in school or college isn’t cheap, let alone raising them, to be able to stay above all that., I give them two thumbs up!!!!
I use to live in new York myself I personally know how expensive it can get, and average house is 500k to 1 million dollars to own, taxes are $10,000. minimum on houses let alone school taxes, paying taxes at your level can be as much as 55% depend how you corporate your business, also let not forget about all the employees who work for you and much much more expensive s. I’m proud of you.
Ohh.. you really need a financial adviser.
Yea, you have absolutely no clue how to handle money….what a shame.
@ Jai Catalano
After reading your, and many others, definition of rich I feel it’s gotta be based on net worth. A person or couple making 500k a year with very little savings can become lower middle class very fast with poor financial decision making, or say for example the loss of a job. If the “rich”couple haven’t saved, get caught up in lifestyle additions and are carrying debt, to me they aren’t rich at all. I net 650k after tax, have 728k liquid, own a shopping plaza and 7 rental homes, 16 businesses etc…and not to sound whiny, but I DO NOT feel rich at all. I read in one of the comments that the more you make your definition of rich changes…almost, well exactly like a sliding scale. I am what most consider to be a high net worth(6.4 million) individual, but I am a small fish compared with a few people I associate with. I live in a military town, so to 99.9 percent of those around me I am “rich”, and while I do feel upper middle class, I do not feel rich. You would never know I make and have what I do. My closest friend and mentor has a 60million net worth, and he is like me..not a “flasher”…the people that flaunt money and want people to believe they are rich usually are not. If you feel rich, well who can argue with that. If you don’t,same thing…I am self made, started my businesses with a 500 dollar loan. I feel successful but not rich….yet
So BD wolf, interesting post because I’m somewhat similar to you, maybe a little bit farther down the path but still think the same way as you sometimes. I’ve been blessed to have some very weathly mentors that have guided me and collectively the group I hang with probably averages in the $50~$70M net worth…next to them I don’t feel rich. I do live my life though 100% debt free and save a ton each year, so I do actually feel “rich”, because rich to me equates to being able to do what I want to do when I want to do it. I’m not flying private all the time, but that’s not important to me…what is important is not having the stress of life wear on you. It is probalby good not to feel rich so it keeps you grounded, some of what I stuggle with though is getting to the end and having the huge pile of money that I probably didn’t deploy to maximize life enjoyment…it is a tough balance!
How did getting a $500 loan allow you to create what you have now?
Do not agree because the more you make the more you spend
You’re forgetting something. “The more you save”. There’s no excuses for being lazy.
Regarding the 100k income level, one can contribute to a Roth IRA.
been 25 doesnt mean anything of how much you can make… my wife and i operate cellphone stores. i am 25 also.. like the person above you pay whatever you want..take whatever cash you want and use credit card on anything including vacation and everything will come from the business… so, if i made over 300+ last year which will be more than 350 this coming year i can put that i only made 80k a year and pay little tax.. still spend around 50k year coming form business expense and save 60k from check and save another 180k cash for a rainy day.. i have a morgage of 1500 but make payments of 2500, plus add a bonus extra each year… i just bought the house and plan to pay it all in 3 years
What you are suggesting is tax fraud and you could go to jail.
And telling a burglar you only have 10 dollars instead of 100 is burglarry fraud because the burglar was gonna give it for someone’s medical bill/ education/ unemployment. Why don’t you just shut up.
I don’t believe in mortgages, just another form of being a slave to the leader or borrower, you don’t own the house until you have a free and clear deed. I rather work with what I have and leverage my income first and then buy the deprecation house later, free and clear. No Head aces, its a lot easier to plan well and keep you investments growing rather just having it sit in a saving account depreciation of cause. As for deductibles under a llc or any corporation, I the I the R the S is 3 people you don’t want to play with. Keep them as your best business friend relationship always, that is a IRS tax consultant, CPA and lawyer. Don’t be the jack of all trades for you really will get screw, they can go back 7 years and pull a magic rabbits out of there black hats if you know what I mean, truly you can cross all your Ts and Dot all your I and they still can go back and say you made an error, even if they approve your deductibles. Best rules keep your I.R.S. AS CLOSER FRIENDS THEN YOUR REVENUE SHARING BUDDIES. I RATHER PAY THE 34.42% ON $340K AND DON’T GO TO PRISON “RATHER THEN TO SIT NEXT TO A GUY WHO HASN’T BATH IN 20 YEARS, WITH A MOUNTAIN FULL OF MUSCLES, NAME BUBBLE, HE LOOKING AT ME LIKE AS HIS FAVORITE PIECE OF MEAT. SAYING MEAT MEAT MEATTTTT!!!!” NO WAY!!! Learn to be honest in all your dealings and operation please.
In reality you never really own a home if you have to pay property taxes and the government can repossess your home (Florida is an exception). Don’t believe me? Stop paying your property taxes. Homes are just another asset to store wealth in. Mortgages are beneficial in avoiding the larger opportunity cost of buying a home out right and a potential hedge against short term fluctuations in housing values.
My business grossed 510k last year (I own 4 Fedex routes), after paying the other drivers I still made 340k. I’m 25 with no kids or wife, I own a 1996 Altima (First car and only car I ever bought) and live in apartment owned by my dad.
I have no expenses what so ever, not one… besides utilities.
After the accountant is done, I only paid taxes on 117k of the overall amount of 340k income.
It all varies per case, I have a business and a LLC so I can deduct practically anything from my income… is different when you have a set salary… you’re screwed.
I consider myself rich, point and simple.
With that being said, I inhered all of this from my dad.
Miguel,
I was just going to ask how you were able to get 4 FedEx routes at the age of 25 and make an operating profit of $340,000 before taxes until you said you inherited this all from your dad.
Does this mean your dad is no longer with us? Or, does he have other businesses to run?
What are your thoughts about being rich through inheritance vs. through your own work? I love understanding the psychology of wealth.
Thx, Sam
Are you looking for a girlfriend?
golddigger
Hey I rather have the gold and the right lady who want some of my gold, she going to have to dig really really deep, because its well hidden and its going to take some considerable to find. I.E. she going to have to be a treasures hunter, I will give her a map and she just going to have to figure it out herself. My treasure is in my heart and if she can find that she won me over.
So?
I know that taxes seem mean but they serve a purpose.If you make all the taxes at zero the rich will eventualy buy everything.Play monopoly and take a look.This is what has happed to the us.Take a look around every town is the same most of the restaurants are the same all franchises.The cars have shrank home prices have risen.You said it 1.1 million to live in samfansico.Im poor I live in a dubble wide trailer with a fire place cost 42 grand pluss closeing cost.It has 1650 square feet not bad compared to 1.1 million for 2200 square feet.I have 2 acres of land too.I make about 35 grand a year.I cut my own grass.do my own mantanice.If taxes on the rich were so bad how do you explain the 50s and 60s?The rich still want to buy cars from the 50s and 60s hint hint.Do you love the world you created .
It’s mostly that, the only reason why the rich are able to be rich is because there’s a system in place and whoever has the money to pay should pay, that’s why we pay an equal share. Without this system, the rich wouldn’t be rich… because there wouldn’t be a paying system where people can go to work and purchase the products that in the end make the rich, rich… as there would be no public safety.
Methinks you need to read the millionaire next door book. You’d be surprised at who ends up being rich. The vast, vast majority in the US of those that amass a million or more in net wealth grew up in families that made middle middle class income or lower and never made above middle class wages themselves.
While a person born to a family with a million or more in assets is 3x more likely to become a millionaire than one not born into assets (1:7 vs 1:21 circa late 90s), the fact is over 80% of people born into millionaire household’s don’t become millionaires themselves.
I’m a great example of class mobility in the US. My grandfather was a HS dropout and a truck driver. My father was a HS grad and was lower middle class most of my early life (he now makes middle class income and has about $300k in net worth after decades of savings in mid 60s). I ended up getting a college degree and an MBA and make 6x more than what my father’s peak salary was at the age of 35 and have a much higher net worth (my brother who is one year younger than me has 0 net worth). I started my career as a college dropout as a cashier making $7/hr retail world, moved up to corporate management on my own and paid for my own way for college/mba without any help from my folks all while working a full time career. The only help I’ve received from my parents was a $500 loan for a new car when I was 23 which i paid back 3 months later.
While class mobility has lessened in recent years, the US still has massive opportunity for those with IQs > 100, good work ethic, and spend time investing and savings. Even just putting 10% of your income aside for a 45 year career, you’ll end up with several million in assets. If you can convince the next gen to live the same way, the second gen could easily leave $10M+ in assets to the third generation – all on middle class income.
I come from a similar background. My father was a high school dropout and my mom graduated high school and was bank head bookkeeper. They sent me and my two brothers to college (state universities). They gave us all a work ethic. We all work hard every day. I became a CPA and reached the age of 70 and still work EVERY day. One of my brothers worked his butt off and got a PhD in history and became dean of the college of history at a local community college. He is a legend at that particular institution. He still works EVERY day. My youngest brother is a college graduate who is an expert in restaurant management and works EVERY day. The three of us came from nothing and now our children are moving up the ladder by working EVERY single day. Upward mobility is alive and well in the USA. It is up to each individual to make the most of the life given to him by the Creator. My children and the children of my brothers will have a leg up no doubt on some of their contemporaries but they also have the intangible of having had in house mentors to help them succeed in life. And they will be left assets to use beyond their wildest dreams. Keep the faith, upward mobility can be had by anyone willing to work hard to get it!!
Alan F.
Congratulations, I hope to do same for my children to inherit. I live very fugal I live just to be happy I don’t need expensive things I just live with things I need and just save money for their future and hope that they use it wisely!
I think that $200,000.00 after income tax and social security tax is a good figure to use to be considered “well off.” What one chooses to invest in or contribute to is their choice. The average American should not have to make up for what someone who makes 200,000. chooses to use for tax deductions. I’m not talking about businesses, I am talking about the working taxpayer, not a business. Businesses should pay taxes based on the balance of income after deductible expenses. We live on approximately $45,000.- per year. We have no health insurance except for Medicare. We do not envy those who have more than us but we do expect those who have more to pay their share.
And what is their fair share when the top 10% pay 70% of all taxes, but earn only 47% of all income?
Interesting read, and I apologize for necro posting.. BUT!
When we’re talking about the wealthy, we usually refer to the top 1% and yet for your tax figure you’ve had to bunch up the top 10%. I think you know as well as I do that’s because the majority of the tax burden is on the middle and upper middle class, those between the 90th and 99th percentile. The top 1% actually pay less taxes, percentage-wise.
sorry but $50,000 before taxes / yr is poor. period. so now above$175,000 your rich.
deleted repost 85 percent percent of americans make 100000 or less 95 percent of canadians make 100000or less stop feeding the innocent lies
ty for deletein the truth samuri
what are you people doing to make 150 200 grand a year impoting exporting rails hmmmm…?
100000 or less
woww most of you act like money is falling from the sky please explain to me how the fuck making 200000 grand a year is middle class both in canada and the usa sure the cost of living eats up alot of income 85 percent of the american population makes 100000 or less thats 95 percent in canada gross income the top 1 percent control about 43 percent of financial wealth in the us lets be real people anything over 150000 ur balling compared to ur country
Angry much?
Obama and Romney say $250,000 and under is middle class, so who are we to argue?
Money is raining from the sky. Look at Apple’s earnings and the number of people spending $500-$1000 for an iphone5 they don’t need.
OK so here I am and know what it is to work 2-3 jobs at a time. Have never been wealthy, in fact my best years I got 16,000 and that was working 3 Jobs. In all my years of working, SO FAR I have yet to see a poor or real middle income person Employ anyone. Was working at a Machine shop, they got their taxes raised again, besides all the other increases to take in consideration for expense, I got my hours cut and another one also. SO now why do we want to increase the taxes on the rich (225,000 or more) for? Am lost with the question, Someone show me the math, Poor people Do not create or maintain employees….Rich people do! AND they need some sort of incentive!!
Abe, great perspective given your income.
I’ve never met a poor person employ anybody either.
But, it’s easier to vote on raising taxes on others so we can benefit rather than work harder ourselves! Go USA!
Abe the hard work you did working three jobs is the equivalent of 1/15 of the hard work that a rich person is doing. That means you need to work 15 years to be worth what this one person is able to do. When a CEO cuts himself a check for 10,000,000 dollars after working for two years for a company and the company loses value during their term imagine how long it would take you to make that much money. 500 years at 20,000 a year. I definitely need to educate myself through this website about taxes but thinking about compensation like that for a person who seemingly works hard vs. a higher up can be difficult to swallow.
what i do is pay every expense with my company so i spend 50k a year in food and gas alone.. through the company.. in my area you can be rich with 250k.. of course saving more thank 100k a year.. right now i am saving around 180K.. my car is paid and only owe 180k for the morgage
My wife and I have a combined gross of ~$184K (net ~$135K) and I have to say that I feel anything but rich. I live just outside of Cleveland Ohio, and we are likely in the top 2-3% of households in Northeast Ohio in terms of income, but I feel like the government (at all levels) takes from me far in excess of the value that it provides. The effective tax rate for my household is around 28% factoring in all levels of government.
I am fed up with people telling me I’m rich… I am not rich!
That’s a good income for Ohio Michael! That’s like $1 million here in San Francisco!
I work in IT (contracting as a software engineer which leads to better hourly rates than I could achieve as a salaried worker) and my wife is a bench scientist (medical testing). We are both highly educated (masters plus) and we have both been high achievers since our school days.
I don’t know if it would quite equate out to a million in SF, but it is rather comfortable. I’d like to think that though we have made both good and bad decisions that we’re on a rather solid path. For example, I purchased a home a few years back when I was single, and making less, that was only 2.25X my gross rather than the nearly 6X the bank said I could “afford” but on the flip side of that coin we managed to accumulate nearly $100K in student loan debt between the two of us. I’m not super worried since most of the student loan debt is at bargain basement rates right now thanks to Mr. Bernanke, and I’m in no hurry to repay loans that have negative “inflation-adjusted” interest rates.
Last time I did the calculations we’ve got a savings rate of about 35% of net across all of the vehicles available to us. We’re a bit behind the guidelines for savings based on our ages (I turn 30 in 5 days, and my wife is about 6 months younger than I), but I blame that on a later start due to graduate school. Either way, I’m working on a solid dividend performers portfolio that’s already replacing around 8% of our yearly expenses, and compounding rather quickly due to reinvested dividends and monthly contributions.
Modern finance is truly a beautiful thing if you’re willing to devote a little bit of brain power to crack open Excel and run the numbers.
I think you don’t feel rich b/c you are only 29 years old. Give yourself a full 10 years of working, saving, and investing and I’m sure you will start feeling very rich, especially if you stay in your state!
According to 185k is about 300k in San Fran
You’re complaining because you don’t think you’re rich, but people keep telling you that you are? Wow, that is a sad story. I would have the blues too. It’s almost as bad as having chapped lips!
Wow. Your article, although interesting, feels depressing and out of touch.
$350,000 is not rich? How far does the middle class stretch??
$200,000 per person (I’m not talking per household) is at the very least upper middle class.
As far as I am concerned, anyone making $200,000 or more is rich, unless they have a money management problem.
$350,000 is upper middle class in cities like SF, NYC, Paris, London, Hong Kong. In non international cities, I would say $350,000 is rich.
I don’t know where you got this idea, but I’m from Paris and I can tell you that 350k is considered as rich there…
This is the only article that got it right. One thing that warps everything is have 3 kids and sending them all to private school. Ours are still little and our bill is $36,000.
In 3 years it will be $45,000 and after that $50,000-$60,000.
And I’m thinking of going for number 4. And we live in one of the big, pricey cities you mentioned.
At $250,000 I DO feel rich though. What I mean by that is that I am able to save a significant amount every month without living frugally. I don’t waste money, but I do have a full time housekeeper, nice cars, and give $25,000 a year in charity etc.
Exactly!!! I was just trying to make this same point, but think maybe it was censored. If you’re not rich with $300k anywhere, then you definitely either have money managing issues, or you’re just a greedy, never satisfied person with distorted priorities. I’m not saying this, because I’m poor and jealous. I’m pretty well off and live in Los Angeles and happens to be in touch with reality.
@Fred: Very true. $350 is rich everywhere. Paris, London, Copenhagen, Los Angeles etc etc and I have lived most these places. Who ever says otherwise, are the ones who’s out of touch and I pity those who do not see and enjoy what they have, but only strive to get more!
The wife and I pull in a little over $300k/yr and with taxes (NY residents BTW) and child support, gas, mortgage, camps, piano lessons, lacrosse, soccer, food….I am just scrapeing by. We live in a modest ranch house have 2 crappy cars and play muni golf. We dont go to fancy restaurants or live an extravagant lifestyle. On what planet am I considered wealthy? And they want to raise my taxes? Are they @#$# nuts?
Let’s see child support, camps, piano lessons, lacrosse, soccer, etc. You are far better off than the ave NYer or most people anywhere. Many people would love to have a portion of what you have. Most people don’t live that well. So yes you are rich compared to the rest. I would be willing to bet that your modest ranch probably goes for 300k and your two crappy cars are between 20-30k when bought. About 80% of us would love to suffer like you do.
My husband and I made a combined income of $77,000 last year we have cut corners on everything we live in a tiny tiny home 350sqft. We use free firewood in winter we moved to the back areas of east tn to afford to keep living we eat not more than 3ounces of meat three times per week and beans and rice the rest of the week. We have cut healthcare and everything possible to cut last year we came out even and we can not seem to find one dollar to save. We never leave home we work from home so transportation cost is next to nothing. We really have cut every corner we can so in my humble opinion this article is on the money about it depends on where you live how much you earn but the numbers are all off because this past year groceries alone ran us almost $10K and we do not have special diets or anything and we do not buy alcohol or anything expensive all beans and rice so short of going hungry and never leaving home and only buying what you truly need in a cheap are cost $77K for two people then to me it takes at least $150K to be happy and able to save a bit for retirement and have some for travel and some to have folks over for a meal etc… None of which we have been able to do. Not certain where the numbers above come from but life is expensive period.
i don’t understand your predicament being the way it is in Tennessee.. i just got out of college and i can live off of 200$ of groceries a month and i live in Charleston SC.. my friend lives with her bf in outside of chapel hill and make way less than y’all do… somethings wrong there.
Are you serious 10k in groceries? I live in Denver and support 3 people and we spend maybe 400 tops per month on food. We eat good meals all the time on that budget. Where are you shopping????
400 per month is low for 2 people… you guys must not eat much.
well… ugh… i feel sick. It’s time you clows to a walk on “reality” street. It’s clear that most of you have never been poor. It takes almost nothing to survive.
Comparing your “money” to the country’s averages? Compare it to the world. Think, india, china and south america for instance, forget about africa because you already have forgotten about it.
You eat once a day? Clean water? a roof over your head? You’re rich. FU.
Comrade. Please share with us where your anger comes from. Thanks
please advise
stop patronize china for god sakes..geez
china is richer than you think ,in fact, in cities like wen zhou ,or any one that near sea or port,
ppl makes more than 30k USD on average and living cost is much much lower.
so stop worrying about us and be more concerned about your government with their debt.(number will stun you,hahaha) .this is also to sam.
my entirely earning are from foreign so i am not quiet familiar with your tax system even though i live here. i been follow this blog for a fairly long time and i notice a huge lot of saving that sam promoted is depend on this 401k.is that like pension?
anyway i have read an article on forbes or somewhere else that US government are missing 20 trillions in their pension and that problem is gonna blast soon.but worst of worst is this one interesting fact, that your government ,who is in debt of 547 trillions ,has a tax earning that can’t even pay off the interests that those huge debt generates.
thats hilarious,right? let’s think of this goverment as a person.so it will be like this.
that he borrowed say 100k from the bank to buy a car with no down payment. he plans to pay it off in next five years.lets consume the interests rate is mere 2 percent yearly ,so roughly he ought to pay the bank interests for about 2k every year for the next five years.and now guess what? he founds out that after all the spending he can’t even pay off the 2k due every year. not to mention the 100k itself.
interesting right? because in the scenario china is the bank. you americans really need to work on your illusions and grow some brian.not to listen to the first thing your media and government promoted is the first step to facing the reality.
but really ,this whole you own us thing is less of our concern as we don’t need the money urgently anyway. in the economic crysis china has huge shares of all the investment bank that survived in united states and our government is nice enough not to pulled out their investment.and if we did, there will probably be no wall street now.
so really ,think about this ,what if when you are old ,you thought you have everything planed only to founds out that your government has no money to pay off your pension?
and yea, definitely not vote for obama. he taxed your butt off and still the government is in new debt? with all the taxes obama s getting, the chinese government can probably build ark that can survives 2012 for everybody on the earth and still have plenty left.
Yea, but we bail out entire countries, die for other countries, hunt terrorist for the worlds protection, search for missing people and planes, buy Chinese crap for the Chinese people, give the Chinese and multiple other countries our jobs. Feed the hungry all over the world, actually we’d rather take more care of other countries than the our own. Teach & train other countries. So guess what – I don’t care whose money it is. It’s not lining my pockets in any way shape or form.
Seriously…..your comments are flat out insulting ! You have ZERO IDEA what people have done in their life to end up where they are after lots of years of busting ass, saving pennies – then dollars, scraping buy, working 80-100 hours a week, losing jobs, being laid off with a newborn baby, etc. Yes…..now ( Im 60 ) ive got a really nice nest egg saved and have no debt that will allow my wife and I to retire next year. Ive worked ETHICALLY for every nickel I have made and saved and for you to say FU and act like we are a bunch of criminals…..your a total ignorant dick. Have a great day !
@paul
I must agree Paul. I am a mother of two living on 22k a year, it is about 18k after taxes… Meaning I have about 1500 a month to pay all my bills and support my 4 year old and 5 year old. I live in pa. I have a garden to supplement my groceries, I am not not complaining but am saying that the only way I am getting through is by instinct, self sustainability. When it gets over whelming I just think it could be worse. I get quite upset when this rich topic comes up, because I feel if you can cover your basic needs, you are good, if you can afford multiple cars and vacations in exotic places, multiple homes, etc… You need to be so grateful, you are rich. I know first hand life can be gone in a second, the money is worth nothing to you then. Live a rich life on what you have. Sorry to carry on I hope I have contributed something to the discussion. I guess the point is, it really is all relative.
i think you are all on drugs and a bunch of cry baby’s. only 17% of this country make over 100 k.
they say 52k is the medium income but this figure is distorted due to the outrageous amount of money the 17% make. in this country 58% make less than 27k and 17% make less than 57k. that equals 75% of this country under 57k. fs states that someone making 50k could save 22k. i strongly disagree. i make 50k and 12%goes to my 401k, 4%goes to savings. that leaves a whopping 2000 per month take home. the total of just my rent and utilities is 1400 a month. this leaves 600 to pay for any debt inured medical food gas. that’s is 150 a week to live on.
you people should feel fortunate you are in the upper income level. i know people that have 1-3 children making 25k per year working 2 jobs about 50+hours per week. how do you suppose they survive after all their expense’s. you people need to stop wining.
What is your effective tax rate?
Come on Samurai. What is your effective tax rate????
If one pays more taxes, it’s because one makes more money and brings more money home! Tax rates are marginal!
Over 30% including state taxes.
And yours?
She’s right. We have much more expendable income. My taxes (AMT, property, state) eat a huge chunk of our income, but I’d rather be on this side of the fence, don’t you agree?
BTW, where did you get your degree?
YOUR OUT TO LUNCH. YOU YOURSELF DESERVE A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE AND YOU NEED TO DESIRE IT, AND ALSO FEEL THAT YOU TRULY DESERVE IT, AND YOU HAVE TO OPEN UP YOUR MIND TO TAKING BETTER CARE OF YOURSELF, EVEN IF YOU NEVER GET THERE 100%
I know! I definitely agree with the president that 200,000 is rich, just look at all those people making so much less per year. People need to stop whining about taxes. You make more, you can afford to contribute more, and just be thankful that you are in that situation.
Thankful to whom and for what? Thankful to God perhaps, for the desire and ability. Other than that, there is none to thank but oneself. Hard work and sacrifice are required to be successful. Whining? Seriously? How about a flat tax? The rich will still pay more and I will definitely stop ‘whining’ about taxes.
A flat tax hurts the poor more by taking a larger % out of their pay. But then again, people like you don’t care about the poor. That’s obvious.
Seriously, what do you think a flat tax is?
“l. i know people that have 1-3 children making 25k per year working 2 jobs about 50+hours per week. how do you suppose they survive after all their expense’s” It’s called self responsibility. Don’t have kids if you can’t afford them. Go to college, get a job, save money, and move up the ladder until you can afford to support a family. Then have kids. Also when you are dedicating your time to work and education, you would achieve more. It’s really just common sense. How do you think the upper middle class is able to make so much money?
But what if you are really horny and can’t help yourself? Shouldn’t those with lots of children’s be supported by those with less children or no children’s in America?
Afterall, the government provides a $1,000 child tax credit for income earners below $65,000 or so. Why do you think that is?
Are you psycho! People choose to not have children because they do not want to pay for them. I for one hate that I pay fees and taxes for schools that even if I had children they would not step foot into. Horny or not get clipped, take the pill, and choose partners that want the same things as yourself. Let people take care of themselves, maybe, they would learn to get off the coach and do something productive or maybe, they would kindly reduce our population. Anyone notice that what we pay to keep people that don’t earn enough money could pay off our nations debt. Maybe, there are just to many people.
Any solutions you want to suggest comrade?
We voted big government in, so why complain?
The stock market and real estate market are on fire. People are getting rich!
Although I agree that you should plan to have children when your situation is ‘good,’ what if that never happens? To say the poor should not reproduce has a name – Eugenics. Besides, not all of us can be at the top, or even the upper 50%, can we? It’s impossible.
Oh jeez – He wasn’t referring anything remotely like eugenics. To say he was is pretty extreme.
“Good” is relative and will be different for everyone. There are a lot of people that aren’t ready for children, both emotionally OR financially ….their poor situation is exacerbated by the emotional and financial expense of raising a child and they become a strain not only on themselves, but the rest of the country.
“Good” does not have to mean $100k salaries and white picket fences. A couple with very little expenses, debt, are emotionally ready, and that only make $20k a year can definitely be in a good situation to have children – even though they are below the poverty line. While another couple making a $150k salary with a high debt to income ratio, and an emotionally unstable environment might not be ready and therefore should think about possibly waiting until they are in a better position to bring a new person into the world. Obviously you are your partner are the only one’s able to decide when to have children, and that will vary greatly from couple to couple depending on the situation.
And nobody has the right to decide if another can have children or not – but people that have children (that aren’t ready), complain they can’t get ahead in life, then turn around and blame “the government” or another unrelated entity on their poor financial situation, all while collecting government checks month after month can put enormous strain on the economy and give welfare programs a bad reputation. By simply waiting until their financial situation improved, they could have saved themselves and governmental welfare programs a lot of money and headache.
And here I was getting excited over my husband and I combined making over $100,000 a year LoL..and we are not even out of college yet.i feel screwed lol. Being a clinical child and adolescent psychologist (average $70000 a year) and husband civil engineering ($100,000 a year) we will obviously not make enough..yikes! Any suggestions on how to make more off what we earn? As you can see I am money dumb lol. by the way we live in Tulsa, Ok.
No, you’re fine. You’re really fine. And you’re not even out of college?
You’ll receive raises, do not fear.
Finally – someone who got it right! There are so many articles out there trying to define “rich” and I have to constantly say that my annual HH income of $200k is certainly not “rich” even if I live in the state free tax of Texas. No debt and live in a modest 3700 sq ft home, by Texas standards that’s an average size home. Spouse and I left California for a better cost of living.
No kids, although we wanted some. It just hasnt happened for us yet. We contribute the max to 401k and still qualify to contribute to Roth IRAs and we max out our pre-tax FSA accounts as well so that strips us down a quick $54,000. We invest about $10,000 on top of that every year and the rest goes to daily living expenses. Surely we live well but we have to keep working to keep building that retirement account. Plus if that family ever happens for us, we’ll need a nice cushion of savings because I’m going to take a few years off. If it doesn’t happen, then I’ll start looking for a different job that is something “fun” instead of staying on the hamster wheel making the big bucks. Money isn’t everything although it is sure nice to not worry about who’s making the mortgage and electric bill payment!
Just curious? How did you acquire your wealth?
Hello D,
Spouse and I work corporate jobs. I had corporate mentors and got my undergrad and MBA on full scholarship. It helps to not start out in debt to begin with. I started my career in sales, quickly climbing to top sales person within a year. Commissions were huge and that opened doors to being on the fast track at my Fortune 10 corporation that I worked for. Advancement came quickly into management then more senior management positions. Not a lot of people are resilient to moving across the nation every few years but we did. We moved for strategic promotions with relocation packages – saving all along the way. Having a supportive spouse who is on the same page with life, career and financial goals is key. That and having great mentors who will champion your career.
Jean, I can’t believe nobody called you out (on a financial website) when you said you live in a modest 3700 SF home which is just average in Texas??? Maybe if you have 4 kids and are in the “rich” category but you say it’s just your husband and you and you make $200K/year? I also live in Texas, in a 2000 SF home, just my wife and I, no kids, no debt and we make more than you and save much more than you.
My first rule of financial well being is to reduce your biggest expenses first, which is usually your House. In Texas we dont’ have state income tax, which you mention, however the state receives the same amount of taxes as every other state they just get it through different methods. Property Tax in texas is ridiculously high and is based on the appraised value of your home. The bigger the home, the higher the appraisal. Even if you’ve paid off the mortgage the operating expense of a 3700 SF home is going to be much higher than a smaller home. Americans believe they need a big home and new cars but reality is those things are a financial ball and chain.
Hmmm, 3,700 sqft SFH is pretty damn huge for only two people now that you mention it. I feel like I’ve got too much house with 2,000 sqft here in SF.
If you are making 200k, that puts you in the top 5%. Statistically you are not middle class (remember the bell curve?). If you are investing 25% of your income, you are accumulating wealth, not spending it.
It’s all about what you want out of life. My elderly in-laws are millionaires who can live off of their pensions & social security alone, but they cannot stomach spending anything more. Moderation.
Hey man good article.
I made just enough to be considered rich on your list,good thing is that i do not have to pay that much tax,since tax rate in hong kong for me is roughly overall 15%.
Just found out your blog and am fully intrigued.will follow.
I THOUGHT I WAS MIDDLE CLASS BUT I JUST FOUND OUT I WAS POOR LOLLOL
It’s all good Jenn! The great thing if you are young is that you can always find a way to get richer if you wish! And if you are happy with your current income, then does it really matter if you are poor?
Sam. Can you explain AMT tax to me. I make a substantial amount of money, more the 500k but i ultimately would like to parlay that money into investing into real estate development and some other investments and not live the 9-5 life in the next 3-5 years. How will AMT taxes come into play if i have a lot of itemized deductions in the future…I cant seem to wrap my head around this tax and how it works. Thanks man
BK
It’s a tough one that only after you input the figures through a tax software like H&R Block Online
” target=”_blank”>H&R Block, will it spit out a number. Essentially, tax deductions get phased out over time. https://www.financialsamurai.com/mortgage-interest-deduction-limit-and-income-phaseout/
The solution I’ve come up with is to have an AGI of about $250,000 to get maximum deductions. But that takes a lot of change.
Look at the AMT worksheet the IRS provides. Mortgage interest and charitable donations are examples of deductions that are not subject to AMT, while property taxes are. Meaning that they can be added back into your income and taxed! If you can, maximize charitable donations, make an improvement on your home… But choose an area to live where property taxes are lower. Of course there are a few more variables, but I can’t remember offhand.
I think your views a little skewed. To you $50,000 for a single person is the starting point for lower middle class. And those people have 401Ks etc…So after all the savvy savings, a mere $2000 a month is enough for a frugal lifestyle. Well…think on this: I was raised in a family of 5 to immigrant parents making $38,000 annually TOGETHER. We didn’t have 401ks, IRAs, bonds, etc…And we didn’t live a frugal lifestyle. We lived within our means and managed to save for rainy days. Even with that income, my parents manged to take us on vacations. Maybe we didn’t go to Disney world or go on cruises once a year but we had adventures together. And they put 3 of their kids through college. So, you saying that $50K for a single person is lower middle class to me sounds as if you’re spoiled and privileged. You want to live the life of a luxury that you cannot afford and think that’s the only way to live. Anything beneath it is a frugal lifestyle. We didn’t have a lot of money to burn but we weren’t dirt poor. We learned to prioritize and live on a budget. So a single person making $50K a year compared to us should be able to accomplish a lot more than just a frugal lifestyle.
Perhaps $50,000 now isn’t worth the same as it was when you were growing up 20+ years ago??
Perhaps, FS, you’re out of touch with most of America. The median household (not personal) income is right about $50k. That means more than half of American families are poor by your definition of what is rich. Do we really want to live in a country where so many people are poor? Do we really want to live in a country where so many entitled people, who are in the top 2% of all income earners, do not feel “rich”?
Yes, FS, you’re one of the entitled, and so are many of your commenters. You load up your “expenses” with personal savings, which you get to keep. Other people here say they have to pay for private school because public schools are not good enough for their special snowflakes.
How about working to make public schools better? Oh no, that would take realistic tax rates.
How about social programs so people in our country don’t go to be hungry? Oh no, that would take realistic tax rates.
How about paying for all of the programs that we use instead of putting it on the national credit card (public debt)? Instead of making our kids pay for our mistakes? Oh no, that would take realistic tax rates.
What you wrote here makes me sick. You want what this country offers you, but whine when it comes time to pay the bills. I’ll bet you call yourself a patriot, but you’re probably not a vet like me. Refusing to pay for what you say you’re “entitled” to is unpatriotic as well as pathetic.
Just to avoid the usual BS, I grew up lower middle class or even poor. I went to public schools. I now have several graduate degrees. I have a side business as well as a professional job. My household’s income puts us in the top 5%. Our net worth puts us in the top 3% because we save money instead of living in a McMansion and buying every piece of electronic garbage out there.
I’m pretty sure I’ve paid more taxes and donated way more in charity to you. Why the attack? I don’t attack you for not helping out our countrymen as much.
I’m happy you are paying taxes to support others who are not. It’s my turn to take a break, so thanks for your contribution!
I think you’ll enjoy this post https://www.financialsamurai.com/2012/08/02/going-john-galt-protest-government-waste/
Jerry had some weird point of view.
Charity and earring is not opposed to each other.
When I was 16,made first 10K,I donated all of them to red cross and have worked there part time for free till now.that does’t stop me from building my own business and living relatively large.
To some degree I agree with you but we’ve increased per capita spending astronomically in the last 50 years and have had no results. I don’t think spending is the issue when it comes to education. The cost of public schools is already almost as expensive as private schools in most states.
Why do you have someone making $50,000 putting nearly half of their gross income into a 401k and such, but someone making TWICE that, putting $5,000 *less?* That doesn’t make any sense.
So much ignorance here. The author, and most of you, don’t realize that “rich” is about assets – not income.
If I inherit $50 million, don’t invest it (and have no income), I am not rich???
If I make $400K but owe $7 million, I am rich? Nope.
Stupid confusion displayed here.
The post isn’t entitled “What Asset Level Is Considered Rich”. Of course $50 million is rich. That’s for stating the obvious.
I live in Los Angeles, and I made about $200k last year from my job, plus another $24k from rental income. But I’m losing about $1,500 per month from the rental per month, and I am under about $200k for both my primary and investment property. So I definitely don’t feel rich and would be extremely ticked off if I get taxed any more! Also, with my income level, I can’t even take any passive losses on my investment property.
Not being able to take passive losses on your investment property is where things are a bitch. I think the income threshold is around $150,000 AGI right? Seems so arbitrary and unfair.
Is this based on Household income or personal income?
Thanks
Where you’re located definitely need to be factored in to who is considered “rich.” Cost of living makes quite a difference. What is considered “wealthy?”
needs*
I think you mean your mortgage would be $6,000 a month, not $60,000 a month on a million dollar home.
Thanks for the catch! I mean $60,000 a year actually for a PMI loan. $5,000 a month including $1,800 or so in principal pay down.
While the idea of being ‘rich’ is a simple one, it is actually a concept with many different ideas and viewpoints. Depending on your income level your idea of ‘rich’ might be different. The more income you currently have, the more additional income it will take to consider yourself ‘rich’.
Right! Just like the older you get, your definition of “old” keep getting higher and higher!!
Average income in the U.S. is ~ $50,000 which is a “middle-class” income in most places.
$200,000-250,000 is considered VERY WEALTHY in the vast majority of the United States.
$200K -$250K might not be all that much if you blow it all living in EXTREMELY high cost of living cities such as San Fan, NY City, etc but general speaking $200-250K is a hell of a lot of money NOT just “middle-class”. Who says you have to have 4 kids, pay 40K+ for their college, save $$$ and so on??? Trying to somehow justify how 200K isn’t a shit-ton of money? That’s not fooling anybody.
100K is considered “upper middle-class” in most areas of the United States. Nobody said you have to live in the most expensive cities (NY, San Fran,etc) in the U.S. and save 1/2 your income, pay $40K for college, etc.
500K and beyond is just stupid wealthy compares to the average American. Even 100K rates in the upper 15-20% of income earners.
Some folks are apparently living in a fairy tale World.
How easy/commonplace is it to find a $250,000 income in a low cost area?
Thx
I give some, I spend some and I save some. I give a tithe and then spend a tenth in wild and complete abandonment, as long as it’s in budget. Per investing, I am a tad unique, with RMD from an inheritance, I am near the $5K max per year for tax advantage accounts (also I’m overweight in stocks) so investing is in bonds/bond funds (purpose of the bond fund is to save up to have enough for a lot of 5 [munis]). So the article does not quite fit my situation, for regardless of size it goes toward my long term rebalancing act.
Interesting break down. In Canada our taxes are even higher. Youch.
I think being rich all depends on where you live, the cost of living, and what you have in your life to support. I also think being rich is a perspective. You can own a small house in a small neighbourhood and have no debt and be rich but people wouldn’t necessarily think you are.
Great post! It’s shocking when you see the number laid out that way. I spend some time on this subject as well as I believe high income earners are also highly susceptable to bad decisions. Notably lifestyle creep.
I love the Jon Kabat-Zinn reference. I think what is amazing about income, wealth and this numbers game in general is that it is whatever you want it to be and the potential to reach a level of wealth that at one point seemed impossible becomes entirely possible! Will you soon see me out of debt and on the road to building income and capital? Yes, because I’m totally focused on it!
It’s interesting how “rich” is such a relative term. For someone like yourself who lives in a wealthy area and hangs out with some pretty “well-to-do” folks, half a million a year in income seems about right. For myself, living in rural Canada, I would consider a family income of 250K to be “rich.” Yet I recognize that is really isn’t “rich” in terms of standard of living for someone living where you are. So aren’t both of us right? This is why I prefer consumer taxes to income taxes. The more you spend the more you owe, it rewards people who are focused on building wealth.
I guess we can both be right, however when you are making 250K and supporting a family, I highly doubt you will feel rich. 40% tax in Canada at the level right?
Where I live in, $350,000 is enough for being rich. Important factor is the calculation is pro big city dwellers. If we consider rest of the population who live in much cheaper places, its equivalent to tax opportunity loss for the state.
Shouldn’t there be a mathematical formula to determine your tax rate? Rather than income being the only criteria..oh yeah its called income tax!
SB, where do you live again?
Good post.
I think it’s good you’ve clarified the two aspects of monetary wealth – income and capital.
Just because you make good money, doesn’t mean you are rich.
I also agree with your income levels. Anyone making $500K+ should be “rolling in it”. They could be rolling in something else, but mostly likely that income should provide a very, very fine standard of living! :)
Without making tons of money myself, I’ll have to go the capital route – smart investing. Hopefully every month and year along, I’m getting there.
Cheers Sam!
Mark
John, if you are happy with where you live (where is this?), then more power to you. Living in a nice place with good weather and food is unfortunately one of my weaknesses. Hence, I’ve gotta pay up!
Yum, that sounds good! :)
Why are we dividing people into classes, Sam? If the idea of a tax is unjust, then it must be unjust period, not simply unjust because we happen to be in whatever bucket the government has placed us into. Doesn’t this attitude of placing people into categories just divide us more?
I believe that we are all rich, relatively speaking, and we are all blessed to be alive today. I don’t make a six figure salary, and yes, sometimes I do get envious — I am human, after all. However, the best way for me to benefit is to turn this envy toward making my own circumstances better, and in doing so, I can add back more value into the world.
Because the term “rich” is attempted to be defined by my post.
It’s not bad to be lower middle class just like it’s not bad being rich.
It’s only bad when you are lower middle class and act rich and blow yourself up. We have to spend accordingly.
I really like the idea of finding a mentor, but getting the right one is easier said than done. I’ve had “part-time mentors” at various points in my life for various things, but most were very specialized in certain aspects of life. There are definitely avenues of life right now where I could use a good sounding board. On the flip side, I love taking the opportunity to help out others and be a mentor the rare times it comes up.
So Sam, maybe you should write a post about how to find a mentor!!!
Ok, sounds good! Having a powerful ally is really fantastic for one’s everything!
Rich is a function of location, age, income, and assets. To try and define rich by any single variable ignores other important features.
You could have a paid for residence, have a massive portfolio with conservative investments and be living outside of Southern California or the Eastern Seaboard with an income of “only” $100k and not be rich, but live in either of those areas and have no assets, a massive mortgage, and make $250k a year and be rich.
Fact of the matter is that the current tax structure isn’t designed to handle such massive discrepancies in cost-of-living from location to location. The government recognizes the difference when it comes to employee compensation, by don’t they recognize it with respect to the income tax.
If you are going to use income to define rich, it should be based on a comparison with the local median income for the surrounding area. If you are at 3 or 4 times the median income for an area (For example: metropolitan area if urban, county if rural) then it is safe to say that you are rich (at least relative to where you live) [A better measure might be 2 standard deviations above the median]
You & I seem to be very similar in our definitions of rich.
Thanks to my stupid decisions (& our bankruptcy) I feel like I’m just now starting the first leg of a race that was started 15 years ago. Almost like we were frozen in time for a long period of time. I’m WAY behind where I should be at this point for retirement savings. The only way to ‘fix’ that is to find a way to increase our income to try to make up for lost time.
All actions have consequences.
There’s so much money out there for the taking, anything is possible! Good luck!
I tried before… for some reason, it doesn’t stick. And, it doesn’t stick in my mind, so I guess not!
Growing up in a lower middle class family, I think I have a whole different perspective on what it means to be rich. I have 3 brothers and 1 sister (5 of us total) and I don’t think my parents ever made more than $100,000 a year. Most of the time it was $60,000 or $70,000. Now that my wife and I make more than that with no kids, we feel extremely wealthy. I can’t even imagine making $350,000 per year. If we kept our lifestyle the same, we could invest $300k per year and retire in 5 years…. crazy.
And the kick in the nuts is, you can’t even invest 300K per year for 5 years b/c after taxes, you only have about $245,000 and still need to eat and live!
I really believe that it is a bad idea to create class war by targeting certain income level for the tax hike. Instead, best way to mobilize economy and to create wealth is to cut taxes. President Regan did that in early 80’s and the time is ripe now for the new leader to so.
Yes he did – cut taxes – but ALSO – cut deductions, loopholes, credits, etc.
I would love to see us go back to something similar to what the tax reform act of 1986 created. Chances of that happening anytime soon – Slim to None!!! Unfortunately.
Which country dO you live in mate? I’ll check out your blog now, thx.
Ah yes, the land of 40% taxes and cheaper health care for all.
I think i’d stop at 100,000 if I lived in Canada and relax!
I think I agree with your assessments; often times people consider something like 200K “rich” but that’s not, especially for someone without much saved. I think when you’re hitting 400-500K and more, that’s outside the range of even doctors, lawyers, etc and usually into execs and entrepreneurs – long-term wealth.
Love this post and the debate it sparked.
My husband and I are considered by the government to be in the top 1.5% of wealthiest Americans… but we live in Southern California!! How far our salaries go out here cannot even compare to other parts of the country.
I do agree that “rich” is more about lifestyle than income, although I believe actual “wealth” requires a substantial capital base.
I’m in the camp that rich is a lifestyle, not a paycheck. It does help to have a big income to live a rich lifestyle, but it is possible to do amazing things on $40k or $50k per year depending on your goals, dreams, and circumstances.
What type of amazing things can you do on 40-50k a year and how much is one able to save?
I think the part where you mention having a capital base is probably the best definition of rich in there. Income can change, whether you decide to stop working or life decides for you. Your income certainly influences capital, but as we know, lifestyles, friends, and co-workers have expectations. If you make 500k and only set aside 10k a year in savings are you rich? I don’t think so. Grant following Sam’s strategy will help you put more away, but unless you really have something to fall back on, income is transitory, wealth lasts.
I do believe if you are making 500k and only saving 10k you are rich bc spending 490k on life is big balling!
Even after reading this post, I still think that $200k is rich. I base this on the fact the making 200k+ puts you in the top 1.5% of income earners (according to wikipedia). Of course, I guess I’m still thinking about it as someone who lives in a low cost-of-living area. I don’t make anywhere NEAR 200k but yet I still feel rich in that I have enough money for everything I need and then some.
If you never lived in NYC (or similarly expensive local) you just won’t get it. My wife and I have a combined gross income over $200k. We live in a modest 1 bedroom apartment and drive an 8 year old car. Our commute to the office on average takes one hour, each way. We don’t have children and thus are saving quite a bit each month, but as we look to buy a home to raise a family, we are finding out that our income doesn’t take us very far. Homes that are just 10 minutes closer to Manhattan can cost anywhere from $600k to well over 1 million. Two bedroom apartments as large as our 1 bedroom start at 1 million. It’s pretty crazy. $200k in NYC is most certainly middle class – an average 3 bedroom home in the suburbs, a typical long commute to the office, kids in public schools with one or two vacations per year – a decent lifestyle, but certainly not rich.
That is crazy that a 1 bedroom apartment STARTS at 1 million… ugh. How much are you guys saving a year if you don’t mind me asking?
Yeah, crazy right. I was speaking about a nice 1 bedrooms in Manhattan. There are small 1 bedrooms avail for less. Outside of Manhattan, prices drop considerably, but are still expensive compared to the rest of the country. We’re currently saving about half of what we net each month (non retirement).
I think this is the best case for calling a $350,000 income “upper middle class” and not “rich” that I have ever seen! Seems hard to believe when you say it, but with your analysis only based on expensive cities, it’s easier to see what you’re saying.
I still think it’s hard to define “rich” based on income. It’s really about your net worth and not what you make, but there’s no way that makes sense to tax people based on what they’re worth.
Thanks Jeff. I encourage everyone to do the math and calculate what their after tax income is, rather than speculating what it is.
And really, is it so bad to be “upper middle class”?
Not at all in my opinion!
Based upon what you have written above I would be upper middle class – however, I grew up pretty poor – thus I feel rich.
I earn more and have saved more than I ever in my wildest dreams imagined.
I grew up in a family of nine children and my father died when I was 4 months old at 35 years of age. We grew up on social security. Did I ever go to bed hungry – no. However, did I get an allowance or even 1/4 of the spending money other people got to go to the store – also no. We grew up with a black and white television and of course did not have cable.
I have great memories of my childhood and now I really appreciate every dollar I earn save, invest, and/or spend.
I’m unbelievable happy being upper middle class!!!!!!!!
Huge difference between being monetarily wealthy, and *feeling* wealthy. Obviously you’re talking about monetary wealth, but take a look at this comment stream of New Yorkers making $700K+ and feel “poor”. It’s insane.
Here in Hawaii, we need about $50K year to send our kids to private school (public schools here are known for being not so great), plus if we ever wanted to buy a house with 3 bedrooms and a yard we’d be shelling out close to $700K. That would be another $4000+ mortgage and property taxes a month – so just for those two expenses that’s over $8K/month already. Ouch!
We make $32K/year. I think we’ve got a long way to go…lol.
Kris, so what is rich in Hawaii for a family of two in your opinion?
Taxes kill the New Yorkers.
Nice and relevant post Sam. I put emphasis on another financial aspect besides income. It’s the savings.. To me savings is the ultimate income one can have. It does not matter if you earn $200 or close to it.. if you cannot save enough bucks, you will start at the beginning next month. So, savings is must.. nice post..
Which begs the question: Why don’t more people save more money?
A lot of folks on my recommended savings post say they felt like they got their guts kicked bc they were light compared to the chart.
Scientific research has identified the number somewhere around $70K-$80K in annual income, in order to “feel rich.” As many have pointed out, however, that is practically poverty level in some parts of the country in the sense of “real life”, especially if a family is living on that income. But, from a quality of life standpoint, research shows that is the tipping point between being very financially stressed, and having more flexibility to not worry about every dime is within that range. Additionally, it is the “ceiling” where you may feel happier, or not, based on your income and financial stress. Income above that, again, according to research, doesn’t impact your happiness level.
Guess how much these researchers make on average? You guessed it, $70,000-$80,000 a year.
https://www.financialsamurai.com/2010/09/20/the-magical-income-number-level-for-maximum-happiness/
Having lived and grown up in a high cost city (Los Angeles) then moving to a low cost mid-western city, these numbers definitely look legit to me. My parents made right around 100k when I was growing up around 10 years ago. Obviously they didn’t give me their tax return but it’s not terribly hard to figure it out. I would have called us middle class, but it felt like lower middle class because of some of their choices. They owned a home, but the neighborhood is not great, and the house is small. They drove newer cars, but not brand new most of the time. They paid for private school because the school near our home was unsafe. It also lost its accreditation 3 years after I graduated. Compared to the people in the private school I went to, we were poor. Compared to the people in my neighborhood we were upper middle class. Had they lived where I lived now, they could have owned a nice home in a nice neighborhood and pocketed the private school costs because the schools are great. Until you’ve actually lived in one of these cities, it’s difficult to comprehend the difference in cost of living.
We’re right smack in the middle of middle class. We are somewhat frugal and Portland is not that expensive compare to CA so we are comfortable. :)
Yeah, I would say 500k income is rich.
Ahh… I always wondered if Portland is somewhere similar to Salt Lake. Seems like I was right.
What a lot of naysayers don’t realize is how much income taxes are paid at higher levels. They are talking out of their ass if they think $200,000 is rich, simply b/c they have no idea.
In NYC, I would say $500,000 is “upper middle class”. San Francisco… perhaps the same although your dollar goes 20-30% farther for property.
In my area, making 100k a year would put you pretty far ahead of the rest of the people in town, so I’d say that would be considered rich. You’d be able to live very comfortably, and probably purchase a house outright (even after retirement account maxing) in 3-5 years, depending on other goals and lifestyle. There’s not really much of a chance of me justifying my own income here, because I dont make anywhere near 100k!
I see your point, as being rich is relative. If everybody made $500,000, you wouldn’t feel rich at all!
The bubble of NoCal really skews your perspective on these things.
Your categories build in substantial lifestyle inflation that makes it look like people earning huge sums of money are just “middle class”.
This is just not true – a family making wise choices with a $100K income can be “rich” while a family making poor choices, such as a $1.1M mortgage, with a $500K income can be “poor”.
Are you not justifying your income here? Every single level I stick to my savings rate guide (20-35%).
You aren’t understanding taxation if you think a $1.1 million mortgage is a lot for someone making $500,000+. They have an effective tax rate of 35%, and $1.1 is the max mortgage indebtedness for interest tax write-off.
An increase in income does not require a corresponding increase in expenses in order to maintain a healthy and happy lifestyle.
It still costs roughly the same (have to factor in natural inflation of course) to keep your family fed, clothed, and sheltered.
Cool, so you recommend saving more than 35% right? And you are speaking from experience on your income and are saving more than 35%?
Replying to FS:
I had to crunch the numbers…I actually came up with a savings rate of somewhere around 35% of my take home pay, depending on the month. I should point out that until my wife quit to stay at home with our newborn baby, we were saving 100% of her take home income.
Above the line…I contribute up to the maximum match from my employer in a 401(k).
What I’m really getting at, I think, is that the key to being “rich” is being frugal. It’s not what you earn, it’s what you spend.
I complete agree with you Macro. I believe that no one, regardless of your income level, ever feels that they’ve crossed the “rich” threshold, as most of these comments prove. It’s easy to look at your financial situation and feel that you’re just barely scraping by on $200,000, but if you look at your expenses, how much did you inflate your lifestyle by when you starting earning more??
I absolute agree.
Blogs and financial advice always say you need to budget? I personally have never understood this. I spend what I need to spend and save the rest, thus budgeting is not necessary.
I really think I could earn 100% more and my spending would increase only marginally – 10% max would be my guess. Maybe I’m Warren Buffett!
How much do you make now? I highly doubt if your income goes up 200%, your spending only goes up 10%.
Your tax bill will be huge, and only when you get to live off capital income, then will your tax bill go down.
Travis, unless you make $200,000, $350,000, $500,000, you and David probably have no idea.
The problem with generalities is it fits some anonymous group like the rich/wealthy. I think annual earnings of nillion dollars is definitely rich, however it is what you have left that may make you rich. The million dollar earner may spend it all on frivolous things like cars, jewelry, dinners out etc and have nothing left. He may be rich, but a fool! I think we should be encouraged to save and invest. It would certainly help the economy.
I live in Vancouver (Canada), and it’s the second most expensive city in the entire world when looked at income vs. living costs (housing prices, transit and transportation prices, etc). I’d say I’d feel “well off” but not rich if I made over $200,000 (or $250,000 with two people). If I made $100,000, and the boy made $100,000, and we somehow made an extra $50,000, I’m sure we’d be able to afford a decent house and reliable cars, but with a family, kids, education, transportation and housing costs in Vancouver, we wouldn’t be THAT well off.
The higher you go, the less you will feel you’re getting return because of taxes. It will literally make you sick to your stomach, and I know the Canadian tax system is quite high at 40%!
This is America – thus 1% of the country is rich, 1 % is poor and 98% is middle class. That is what I think from watching the news and reading and listening about politics.
To me PERSONALLY, I so no value in determining what income level is rich. For example if, $500,000 is rich then what is $498, 886?
$498,886 is considered upper middle class. Only $500,000+ is considered rich.
Thanks – now I know that I’m not rich! :) Maybe next year!
well i’d shoot to stay at $498,886 unless you can make up the difference of the potential increased tax amount.
My wife and I live in Oklahoma and gross about $140k per year. We are able to save and invest a ton, live in a nice house (2200 square feet), drive good cars etc with this income level. I wouldn’t call us rich, per se, however I feel that with this income level and about 10 years, we can become rich (I’m only 27 now). To feel rich here where we live, I’d say the number would be $200k to $250k in household income, however, once we get there (hopefully), I’m sure I’ll want to raise that number.
The curveball is that the wife wants to quit work in about 2 years when we start a family, so the onus will be on me to find a way to replace her income over the next 2-3 years so that we can continue on the same path toward our goals.
Thanks for your example highlighting your spouse’s desire to quit and be a SAHM. When you get to $250,000 or more, you will acutely feel the government breathing down your neck to take your money. You will see a much higher percentage of your income go to taxes, and you will not feel rich.
Just my opinion. Let me know when you get there!
Coming from suburbs of Atlanta, I think I’d take a sizable discount to the above numbers. Considering you can buy a 3,000+ square foot house on at least an acre in an upscale neighborhood for around $165-195,000… in Georgia, I’d say upper middle class is around $100K and rich is anything north of $250K.
(But please don’t tell the Democrats)
You certainly can’t purchase that sort of house for that sort of money in any suburb north of Atlanta that is within 30 – 40 miles. Maybe you can find those sorts of houses at those prices out by the airport or south of the city. We live in East Cobb and every knew housing development around here starts at between $600k and $1MM.
Sometimes I think that “rich” is anyone who doesn’t support Obama’s divisive politicking (as opposed to the other party’s divisive policking). :-(
I’ve always thought of “rich” as being a statement of wealth – not income. Even then, cost of living, age, number of dependants etc can render one person with $X rich while another person with more than $X is not rich.
As far as getting there is concerned (wherever “there” is), the best method for most people is to focus on generating employment derived income, live well below your means, invest prudently and don’t get divorced etc. Other options based on business start ups etc are IMHO wonderful when they happen but long shots for most people.
A further thought: you can get relatively rich by earning a high income in a high cost location like NY and then retiring to a low cost location (obviously this will impact social life etc, but it works financially).
I agree with you. I think your advice is insurance for those who want to succeed and get ‘there.’ ‘There’ can mean different things to different people. I know plenty of millionaires who did not make those incomes. Ever. Yet, they made it ‘there.’ Their examples lead me to think differently about how to do things for myself and my family.
I like the guidelines you’ve come up with, as far as evaluating income levels. Living in the thriving metropolis of Buffalo, NY, I can safely take a healthy discount off those numbers though. However, you run the numbers, $200K isn’t rich in most cities. People who think that, well, live in Buffalo!! I’ve visited enough larger cities to know the “rich” bar is much higher than $200K.
My favorite definition of true wealth, though, still comes from Rich Dad, Poor Dad. Wealth is how long you can live at your desired standard of living if you stopped working today.
Joe, Rob has a good definition of wealth. Can’t argue with that.
May I ask, out of all the places in the world, why Buffalo?
Well, I was born here. I’ve been one of the fortunate ones to latch on to a successful company. And, of course, there’s family. The biggest reason we’re still here!!
Trust me, my wife and I fantasize almost daily about jetting out of here. At least we have good football. Oh, wait, never mind.
I think “rich” is incredibly subjective. I’ve lived in cities where the median home price was 2 times my annual salary; I now live in a city where it’s NINE times my salary. If you look at the highest cost of living cities in the world, NYC is actually the only U.S. city on the list:
That said, I now earn nearly US$90,000 a year. I’m not rich yet, but I am definitely upper middle class, even here in Australia where we have a high cost of living. I fully expect my income to rise over my career. And I also think that I should pay more taxes when that happens.
I agree with you that we should all seek to maximize our income. But I also know that a person’s socioeconomic status is determined by multiple factors. I would love to see my income taxed more in order to support high quality schools in poor neighborhoods and healthcare for all, for instance.
“Rich” is subjective indeed. When you reach the $200,000 level where I start considering individuals to be upper middle class, let me know if you still feel the same with a $70,000+ Aussir tax bill!
You know what? I am fully ok with that tax bill. :)
If you want to pay more taxes, write a check! Just leave me out of your altruistic view of things. The government only deserves dollars used to provide necessities like roads, defense, and general infrastructure. Our efforts to educate our children, provide assistance to the under-privileged and retirement planning should be left to the individual. Governments suck at those things from an efficiency standpoint and treat tax dollars as “their” dollars as opposed to our hard-earned dollars……
Socio-economic status has more to do with lifestyle than sums of money.
Anyone who needs to work for a living is working class. Regardless of whether they have a corporate job or do a trade. The great majority of us are working class because that is how a society functions. If you have worked all your life and still can’t sustain your lifestyle from your capital, then I am sorry to say you have not moved out of the working class.
Middle-class are those families who don’t neccessarily need to work to put food on the table and afford housing. They may earn a passive income, own property, etc. How extravagant the lifestyle determines whether they are lower, middle or higher middle-class. You would need to have enough capital to live off, I would say $500,000 in assets/savings as a minimum to get yourself into lower middle-class.
A rich person is anyone who can not only support an extravagant lifestyle for themselves, but also the wages of their servants. If you have or could have people working for you full-time for purely domestic purposes then you are rich.
These guidelines apply over many places and time because they are at the heart of heirarchal societies.
I’m impressed you think middle class families “don’t necessarily need to work to put food on the table and afford housing.”
Many would say that is the definition of the wealthy. And if that truly is the definition of middle class, then I’m so bullish on our future!
Are you insane? So a amazon ceo is working class? You sir, are insane.
You make a really good point about what is rich. Hitting $200,000 per year is not rich, and shouldn’t be taxed as such. I’m close to that this year, and like you said, I’m just starting out. However, I think you’re right – about $500,000 per year is. Maybe they add another tax bracket (don’t change the existing), at that level.
Also, you have to remember that the “rich” usually earn their money through savings and investments, and not wages, so are taxed substantially different as well (paying capital gains rates and such). This needs to be addressed as well.
Well done Rob for almost getting to the big 200 level! Hope you surpass that this year and don’t get to upset at the tax bill when you do!
I have to say that there needs to be a NYC guide too. 500K in NYC isn’t rich. It’s upper middle class. Now that I say that I might be part of the poor class being in NYC. Actually the upper poor class.
Anyway I love the fact that you said fuck it and started a website. I always say one needs to take on the fuck it philosophy. You strengthen my point.
Upper poor class sounds pretty good too! I feel for Manhattan residents with the extra 2-3% cIty tax! Great city though.
Wow really? 500 thousand upper middle class, there are sections of Oregon where homes start at 500 thousand, and have been labeled ghetto, lousy construction, rush jobs cheap fences, no yards, reach out the window touch your neighbors house, they guessed that in less than five years the owners will be doing major renovations if not better off living in a card board box under a bridge.
Martin, I live in Portland. Where are you talking about? Lake Oswego, West Linn, Sherwood, Bend? 500k in Portland, the most expensive city in the state, does not equate to ghetto I would assume the same for the rest of the state as well.
New York is a far cry from everyday America. In the Lehigh Valley, in Pa. if you make 100,000 dollars a year, you are well off. This guy who wrote this article forgets that federal taxes are not the only thing. In the Lehigh Valley, the average school tax is $7,000.00. Car payments $3,000 a year. Mortgages and rents $800.00 a month, for a total of $9600 dollars a year. even if you do not get a new car, it is still damn close to 20 thousand dollars a year in expenses, before you even consider insurance for car, home, electric, gasoline and heating expenses.